• Adults Only Website 18+

    If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.

    We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.

    We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.

    Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.

    We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.

    By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.

Orchestrated Downfall of Europe. Why is this happening?

GenericMale

A most average man, just even average-er.
Why do the European governments insist on committing cultural suicide in the form of allowing millions of illegal immigrants to cross the border and putting them before their own citizens? What is the bigger picture that I'm missing because it makes absolutely ZERO sense to me?
I'd love someone to enlighten me. I wish we could do what USA is doing and have immigration agents kindly kick them the fuck out.
 
Why do the European governments insist on committing cultural suicide in the form of allowing millions of illegal immigrants to cross the border and putting them before their own citizens? What is the bigger picture that I'm missing because it makes absolutely ZERO sense to me?
I'd love someone to enlighten me. I wish we could do what USA is doing and have immigration agents kindly kick them the fuck out.
Interesting question.

I consulted Gemini.

This was my question: "Why do European governments not kick the immigrants out like trump does?"

This was the answer:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually, many European governments are currently moving toward stricter deportation policies similar to the goals of the Trump administration, though they face different legal and practical hurdles.
Here is why it looks different in Europe:

1. Legal and Human Rights Constraints

  • European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR): Unlike the U.S., European countries are bound by the ECHR, which strictly prohibits "refoulement"—sending someone back to a country where they face a real risk of torture or "inhuman or degrading treatment".
  • Individual Assessments: European law generally prohibits "collective expulsions." Every migrant has the right to an individual legal case, which can lead to years of appeals in national and European courts.

2. Lack of Cooperation from Home Countries
  • Travel Documents: Many countries of origin refuse to issue the necessary travel documents for their citizens to be sent back.
  • Political Leverage: European nations often have to negotiate "readmission agreements" with other countries, sometimes offering aid or visa perks in exchange for them taking their citizens back.

3. Economic and Social Trade-offs
  • Labor Needs: Polls show that while many Europeans support stricter borders, they often prioritize economic stability. Reducing migration can lead to critical staff shortages in healthcare and other skilled sectors.
  • Demographics: With aging populations, many EU governments are cautious about mass deportations that could further shrink their workforce.

4. New "Trump-Style" Shifts in 2024–2026
Despite these obstacles, the EU is currently implementing a "crusade" of tougher measures:

  • "Return Hubs": European leaders are proposing the creation of offshore deportation centers in third countries (outside the EU) where migrants would be sent while awaiting removal.
  • The 2024 Migration Pact: New rules entering full force by 2026 allow for fast-tracked removals, expanded detention times (up to 24 months), and increased surveillance to detect irregular stays.
  • Higher Deportation Numbers: In the first nine months of 2024 alone, EU states issued over 327,000 expulsion orders. "
-------------------------------------------------------
 
Why do the European governments insist on committing cultural suicide in the form of allowing millions of illegal immigrants to cross the border and putting them before their own citizens? What is the bigger picture that I'm missing because it makes absolutely ZERO sense to me?
I'd love someone to enlighten me. I wish we could do what USA is doing and have immigration agents kindly kick them the fuck out.

Reparations for their country’s historical mistakes to the deficit of their current population.

I also think the countries who are allowing this to happen have had it so good for so long after the previous wars that they’ve forgotten there are cultures and religions in the world who hate them just for the fact that they are different. Those who invade will not assimilate. Their agenda is to overthrow by marrying your daughters and breeding as many children as they can so they will outnumber the current populations who’ve been there for centuries.

I blame each country for their own ethnic, racial, cultural, and religious apathy. When you stand for nothing, you’ll fall for everything. You deserve everything that’s coming to you.
 
How does it benefit the common good?
There's no common good (people/nation) It's pure capitalism. It only benefits the people with money.
According to these "thinkers", they believe that future generations of these immigrants will fill the gap in terms of birth rates in Western countries. It is a form of counteracting the upcoming economic hegemony of China and India - countries with billions of inhabitants
 
Last edited:
Why do the European governments insist on committing cultural suicide in the form of allowing millions of illegal immigrants to cross the border and putting them before their own citizens? What is the bigger picture that I'm missing because it makes absolutely ZERO sense to me?
I'd love someone to enlighten me. I wish we could do what USA is doing and have immigration agents kindly kick them the fuck out.
Poland still doing alright?
 
