Ravishing Rick Rude
THE BIG BADDY BOOTY DADDY
Sorry whenever I hear or see the name Kane , I just think of what he'll fire and brimstone his brother The Undertaker put him through , I'm glad there friends now , but in case you needed a refresher
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.
We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.
We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.
Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.
We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.
By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.
Kane is still here, he didn’t ban himself as far as I know. It’s not that we are weak it’s that people are weak. You fascist and trumpers cave to the mob and to bullying just like anybody and this site is seen as a retched hive of trumpists and Nazis. Whats a WAT badge?
Name a leftist, and they are a bully. It's part of their platform these days.Ever since 2016 I have been labeled all types of names. I use logic not feelings. Bullying? Do you mean the type of bullying on a daily basis from sm and msm just because you disagree with the Democratic Party?
Your ilk has already pisst off millions.
What does vomiting have to do with a hive?You fascist and trumpers cave to the mob and to bullying just like anybody and this site is seen as a retched hive of trumpists and Nazis. Whats a WAT badge?
You are a Trumper. I’m just calling you a name, that’s what you are. You support him and I think anyone who doesn’t that after what he tried to do in 2020 at least. That you want a man of such low character and that’s such an obvious fraud. You don’t care about logic. Dont make me laugh. You are riddled with bias and irrationality just like any libtard you can mention. You refuse to look at reality.Ever since 2016 I have been labeled all types of names. I use logic not feelings. Bullying? Do you mean the type of bullying on a daily basis from sm and msm just because you disagree with the Democratic Party?
Your ilk has already pisst off millions.
You are a Trumper. I’m just calling you a name, that’s what you are. You support him and I think anyone who doesn’t that after what he tried to do in 2020 at least. That you want a man of such low character and that’s such an obvious fraud. You don’t care about logic. Dont make me laugh. You are riddled with bias and irrationality just like any libtard you can mention. You refuse to look at reality.
You are just like the liberal and lefties who wrapped their flag around Bill Clinton when he was such an obvious scumbag fraud, compromising their principles for a man whoever the democrats to the right.
You are like those liberals and leftists in the 90s but with Trump now. Shame on you and how dare you considered yourself some kind of patriot.
No not all conservatives at all. I think that about the people who support Trump and are in denial about what he did around the 2020 election. I also think that about the neo-Nazi and klansman types because I don’t like Nazis or nazism because I’m not schizophrenic. You don’t quite fall into these two categories from what I remember, but it’s been a while so I’m not sure.What does vomiting have to do with a hive?
View attachment 825437
^ what eric thinks of us proud deplorables
Yea that’s about what I expected. You can’t handle the voice of reason and logic and so you have to do veiled threats that aren’t even funny to someone who is trying to talk blunt sense to you. You have fallen for a conman who doesn’t care about you.
No not all conservatives at all. I think that about the people who support Trump and are in denial about what he did around the 2020 election. I also think that about the neo-Nazi and klansman types because I don’t like Nazis or nazism because I’m not schizophrenic. You don’t quite fall into these two categories from what I remember, but it’s been a while so I’m not sure.
Yea that’s about what I expected. You can’t handle the voice of reason and logic and so you have to do veiled threats that aren’t even funny to someone who is trying to talk blunt sense to you. You have fallen for a conman who doesn’t care about you.
Maybe it wasn’t now that I look at it again I see what you were saying. It changes nothing of what I said though. I took my meds today, exercised, and enjoying my Saturday. How bout you go get some meds and maybe you’ll see the light.It was not a threat. Take your fucking meds.
No doubt Trump has his liabilities, from my point of view, between him and that non-entity, he's the better choice, especially for the Supreme Court.No not all conservatives at all. I think that about the people who support Trump and are in denial about what he did around the 2020 election. I also think that about the neo-Nazi and klansman types because I don’t like Nazis or nazism because I’m not schizophrenic. You don’t quite fall into these two categories from what I remember, but it’s been a while so I’m not sure.
