War US-Israeli Attack On Iran | Israeli War w/Lebanon: Frequent News Updates & Footage Vids

[DeathHand]

Vid: Airstrikes in northern Tehran, 2 vids merged,, Iran, Mar 27 2026.

Vid: Low-level interception over Tel Aviv, Ramat Gan, the first attempt failed to make contact, second succeeded at last minute, Mar 18 2026.

Vid: Low-level interception over Tel Aviv, Ramat Gan, the first attempt failed to make contact, second succeeded at last minute, Mar 18 2026.

 

[DeathHand]

Vid: Bunker busting bombs strike probable IRGC targets, Tehran, Iran, Mar 27 2026. Bunker busters in a city?

Vid: Iranian strike on Bahrain, Mar 27 2026.

Vid: IRGC drone strike against Erbil, Kurdistan, Iraq, Mar 29 2026.

Vid: Sitz & Giggles.

 

[DeathHand]

Vid: Trump, its a military (combat) operation in Iran, because he doesn't need Congress approval for that, like he would if was called a war, Mar 28 2026. Same thing that Pootin did with Ukraine and as the US did with both Vietnam and Afghanistan. Not only is congree permission needed but also no need to declare war (which would have have to go before Congress and the public).

 

[DeathHand]

Trump’s conflicting messages sow confusion over the Iran war​

Mar 28 2026

"President Donald Trump says the United States is winning the war with Iran even as thousands of additional American troops deploy to the Middle East.

He has pilloried other countries for not helping the U.S., only to say later he does not need their assistance. He has twice delayed deadlines for Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. He has both threatened to “obliterate” Iran’s energy plants if the vital waterway remains largely shuttered and said the U.S. was “not affected” by the closure.

At one point this month, Trump said one of his predecessors — who, he strongly suggested, was a Democrat — privately told him he wished he had taken similar action against Iran. Representatives for every living former president quickly denied that such a conversation happened.

As the war entered its second month on Saturday, Trump’s penchant for embellishments, exaggerations and falsehoods is being tested in an environment where the stakes are much higher than an isolated political fight.

A president who has long embraced bluster and salesmanship to shape narratives and focus attention is confronting the unpredictability of war.

Leon Panetta, who served Democratic presidents as defense secretary, CIA director and White House chief of staff, said he has “seen enough wars where truth becomes the first casualty.”

“It’s not the first administration that has not told the truth about war,” he said. “But the president has made it kind of a very standard approach to almost any question to in one way or another kind of lie about what’s really happening and basically describe everything as fine and that we’re winning the war.”

Michael Rubin, a historian at the American Enterprise Institute who worked as a staff adviser on Iran and Iraq at the Pentagon from 2002 to 2004, said Trump is “the first president of any party in recent history that hasn’t self-constrained to live within rhetorical boundaries.”

“So of course it creates a great deal of confusion,” he said.

The zigs and zags are the point

To his critics, Trump’s style is a sign that doesn’t have a coherent long-term strategy. But for Trump, the zigs and zags seem like the point, a method that keeps his opponents — and pretty much everyone else — always on their heels.

The approach was clear this week in the hours before he announced the second delay of the deadline for Iran to reopen the strait. Asked what he would do about the deadline, Trump said he did not know and that he had a day before he had to decide.

“In Trump time, a day, you know what it is, that’s an eternity,” the Republican president said to laughter from members of his Cabinet.

But investors are unimpressed, with U.S. stocks closing out their worst week since the war began. To some on Capitol Hill, the freewheeling is more frustrating than amusing.

Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, lamented that Trump is “going back and forth and constantly contradicting himself.”

“The administration is winging it,” he said. “So how can you trust what the president says?”

Republicans were not willing to go that far, but their concern was apparent heading into a two-week break from Washington. Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana said his constituents “support what the president has done.”

“But most of my people are also equally or even more so concerned about cost of living,” he said.