This is my theory. The world wars killed a large chunk of the bravest and strongest, the ideologies of these dead men could not be passed on to children who were raised by single mothers or the state in orphanages. As for the men who didn't serve in the war (the physically and mentally disabled, cowards *who were imprisoned as a result but released at war's end, nearly all the women, etc.) any ideology they passed on would have been largely the opposite of that of those that died fighting in battle (the ideology that built the great empires).

The surviving population was skewed massively toward women and weak men, there were still some strong men - but they no longer had the majority control they had for nearly all of time prior. Just as an example, 90% of all Russian men born in 1926 were all dead by 1945. The loss of primary providers led to widespread support of state sponsored social welfare (the NHS for example, was a creation of WWII UK).

If you're wondering why this push toward a liberal social nanny state happened in Europe but not the USA is because despite winning both world wars the USA did not enter either conflict until they were well underway, as a result the USA experienced the least casualty ratios and as a result had more veterans return home alive to raise families properly instead of the disproportional instances of single motherhood, childless widowhood, spinsters, and orphans common in European nations who all needed liberal (in many cases full on Marxist) social welfare - especially in Eastern Europe which was indoctrinated and occupied by the Soviet Union from 1945-1991.
 
There's no common good (people/nation) It's pure capitalism. It only benefits the people with money.
According to these "thinkers", they believe that future generations of these immigrants will fill the gap in terms of birth rates in Western countries. It is a form of counteracting the upcoming economic hegemony of China and India - countries with billions of inhabitants
I agree and would add that there is also an element of elitism at work. Ursula Von der Kunt and friends see the middle class as competitors for the available wealth and therefore wish to reduce them to peasantry. Bringing in hordes of savages will facilitate this process.
 
Interesting question.

I consulted Gemini.

This was my question: "Why do European governments not kick the immigrants out like trump does?"

This was the answer:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually, many European governments are currently moving toward stricter deportation policies similar to the goals of the Trump administration, though they face different legal and practical hurdles.
Here is why it looks different in Europe:

1. Legal and Human Rights Constraints

  • European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR): Unlike the U.S., European countries are bound by the ECHR, which strictly prohibits "refoulement"—sending someone back to a country where they face a real risk of torture or "inhuman or degrading treatment".
  • Individual Assessments: European law generally prohibits "collective expulsions." Every migrant has the right to an individual legal case, which can lead to years of appeals in national and European courts.

2. Lack of Cooperation from Home Countries
  • Travel Documents: Many countries of origin refuse to issue the necessary travel documents for their citizens to be sent back.
  • Political Leverage: European nations often have to negotiate "readmission agreements" with other countries, sometimes offering aid or visa perks in exchange for them taking their citizens back.

3. Economic and Social Trade-offs
  • Labor Needs: Polls show that while many Europeans support stricter borders, they often prioritize economic stability. Reducing migration can lead to critical staff shortages in healthcare and other skilled sectors.
  • Demographics: With aging populations, many EU governments are cautious about mass deportations that could further shrink their workforce.

4. New "Trump-Style" Shifts in 2024–2026
Despite these obstacles, the EU is currently implementing a "crusade" of tougher measures:

  • "Return Hubs": European leaders are proposing the creation of offshore deportation centers in third countries (outside the EU) where migrants would be sent while awaiting removal.
  • The 2024 Migration Pact: New rules entering full force by 2026 allow for fast-tracked removals, expanded detention times (up to 24 months), and increased surveillance to detect irregular stays.
  • Higher Deportation Numbers: In the first nine months of 2024 alone, EU states issued over 327,000 expulsion orders. "
-------------------------------------------------------
Didn't it come out that the deportation centers are just shipping them back between France and UK to make people shut the hell up?
 
A few reasons: the Left gains voters and see the native white population being slowly replaced & mongrelized, the big employers gain some cheap labor and the jews get to rule over all this shitshow & enslave everyone with endless personal & State debt. Considering the fact that the Right is mostly controlled opposition, I believe I can safely say that the europeans are driven to poverty, serfdom & extinction by their own politicians. For further reference, check the EU's policies, the WEF's goals, the Rotherham scandal & the Epstein files.
 
Why do the European governments insist on committing cultural suicide in the form of allowing millions of illegal immigrants to cross the border and putting them before their own citizens? What is the bigger picture that I'm missing because it makes absolutely ZERO sense to me?
I'd love someone to enlighten me. I wish we could do what USA is doing and have immigration agents kindly kick them the fuck out.
Payoffs from allowing this shit, whether the citizens care means nothing. Its 💰 bottom line
 
Back
Top