• Adults Only Website 18+

    If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.

    We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.

    We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.

    Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.

    We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.

    By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.

bizarre Another Christian Nut

Out of all the people groups in the world, christians are the worst
Fucking obtuse cunt.......go learn about the evils of islam amd what they preach! When they eventually take over your country you'll have 3 options.....
1. Convert to islam.
2. Pay the jizyah(additional tax to live in your own country as a Christian or atheist)
3. Execution by beheading.

After that your wife/gf children will be sex slaves.

Christianity doesn't seem so harsh now does it you moron!
 
I grew up in evangelicalism. Bought a few of John MacArthur books. Bottom line is as long as you have denominations and different branches of Christianity then he can insist on his denomination not allowing women to preach. Just like Catholics or Orthodox do. Just as they all have their own views on baptism whether for believers or infants. The list could go on. The problem is that each denomination says what it believes and thinks everyone else (other denominations or branches of Christianity) should follow suit—as if they speak for the whole church all over the world. But it is issues precisely like this that there are denominations that separate Christians into these conclaves. Evangelicals have completely forgot there is "The Church" (universal) and churches (individual branches and different beliefs and teachings and denominations within those branches). It’s one of the reasons I will never be a part of organized Christianity again. So if he wants to believe that, he can believe that. Just like he can have all kinds of specific beliefs both theological and ethical which he should not foist upon the other branches or denominations nor they on him. Drives me nuts how they don’t get this.
 
matriarchy is the true nature, patriarchy is resistance based and doesn’t work as efficiently.
(ie, father is head of household and is sole bread winner)
aincent egyptians believed the woman was above men, the men married into the royalty instead of woman i believe ,
Egyptian kings claimed a right to the throne through marriage to the eldest Egyptian princess. By marriage, she transmitted the crown to her husband, but he only acted as her executive agent. The pharaohs, as well as the leaders of smaller localities, adhered to this matriarchal system.


lalita karoli has a great video on this.



go ahead call me whatever name you need to to feel better and self soothe,
but matriarchy isn’t one rules over the other ,
it’s both work together ,
equally.

natural nature law.
the mother and father eagle don’t fight over who “stays in the kitchen” so to say.
they both get the fish and warm the eggs.
but patriarchy has ppl convinced matriarchal living is evil, somehow something to immediately react to as some sort of threat. (it threatens the patriarchy, the false inversion. the thing that doesn’t works existence. the parasite. this is spiritual war ppl).
y’all are controlled so bad and think u know it all lol.
hope people realize the bible has been mutilated beyond legibility to what it truly means
(gnostic interpretations).
yet masses don’t care.
they love to rely on another man’s words instead of your own heart and soul.
(ahh, men… kinda gay ain’t it?)
have a great day. love. <<<333
 
matriarchy is the true nature, patriarchy is resistance based and doesn’t work as efficiently.
(ie, father is head of household and is sole bread winner)
aincent egyptians believed the woman was above men, the men married into the royalty instead of woman i believe ,
Egyptian kings claimed a right to the throne through marriage to the eldest Egyptian princess. By marriage, she transmitted the crown to her husband, but he only acted as her executive agent. The pharaohs, as well as the leaders of smaller localities, adhered to this matriarchal system.


lalita karoli has a great video on this.



go ahead call me whatever name you need to to feel better and self soothe,
but matriarchy isn’t one rules over the other ,

it’s both work together ,
equally.

natural nature law.
the mother and father eagle don’t fight over who “stays in the kitchen” so to say.

they both get the fish and warm the eggs.
but patriarchy has ppl convinced matriarchal living is evil, somehow something to immediately react to as some sort of threat. (it threatens the patriarchy, the false inversion. the thing that doesn’t works existence. the parasite. this is spiritual war ppl).
y’all are controlled so bad and think u know it all lol.
hope people realize the bible has been mutilated beyond legibility to what it truly means
(gnostic interpretations).
yet masses don’t care.
they love to rely on another man’s words instead of your own heart and soul.
(ahh, men… kinda gay ain’t it?)
have a great day. love. <<<333

No need to call you names. You expressed yourself nicely and even included history in your explanation. Are you agnostic?
 