Republican Rep. Chip Roy of Texas, who sits on the House Budget Committee and is a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, said his constituents were on board with “blowing some crap up.” Nonetheless, he expressed reservations about the prospect of ground troops and said the administration has not provided enough details in briefings for lawmakers. Such sessions, he said, only reveal information you “read in the papers.”

“Taking out bad guys, taking out conventional (weapons), taking out or at least working to take out nuclear capability, pressing to keep the straits open, all those are good things and I’ve been supportive and will continue to be supportive,” Roy said. “But we’ve got to have a serious conversation about how long this is going to go, boots on the ground, all those things, press for further briefings and understanding of where it’s all headed.”

Republicans back Trump but there are risks

While Trump has maintained deep support among Republicans, a poll this week from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research indicates that the president risks frustrating his voters if the U.S. gets involved in the kind of prolonged war in the Middle East that he promised to avoid.

Although 63% of Republicans back airstrikes against Iranian military targets, the survey found, only 20% back deploying American ground troops.

That reflects the political challenges ahead for Trump, who did not prepare the country for such an extensive overseas conflict. If the war drags on or escalates, pressure on Republicans could build before the November elections, when their majorities in Congress are at risk. Some in the party have said sending in ground troops would be a red line that Trump should not cross.

The administration also will likely need congressional support for an additional $200 billion to support the war. That amount of money, which Trump has said would be “nice to have,” even as he said the war was “winding down,” would be a tough vote at any time. But it poses particular risks for budget-conscious Republicans in an election year.

White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in a statement that Trump is “right to highlight the vast success of Operation Epic Fury.”

“Iran desperately wants to make a deal because of how badly they are being decimated, but the President reserves all options, military or not, at all times,” she said.

There could be some ‘logic’ to Trump’s approach

Rubin, the former Iran and Iraq adviser at the Pentagon, said there could be some “logic” to the president’s ever-evolving rhetorical approach to the war. He said Trump’s initial comments about ongoing negotiations, which Iran denied, could “spread suspicion and fear within the regime circles.”

“Perhaps Donald Trump or those advising him simply want the Iranians to grow so paranoid they refuse to cooperate with each other or perhaps they even turn on each other,” he said. “But then again, there’s always a danger with Donald Trump of assuming that his rhetoric is anything more than shooting from the hip.”

Rep. Adam Smith of Washington state, the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, said Trump is not going to be able to fully achieve his objectives, including the complete elimination of Iran’s nuclear program, “in the current trajectory.”

And if that is the case, Smith said, the president has the option to rely on his rhetorical skills to simply say the U.S. won — and end the war.

“As I’ve jokingly said, nobody I have ever met or heard of in human history is better at exaggerating his own accomplishments than Donald Trump,” Smith said. “So go knock yourself out and claim this was some great success.” The Associated Press

 

[DeathHand]

1. He seems to be making this out to be due to his influence, a present from the Iranians to him.

Vid: Special Military Operation, not a War, need congressional approval for a war...Pootin did this too.

 

[Tuomas Woorhees]

No updates?

 

[DeathHand]

No updates?

Yup, was out of town. Nothing major...

Vid: Israeli strike in the Dahiya district destroys a building with civilians nearby, Beirut, Lebanon, late Mar 2026. Israel wants this plays deeemolished.

Vid: Iranian backed militia drone strike at a target in Erbil, Kurdistan, Iraq, Mar 29 2026. Gotta love the extra narratives in some of these vids...

 

[DeathHand]

Looks like it pass the buck time. No consult NATO-member countries before attack, go and attack while insulting NATO, refuse an off from France that was going to send some ships, war was already won, Iranians fuck up the Straight of Hormuz because of the attack (it was open before it) by the US and Israel, then needs hellp, then doesn't need help, now it's not Trump's problem.

