• Adults Only Website 18+

    If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.

    We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.

    We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.

    Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.

    We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.

    By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.

Unbelievable

A federal judge dismissed charges Tuesday against two doctors and six others involved in the genital mutilation of nine girls at a Detroit clinic, and also declared a US law banning the practice unconstitutional.
US District Judge Bernard Friedman dismissed mutilation and conspiracy charges against Dr. Jumana Nagarwala, who performed the surgery, and Dr. Fakhruddin Attar, who allowed his clinic in Livonia, Michigan, to be used for the procedure.

The same charges were dismissed against Attar's wife, Farida, and Tahera Shafiq, who assisted in the procedure, as well as four women who tricked their daughters into going to the suburban clinic to undergo the practice for religious purposes.

Four of the nine girls are from Michigan; the others are residents of Illinois and Minnesota.

Nagarwala also admitted she performed a religious custom on girls from her Muslim sect, the India-based Dawoodi Bohra. The remaining defendants are also apart of the sect.
Nagarwala pleaded not guilty last month to the two remaining charges she now faces.

She still faces conspiracy to travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct and obstruction charges. Others in the case face obstruction charges.

Friedman argued in his 28-page opinion that Congress 'overstepped its bounds by legislating to prohibit female genital mutilation.'

He wrote: 'FGM is a "local criminal activity" which, in keeping with long-standing tradition and our federal system of government, is for the states to regulate, not Congress.

Michigan was the 26th US state to officially ban the practice, also known as female circumcision or cutting.

The state law was passed a few months after Nagarwala's April 2017 arrest.
Female genital mutilation has been condemned by the United Nations but is common for girls in some parts of Asia, Africa and the Middle East.

'As despicable as this practice may be, it is essentially a criminal assault. FGM is not part of a larger market and it has no demonstrated effect on interstate commerce.

'The Commerce Clause does not permit Congress to regulate a crime of this nature,' Friedman said.

A spokeswoman said Tuesday that the US attorney's office is currently reviewing Friedman's opinion.

Molly Blythe, a lawyer for Nagarwala, said in an email her team was thrilled about the ruling.
We are very excited about today's ruling, although the victory is bittersweet given we fully anticipated our client to be vindicated at trial on those charges,' Blythe said.
Defense attorney Shannon Smith also said she didn't think Friedman 'would rule in our favor.'

Smith filed a motion on behalf of Nagarwala to have the charges dismissed.

'When I first started researching, I was not sure how strong the motion would be, but I became more confident this would be the right result,' she said.

Smith said that if the ruling is appealed that 'we're hoping the Court of Appeals and Supreme Court agree that the 1996 law was unconstitutional.'

The World Health Organization estimates that more than 200 million girls and women alive today have undergone FGM.
Genital mutilation charges dismissed in Detroit-area case | Daily Mail Online
 
I don't get it what's the purpose of this FGM? I didn't realize you could circumcise a girl??




Female Genital Mutilation occurs in non-Muslim societies in Africa and is practiced by Christians, Muslims and Animists alike. In Egypt, where perhaps 97 percent of girls suffer genital mutilation, both Christian Copts and Muslims are complicit. Thus, it has long been concluded to be a cultural practice, not connected to religion.

However, on the village level, those who commit the practice offer a mix of cultural and religious reasons for the practice. Christians and Muslims alike believe that circumcision of girls prevents them from vice and makes them more attractive for future husbands; mothers fear that their daughters can’t get married if they have not been cut.

Sometimes myths have formed to justify FGM. Hanny Lightfoot-Klein, an expert on FGM who spent years in Kenya, Egypt, and Sudan, explains that “it is believed in the Sudan that the clitoris will grow to the length of a goose’s neck until it dangles between the legs, in rivalry with the male’s penis, if it is not cut.”[1]

However, Muslim proponents of FGM also stress the religious necessity. Midwifes and mothers insist that it is “sunnah” – an opinion shared by most Islamic clerics. Yet, sunnah can either mean that a practice is religiously recommended or simply that it was done that way in the times of the prophet Mohammed.

While there is no mention of FGM in the Quran, a Hadith (saying about the life of the prophet) recounts a debate between Muhammed and Um Habibah (or Um ‘Atiyyah). This woman, known as an exciser of female slaves, was one of a group of women who had immigrated with Muhammed. Having seen her, Muhammad asked her if she kept practicing her profession. She answered affirmatively, adding: “unless it is forbidden, and you order me to stop doing it.” Muhammed replied: “Yes, it is allowed. Come closer so I can teach you: if you cut, do not overdo it, because it brings more radiance to the face, and it is more pleasant for the husband.”
 
Female Genital Mutilation occurs in non-Muslim societies in Africa and is practiced by Christians, Muslims and Animists alike. In Egypt, where perhaps 97 percent of girls suffer genital mutilation, both Christian Copts and Muslims are complicit. Thus, it has long been concluded to be a cultural practice, not connected to religion.

However, on the village level, those who commit the practice offer a mix of cultural and religious reasons for the practice. Christians and Muslims alike believe that circumcision of girls prevents them from vice and makes them more attractive for future husbands; mothers fear that their daughters can’t get married if they have not been cut.

Sometimes myths have formed to justify FGM. Hanny Lightfoot-Klein, an expert on FGM who spent years in Kenya, Egypt, and Sudan, explains that “it is believed in the Sudan that the clitoris will grow to the length of a goose’s neck until it dangles between the legs, in rivalry with the male’s penis, if it is not cut.”[1]

However, Muslim proponents of FGM also stress the religious necessity. Midwifes and mothers insist that it is “sunnah” – an opinion shared by most Islamic clerics. Yet, sunnah can either mean that a practice is religiously recommended or simply that it was done that way in the times of the prophet Mohammed.

While there is no mention of FGM in the Quran, a Hadith (saying about the life of the prophet) recounts a debate between Muhammed and Um Habibah (or Um ‘Atiyyah). This woman, known as an exciser of female slaves, was one of a group of women who had immigrated with Muhammed. Having seen her, Muhammad asked her if she kept practicing her profession. She answered affirmatively, adding: “unless it is forbidden, and you order me to stop doing it.” Muhammed replied: “Yes, it is allowed. Come closer so I can teach you: if you cut, do not overdo it, because it brings more radiance to the face, and it is more pleasant for the husband.”
Wow thanks for explaining all that! Some crazy stuff. I guess the woman can't have an orgasm without the clitoris.
 
Really? Your argument is specious at best. The female can still climax without a clitoris, as can the male without a foreskin. Pregnancy is equally uninterrupted. just some sicko judgment call to make other forms of climax more difficult because of a fucking belief in an invisible man
 
Really? Your argument is specious at best. The female can still climax without a clitoris, as can the male without a foreskin. Pregnancy is equally uninterrupted. just some sicko judgment call to make other forms of climax more difficult because of a fucking belief in an invisible man
No foreSKIN does it hurt when you piss? No. It does when some Islamic shitheel cuts chunks of MEAT from a vagina. That shit does some serious damage. Your religious argument is apples and oranges.
 
I'm against all involuntary genital mutilation male and female. i'm also against all forms of religion. i think ALL religious people should be put to death yesterday.
Atheists eat babies tho.
20181119_050936.webp
 
I am fully aware that the horror that is female genital mutilation is way worse than circumcision. The point was about adults cutting off pieces of our genitals for religion is unforgivable. My mom's a Christian and she had me cut, the bitch. I've told her that to her face, ftr. If I'd had boys, they'd be fully hooded.
 
Back
Top