• Adults Only Website 18+

    If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.

    We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.

    We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.

    Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.

    We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.

    By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.

I've changed my mind about Charlie Kirk's assassination. Here's why.

Shaitan Al Tawakoni

It ain't that fuckin serious...
Alright. I won't pretend that I don't like a good conspiracy theory, but at first glance I thought this killing was pretty cut and dried. "Whacko leftist extremist makes a lucky shot" made perfect sense. However... After looking at the whole official story closer, a lot of what they're telling us about the technical aspects makes no sense.

They're saying that Robinson walked to his position with the rifle disassembled in his pants. They're saying he assembled the rifle, made the shot and then disassembled the firearm again. He jumped off the roof (with no rifle in his hand) and RAN away. (How do you run with a rifle in your pants?)

The next stage of the story is that he reassembled the rifle (even though he left the screwdriver he supposedly disassembled it with on the roof) and left the rifle in the woods, in a box, and wrapped in a towel.

Now. I am an expert in small arms, and a gunsmith. They are claiming that he removed the barrel from a Mauser 98 action with a screwdriver. That is IMPOSSIBLE. He could have removed the complete barreled action from the stock, but even those two pieces would be very bulky and almost impossible to smuggle in your pants, and you damn sure couldn't run that way. And why reassemble the rifle (without the tool he left behind on the roof) simply to dump it?

I don't know exactly what's going on, but the official account of what happened REEKS.
 
So the official account as I've laid it out still makes perfect sense to you? You can't be serious.
My head is clear enough that I don't need it to make sense yet. Let the investigation conclude, you ain't Columbo.
1758048447310.webp
 
Alright. I won't pretend that I don't like a good conspiracy theory, but at first glance I thought this killing was pretty cut and dried. "Whacko leftist extremist makes a lucky shot" made perfect sense. However... After looking at the whole official story closer, a lot of what they're telling us about the technical aspects makes no sense.

They're saying that Robinson walked to his position with the rifle disassembled in his pants. They're saying he assembled the rifle, made the shot and then disassembled the firearm again. He jumped off the roof (with no rifle in his hand) and RAN away. (How do you run with a rifle in your pants?)

The next stage of the story is that he reassembled the rifle (even though he left the screwdriver he supposedly disassembled it with on the roof) and left the rifle in the woods, in a box, and wrapped in a towel.

Now. I am an expert in small arms, and a gunsmith. They are claiming that he removed the barrel from a Mauser 98 action with a screwdriver. That is IMPOSSIBLE. He could have removed the complete barreled action from the stock, but even those two pieces would be very bulky and almost impossible to smuggle in your pants, and you damn sure couldn't run that way. And why reassemble the rifle (without the tool he left behind on the roof) simply to dump it?

I don't know exactly what's going on, but the official account of what happened REEKS.
Listen, chasin’ the truth ain’t about doubting the facts, it’s about not just swallowin’ the stories people chuck at ya. When someone’s pinned as the ‘only one to blame,’ ask yourself if they’re just a pawn in a game run by bigger forces.

The real question ain’t who did it, it’s who comes out on top, usually tells ya more than the act itself.

I don’t buy that Tyler was the shooter, nah... he was just the fall guy, standin’ on the roof so everyone could spot him.

Charlie Kirk even told a mate he was scared Israel might come after him, and folks close to Trump reckon he feels the same.

At the very least, it’s worth givin’ that a proper think. The point ain’t whether Tyler Robison offed Charlie Kirk, it’s about figurin’ out who really did it and who’s gettin’ the benefit in the end.
 
He jumped off the roof (with no rifle in his hand) and RAN away.
I called up that video of the person fleeing across a roof etc., again and watched it, playback speed at 0.25. The suspect DOES carry something, a package with the length of what could be the rifle, sort of slung across his body - he handled it quite deftly while climbing down from the roof - once standing upon the ground, he rearranged the package and made off, lugging it with one hand, sometimes dragging it over the grass, the maneuvering slowed him down considerably.

 
Last edited:
I'm just happy the radical fuck died from a gun since he said that gun deaths are worth it. Can you say karma? The details don't really matter. Nuts with guns kill people. If you do not keep the guns away from the nuts are there will be many more charlie kirks dying for the cause. No need to cry over it.
 
Oh, tranny got a temper.
If you really thought I was a tranny you'd have been asking me for nudes already. Just stop, little guy. You said you had two other accounts here, so how you haven't been banned already is beyond me.

N
I'm just happy the radical fuck died from a gun since he said that gun deaths are worth it. Can you say karma? The details don't really matter. Nuts with guns kill people. If you do not keep the guns away from the nuts are there will be many more charlie kirks dying for the cause. No need to cry over it.
Nuts with guns are the ones keeping this country safe... spend a little time in the military and you'd know.
 
I'm just happy the radical fuck died from a gun since he said that gun deaths are worth it. Can you say karma? The details don't really matter. Nuts with guns kill people. If you do not keep the guns away from the nuts are there will be many more charlie kirks dying for the cause. No need to cry over it.
What else did he say about gun deaths? Or perhaps how to reduce mass shootings? Any other gun insight you retained?

You’re just parroting memes that you’ve seen in the last week and perpetuating out of context perspective. Which makes you not only unoriginal, but unable to develop your own critical thought.

Ergo, your comment is intended to incite a reaction. Weak effort.
 
Back
Top