Dude, the thing closed because you and your military attacked...not because NATO attacked. And why just NATO and China? What about Saudia Arabia, Kuwait, etc. that do their shipping through the Gult and the Straight. Why not calling on them to attack? They have shitloads of shit to do that with, but no, they don't want to get involved.

Just Trump's retarded exit strategy: blame it on someone else to solve and then leave. For fuck sakes, atleast finish what you started. Oh right, you can't. Even your warships won't enter the straight...

1.

2. Vid: Traffic monitor for the Straight of Hormuz...,more ships are being allowed through. Probably those who paid the toll. No Trump presents. Well, probably Pakistani ships, which are now friendly with Iran, Chinese ships, and who has the money are getting through. There;s's still a ton stuck in the gulf that are not moving.

1. Legend for type of ship on vid above. Not that anyone can really tell...even after I slowed the thing down by 70%.

 

[hedgerow]

Looks like it pass the buck time. No consult NATO-member countries before attack, go and attack while insulting NATO, refuse an off from France that was going to send some ships, war was already won, Iranians fuck up the Straight of Hormuz because of the attack (it was open before it) by the US and Israel, then needs hellp, then doesn't need help, now it's not Trump's problem.

Dude, the thing closed because you and your military attacked...not because NATO attacked. And why just NATO and China? What about Saudia Arabia, Kuwait, etc. that do their shipping through the Gult and the Straight. Why not calling on them to attack? They have shitloads of shit to do that with, but no, they don't want to get involved.

Just Trump's retarded exit strategy: blame it on someone else to solve and then leave. For fuck sakes, atleast finish what you started. Oh right, you can't. Even your warships won't enter the straight...

1.
View attachment 974020

2. Vid: Traffic monitor for the Straight of Hormuz...,more ships are being allowed through. Probably those who paid the toll. No Trump presents. Well, probably Pakistani ships, which are now friendly with Iran, Chinese ships, and who has the money are getting through. There;s's still a ton stuck in the gulf that are not moving.
View attachment 974026

1. Legend for type of ship on vid above. Not that anyone can really tell...even after I slowed the thing down by 70%.
View attachment 974027

it looks like they're making Larak their tool booth.

 

[DeathHand]

Continuation of the above as the States turn tail and shows it's true ability to know when they've fucked up. Pass the buck to NATO. Not the US's problem - like who believes that shit? Oh right, Trump, Sir Hegseth (the alcohollic who is now not apparently touching a drop anymore) and Leavitt, the one every guy wants to anally bang, including Trump and Vance.

Vid:

Vid: This, coming from a former FOX news anchor and alky...now turned G.I. Pete (he's actualy a Knight with the Crusaders, so, Sir Pete) of Washalot). What bullshit is being allowed to continue to go in that Golden Cupid White House? Incompetence, stupidity, recklessness, arrogance, retardedness, rinse repeat because Cuba is next. Trump is bored of Iran.

Vid: In the olden days, very olden days, probably before old was old, way way back when Pete's not ancestors ruled part of the world, there was only one way across...just say "blue." Might work....

3. So the US can't pass that haggard old witch of a prune? They just seek the Holy Oil...

5. Well, Iran is not sitting back on it's laurels. It struck the building for Amazon today (no vid yet).

 

[DeathHand]

Various vids of various strikes.

Vid: US-Israeli airstrike reportedly on an IRGC storage site, allegedly for Khordad 15 SAMs, Baharestan, Isfahan province, Iran, abt Mar 31 2026.

Vid: British oil company Castrol struck by Iranian missiles, Iraq, Mar 31-Apr 1 2026.

Vid: Interceptions in Northern occupied Palestine, Apr 1 2026.

Vid: Iranian cluster munition hit residential area (3 vids merged) Ramat Gat, Israel, Apr 1 2026.

 

[DeathHand]

Vid: Moment an Iranian missile struck a U.S. base in the Middle East with US troops in an above ground shelter, Mar 31 2026.