I’ll answer the last thing first. Nothing has changed, I just get bored of this site and it gets old so I take a break and when I come back it’s not boring.No doubt Trump has his liabilities, from my point of view, between him and that non-entity, he's the better choice, especially for the Supreme Court.
Harris is almost a full-blown (haha) communist in thinking...if she gets in, I hope both houses of Congress are Republican to stymie her agenda.
ps--it has been a while, where'd you disappear off to?
progressive judges legislate from the bench in a dictatorially way, and that's against the intent of the ConstitutionI’ll answer the last thing first. Nothing has changed, I just get bored of this site and it gets old so I take a break and when I come back it’s not boring.
She is not almost a communist that’s insane. She’s not even a socialist.
Let me ask you, you say you know Trump has liabilities. Well tell me what those are then? Also Trump already filled quite a few spots, what was it three or something. What are you afraid the Supreme Court will do?
Also how is Trump going to be better in domestic and foreign policy and implementing it successfully?
Take another nice long break. Perhaps, turn in some resumes bitch boy.I’ll answer the last thing first. Nothing has changed, I just get bored of this site and it gets old so I take a break and when I come back it’s not boring.
She is not almost a communist that’s insane. She’s not even a socialist.
Let me ask you, you say you know Trump has liabilities. Well tell me what those are then? Also Trump already filled quite a few spots, what was it three or something. What are you afraid the Supreme Court will do?
Also how is Trump going to be better in domestic and foreign policy and implementing it successfully?
give me an example of one of the Supreme Court justice doing that, or do you have a lower court in mind. You might have a point there but isn’t the president, aka Trump, being criminally immune from actions around the 2020 election and that precedent?progressive judges legislate from the bench in a dictatorially way, and that's against the intent of the Constitution
From my limited knowledge the Roe vs Wade ruling was on shaky legal ground. Arguing for legal abortion through privacy clauses in the constitution. But why aren’t you concerned with state power. The states that don’t allow any abortion whatsoever and other things. As far as speed limits idk what you mean as I haven’t heard anything about that.it's the job of courts to interpret law, not to legislate law...the SC is finally reining in federal power a bit, whether it's abortion or speed limits
read the tenth amendment, and tell me how it's not blatantly clear those are issues for the individual States to decide
I’ve never heard anybody say that about the constitution except Marxist-Leninist left types who never believed in the constitution or liberal democracy in the first place or by right wing Nazis who also don’t believe in it. I certainly don’t belive that. Trump tried to override the constitution because he lost an election and he is a psycho who couldn’t admit he lost and tried to get the Vice President and State officials to go along with his scheme so if you care about the Constitution why the fuck are you voting for Trumpmany people say the Constitution is a dead letter, but it's still the law of the land...either dump it or enforce it
What many ways?i'm not into the intricate details of political debates...i'll just say trump will make a better president, imho, in so many ways
i don't knowgive me an example of one of the Supreme Court justice doing that, or do you have a lower court in mind. You might have a point there but isn’t the president, aka Trump, being criminally immune from actions around the 2020 election and that precedent?
From my limited knowledge the Roe vs Wade ruling was on shaky legal ground. Arguing for legal abortion through privacy clauses in the constitution. But why aren’t you concerned with state power. The states that don’t allow any abortion whatsoever and other things. As far as speed limits idk what you mean as I haven’t heard anything about that.
What issues?
I’ve never heard anybody say that about the constitution except Marxist-Leninist left types who never believed in the constitution or liberal democracy in the first place or by right wing Nazis who also don’t believe in it. I certainly don’t belive that. Trump tried to override the constitution because he lost an election and he is a psycho who couldn’t admit he lost and tried to get the Vice President and State officials to go along with his scheme so if you care about the Constitution why the fuck are you voting for Trump
What many ways?
You're far better informed that that cum-guzzling liberal shitstain though."i'm not into the intricate details of political debates" < what part of this didn't you understand?