No need to call you names. You expressed yourself nicely and even included history in your explanation. Are you agnostic?
that’s as close as a description i could get with.
i don’t like labels but id guess so.
there’s definitely something operating at higher levels but i also believe we’re somehow our own god/angel/alien/hero.
in a microcosm/macrocosm way, it’s all one.
you have to just know/ be wise on what i’m saying as it’s something beyond what words can explain.

the closest thing to god in an “outside” source is mushrooms.
atp they’re being lab altered so i would say they were the closest thing. not so sure anymore.

i personally strongly dislike most christian’s, very helpless,
people infront of them could be getting stabbed to death and they’d sit and scream “GOD HELP US!!!”
whole time just filming or standing there.
very passive people.
(not that i’d expect them to play hero but u get what i mean)
idk where i was going with that, ik it’s not all christian’s that behave in that manner but it’s enough to want to keep my distance,
coupled with the fact i’ve attempted church and even jehovas witnesses and it all has this weird cult/hive mind vibe.
whatever god truly is , it’s not in those rooms.

if anything churches are conducting straight up rituals. no one will bat an eye at drinking the blood and eating the body of a martyr,
the bell ringings and periodic prey-er chanting. sigils and whatever else…

…only to then gaslight u to believe everyone else are the heretic witches. :unreal:

again part of the inversion to create an aversion to the natural magick we are. true energy, sovereign,
not needing to ask sky daddy for things,
or forgiveness all the time.

lalita karoli said this before and i completely agree:
it’s to a degree playing on some weird sexual perversion with the punishment and being a “bad dirty sinner” needing forgiveness and permission all the time.

not teaching self reliance and to be a true seer. to not rely on your own vision basically.
“walking in faith not by sight” is bullshit.
at times yes i’ve had to walk by faith even tho things looked like shit but i always knew/had a feeling in my heart it’d be okay/i was capable/ meant for more.
it was never being 100% blind.

idk where i’m going with this again, it’s late and i’m passionate XD hope it’s coherent .
thanks for the compliment on me expressing myself well and the respectful nature. would love to hear what u think :):cool::D

to end it;
i cant say what god is, all i know is that i know nothing.

it isn’t a good or bad thing,
“god” and “satan” are one, source energy.
humans made up the archetype is the best i can say for that.
wbu are u agnostic?
what are ur thoughts on religion/ god/ spirituality in general ?
ever done shrooms?

do tell…

do tell…
 
that’s as close as a description i could get with.
i don’t like labels but id guess so.
there’s definitely something operating at higher levels but i also believe we’re somehow our own god/angel/alien/hero.
in a microcosm/macrocosm way, it’s all one.
you have to just know/ be wise on what i’m saying as it’s something beyond what words can explain.

the closest thing to god in an “outside” source is mushrooms.
atp they’re being lab altered so i would say they were the closest thing. not so sure anymore.


i personally strongly dislike most christian’s, very helpless,
people infront of them could be getting stabbed to death and they’d sit and scream “GOD HELP US!!!”
whole time just filming or standing there.

very passive people.
(not that i’d expect them to play hero but u get what i mean)
idk where i was going with that, ik it’s not all christian’s that behave in that manner but it’s enough to want to keep my distance,

coupled with the fact i’ve attempted church and even jehovas witnesses and it all has this weird cult/hive mind vibe.
whatever god truly is , it’s not in those rooms.

if anything churches are conducting straight up rituals. no one will bat an eye at drinking the blood and eating the body of a martyr,
the bell ringings and periodic prey-er chanting. sigils and whatever else…

…only to then gaslight u to believe everyone else are the heretic witches. :unreal:

again part of the inversion to create an aversion to the natural magick we are. true energy, sovereign,
not needing to ask sky daddy for things,

or forgiveness all the time.

lalita karoli said this before and i completely agree:
it’s to a degree playing on some weird sexual perversion with the punishment and being a “bad dirty sinner” needing forgiveness and permission all the time.

not teaching self reliance and to be a true seer. to not rely on your own vision basically.
“walking in faith not by sight” is bullshit.
at times yes i’ve had to walk by faith even tho things looked like shit but i always knew/had a feeling in my heart it’d be okay/i was capable/ meant for more.

it was never being 100% blind.

idk where i’m going with this again, it’s late and i’m passionate XD hope it’s coherent .
thanks for the compliment on me expressing myself well and the respectful nature. would love to hear what u think :):cool::D

to end it;
i cant say what god is, all i know is that i know nothing.

