I am from Europe, here from 1989-1990 the death penalty is banned unfortunately
A
Of course, 17 years ago I was falsely accused of "killing" my own wife (more precisely, I made her a sick person), but I had no idea what my health problem was, and although everyone else was fully aware of everything but no one said a word
However, the punishment for this was already taken away from me without any kind of trial, right to speak or defense, which is illegal
I received a serious illness that was considered fatal at the time but is now curable "as a gift" for a case in which although others arranged for the situation to become serious on purpose and although everyone knew about it but no one said anything, I was ultimately held responsible for not knowing anything without any trial and was sentenced to a very severe sentence, which is completely illegal
In my opinion, the death penalty is a maximum deterrent because it is the harshest punishment in the world, so many people do not kill for this reason, although maybe if they did not get the death penalty, they would do it
But look, in the USA everyone runs around like an animal from the cocaine, everyone has a gun without any examination or sometimes registration, of course they do the murder and the criminal mind itself or the mind of a mentally ill serial killer is not the same as the mind of a normal person
Not all murderers are caught, that is not true, the identity of thousands of murderers is still unknown, even at the national level
B
I think that although it is hard to sit in prison for the rest of your life, it is unnecessary for the state to support criminals who are really they have clearly proven the fact of the murder, so they can be executed and so with an unnecessary addition, there are fewer who would otherwise only be at the expense of the state and humanity
Generally, the more murderers kill, the more uninhibited they become in the future, so I would make their medical treatment with antipsychotics mandatory in the case of single murderers who are supposedly released but who do not show any change mentally, I would execute them because they do not change anyway
C
Constant terrorizing and harassment, aberrant torture and any humiliation is a prohibited method of execution in all countries
You can't do this to a convicted person, especially not to someone who is innocently convicted because my ex-wife's family doesn't know how to kick the real murderers and then they kick me and my family together
There is no people's court here, the illegal one is also, only a single Judge independent of everyone can hear the case, not the people
The Jews generally like to use the status quo as a tool of cruelty against the innocent
Someone who is severely tortured and humiliated (although the latter is forbidden) will never recover mentally from the thing better than the established official one.
So either you have to help him recover or if he can't, you have to leave him alone, so that he can work as much as he can from the many and long traumas.
If this doesn't happen, the person will never be able to recover mentally from where he was thrown.
It is understandable to be angry if someone killed your mother or father and you feel anger and would not ask for a pardon for their killer except in a conceptual procedure where they do not sentence the killer to death but only someone they want to make an innocent "example" from him or her.
This is not fair at all.
D
Innocent people are executed, usually for this reason they spend about 20-30 years in pretrial detention because if there is no direct evidence or a confession then there is always a chance of error and it is a serious mistake if a person sits or is executed for 20-30 years innocently for a crime he did not commit
DNA erasure is an act against humanity or genocide in the case of a mass action
No one asked for your money dear, and no one's money, so the person cannot be held responsible in this matter.
E
If labor camps were brought back to Europe, whether in the form of a Concentration camps or a Gulag system, it would probably be a more profitable business to force prisoners to work because it would be worth it for the state and the time would pass faster for the convict while he serves his sentence. He would also receive some money or a voucher that can be redeemed for his work.
This working system works here, but the problem is that it is not mandatory for everyone, which is a problem because those who do not work are supported by the state.
It is faster to give an injection to a person who cannot be dealt with and is proven guilty, incapable of changing, even if the system helps him, than to keep him on the state's neck.
A
Of course, 17 years ago I was falsely accused of "killing" my own wife (more precisely, I made her a sick person), but I had no idea what my health problem was, and although everyone else was fully aware of everything but no one said a word
However, the punishment for this was already taken away from me without any kind of trial, right to speak or defense, which is illegal
I received a serious illness that was considered fatal at the time but is now curable "as a gift" for a case in which although others arranged for the situation to become serious on purpose and although everyone knew about it but no one said anything, I was ultimately held responsible for not knowing anything without any trial and was sentenced to a very severe sentence, which is completely illegal
In my opinion, the death penalty is a maximum deterrent because it is the harshest punishment in the world, so many people do not kill for this reason, although maybe if they did not get the death penalty, they would do it
But look, in the USA everyone runs around like an animal from the cocaine, everyone has a gun without any examination or sometimes registration, of course they do the murder and the criminal mind itself or the mind of a mentally ill serial killer is not the same as the mind of a normal person
Not all murderers are caught, that is not true, the identity of thousands of murderers is still unknown, even at the national level
B
I think that although it is hard to sit in prison for the rest of your life, it is unnecessary for the state to support criminals who are really they have clearly proven the fact of the murder, so they can be executed and so with an unnecessary addition, there are fewer who would otherwise only be at the expense of the state and humanity
Generally, the more murderers kill, the more uninhibited they become in the future, so I would make their medical treatment with antipsychotics mandatory in the case of single murderers who are supposedly released but who do not show any change mentally, I would execute them because they do not change anyway
C
Constant terrorizing and harassment, aberrant torture and any humiliation is a prohibited method of execution in all countries
You can't do this to a convicted person, especially not to someone who is innocently convicted because my ex-wife's family doesn't know how to kick the real murderers and then they kick me and my family together
There is no people's court here, the illegal one is also, only a single Judge independent of everyone can hear the case, not the people
The Jews generally like to use the status quo as a tool of cruelty against the innocent
Someone who is severely tortured and humiliated (although the latter is forbidden) will never recover mentally from the thing better than the established official one.
So either you have to help him recover or if he can't, you have to leave him alone, so that he can work as much as he can from the many and long traumas.
If this doesn't happen, the person will never be able to recover mentally from where he was thrown.
It is understandable to be angry if someone killed your mother or father and you feel anger and would not ask for a pardon for their killer except in a conceptual procedure where they do not sentence the killer to death but only someone they want to make an innocent "example" from him or her.
This is not fair at all.
D
Innocent people are executed, usually for this reason they spend about 20-30 years in pretrial detention because if there is no direct evidence or a confession then there is always a chance of error and it is a serious mistake if a person sits or is executed for 20-30 years innocently for a crime he did not commit
DNA erasure is an act against humanity or genocide in the case of a mass action
No one asked for your money dear, and no one's money, so the person cannot be held responsible in this matter.
E
If labor camps were brought back to Europe, whether in the form of a Concentration camps or a Gulag system, it would probably be a more profitable business to force prisoners to work because it would be worth it for the state and the time would pass faster for the convict while he serves his sentence. He would also receive some money or a voucher that can be redeemed for his work.
This working system works here, but the problem is that it is not mandatory for everyone, which is a problem because those who do not work are supported by the state.
It is faster to give an injection to a person who cannot be dealt with and is proven guilty, incapable of changing, even if the system helps him, than to keep him on the state's neck.