Vid: US F-15 tries and fails to shoot down Iranian Shahed drone over Iraq, Mar 31 2026. Ya, a jet is kinda too fast for this. Although the Ukrainians manage...

Vid: Iranian missile strike Bahrain, Mar 27 2026.

 

[DeathHand]

Vido: Elf Rubio compares Iran to WW2's Nazis taking out shipping ships. Hmm, the US did it too. Alot. But hey, they don't need the Straight.

Vid: Trump, escalates, but now wants pull US forces out Iran and leave NATO to deal with it, Mar 31 2026. Well, the Titanic just hit an iceberg...the US takes all the life boats and the European countries need to deal with the sinking ship. Trying to exit while trying to claim victory: fucking to keep your virginity.

 

[DeathHand]

As Iran tightens pressure on the Strait of Hormuz, Ukraine is building unexpected alliances and exporting the drone expertise that humbled Russia’s navy. Late Mar 2026.

Vid: 16:30 mins.

 

[DeathHand]

Iran, abt Apr 2 2026

US airstrike destroys bridge connecting Karj-Teheran. More to follow. Bridges, that is.

Vid: Two vids merged.

Vid: Jon Stewart: Shitz & Giggles With the Trumps. It 's actually kinda close to what is going on in that wet noodle.

Vid: Trump...now not thinking about pulling out...gonna hit 'em hard...harder than hard. Apr 1 2026.

Vid: Footage shows part of the reported strikes on the Iranian city of Abadan, near the Iraqi border with Basra, Apr 2 2026.

 

[mrln]

yea trump said this would take four weeks and not longer than that. now talking another 3 wks (might as well call it another month). so far no boots on the ground.

 

[DeathHand]

An Iranian drone struck a U.S. Boeing CH-47 Chinook in Kuwait, Apr 2 2026.

1.

2.

3.

4.

 

[DeathHand]

Vid: Iranian border post opposite Al-Faw, Iraq, getting hit, Apr 2 2026.

Vid: Aftermath of impact of Iranian missile in Ramat Gan, Israel, Apr 2 2026.

Vid: U.S-Israeli double-tap strike, B1 bridge, Iran, Mar 31 2026. Thirteen people (rescuers who arrived but then got the double tap) were killed.

Vid: George Carlin talks on Bush's Gulf War.

Vid: US Reaper drone shot down over Iran, 16 shot down to date, Apr 2 2026.

1.

Vid: US losses several aircraft - an F-15E, an F-16, an -10 Warthog and two rescue Hawks damaged. Main thread on this here.

 

[DeathHand]

Trump Proposes 'Historic' $1.5trn Defense Budget

The $500bn defense budget boost is in addition to the $200bn already requested by
The Pentagon in extra funding to pay for the Iran War, a request the White House hasn't officially made to Congress.​

Late Mar 2026

"US President Donald Trump has proposed a huge increase in defense spending, alongside a 10% cut in non-defense spending, for the 2027 fiscal year.

The plans, which require congressional approval, would see the defense budget rise by $500bn, reaching around $1.5trn.

The White House likened the requested funding boost, which will include a 5-7% pay raise for military personnel, to the "historic increases just prior to World War II".

Mr. Trump's spending proposals come as the US war against Iran, which has caused soaring gas prices, enters its sixth week.

The Pentagon had already requested $200bn (£151.49 bn) in extra funding to pay for the Iran conflict, but the White House has not officially made that request to Congress.

The request includes funding for the Golden Dome missile defense shield, and 34 new combat and support ships.

Initial funding for the US president's 'Trump class' battleships would also be included in the defense hike." Source

 

[Yuhongye]

Man, they would get butt fucked into submission.



China would have to go through Japan and Taiwan first. Russia is too distracted with Europe. Iran is filled with junkies and not enough water.



They'd get pecker slapped 🤣

Let’s take a guess: how many aircraft have been shot down in the U.S. as of today? And what happened to the E-3 and F-16E?