it isn’t a good or bad thing,
“god” and “satan” are one, source energy.
humans made up the archetype is the best i can say for that.
wbu are u agnostic?
what are ur thoughts on religion/ god/ spirituality in general ?
ever done shrooms?

do tell…

do tell…
I’m a nonbeliever. Religion is man made. I believe in science. As a physician I like challenging Christians with the scenario of ‘If your child collapses in front of me, do you want me to kneel beside them and start reciting the bible or implement my scientific medical skills’.
I’ve done shrooms once
 
At the end of the day Christianity is one of the foremost organised religions of the world. For the English-speaking world Christian or not it's influence is unquestionable and often overlooked. In the non-English speaking parts of the world the church is even more ever present with sole missionaries often doing reason defying feats and drawing throngs of believers. Within a generation they can convert whole geographic expanses to their creed as has heppened in huge swathes of India in the northeast, north , south and elsewhere.

It's roman catholic branch is more patriarchal than it's "eastern Christian" or Greek branch which gives more space to the worship of mary or her images and generally is not unappreciative of her "worship". It would follow from this that women are not allowed to preach atleast not in any meaningful manner that recognises it as "preaching".

After all if one is to exalt a male deity or god or god-equivalent or even his messenger if one is true who else than another man who can put oneself in his shoes? Perhaps a consort of the said male can be good and true as well. But since mary's position is contested in the western Christian tradition due to force of history, events, and exigencies of the time during it's development women are not preachers there, nor can be. It might open up in the future as it has in practise "de facto" if i may risk sounding pompous.

Take for instance, the most famous "preachers" of Christianity in India are women in the form of nuns or "sisters of charity" and all vie to be like the Mother Teresa and very likely exceed her "holiness" in their own small ways brown skinned or not.

A recent event in which nuns from the southern Indian state from Kerala were arrested by state to the north, Chattisgarh with a large tribal population caused a huge furore. Here is a clip of multiple parliamentarians chiefly from the Indian National Congress ,and Communist Party of India(Marxist faction) condemning the arrest. The charges are grievous if proven and include human trafficking and "forced conversion" which is commonly though to include acts that apply pressure or setting preconditions like "providing succour from ailments" or financial or material help aimed at "religious education" being given only once the poor tribal folk convert. Now I'm divided on this issue and the law should apply equally to all irrespective of their position. But it is worth pointing out that India still has a British holdover or rather colonial holdover and we cannot see or more accurately cannot afford to perform an injustice or seeming injustice on women wearing the habit. In this the catholic "preachers" are given "special" AKA favourable treatment.

There has been through history been the occasional or even widespread and brazen use of force, fraud, or coercion on people to convert to Christianity in India (a sweeping statement but I am afraid there is some truth to it) continuing from it's first adherents in India (which were likely Jewish traders in Cochin who were converted by the historical Thomas or someone) ,. Something which would cease if the spiritual "church of churches" at the Vatican curtail the often errant temporal churches far and wide which draw authority from it.






So I would not worry too much about the man's speech from that lectern or his interpretation of the verses which again I take no great offense to nor would encourage anyone to take offense to.

Christ is alive and well at least in India and wields great political influence here and has multitudes of followers who keep exhorting others to follow his example.

If anything the only thing that i dislike about Christianity is that it has been overtaken by this very virulent mob of white nationalists who are nationless, given to violent acts or at least celebrating them or considering them appropriate, they don't respect the church or "christian values" yet claim exclusive right to expound their Christian identity and whiteness while not paying obeisance to the very institution that ensured their existence as a homogenous mass in the middle ages right down to at least the beginning of the modern era. They view of "humanity" excludes people based on nationality, race, sex, and creed or some arbitrary label they may attach to a group based on their imagined otherness. If anything this is problematic but it's healthy in a very narrow sense in that it ensures their doom unless they are true in their feelings of superiority. They are not a good example of brotherhood or humanism or fraternal relations between peoples. This is one of the reason why I shun them.

I am greatly apprehensive of these brusque and brash outwardly Christian folks who use their religion in such a vulgar display of irreligious acts. I don't think they will inherit the catholic church in the future or the world if the old adage is true , "... meek ... shall inherit the earth"(sic).


Take it in a commonsense manner. If a woman is the head of the household at least in all matters domestic or internal to the house including maintenance of stores, sustenance, and preaching morals and maintaining standards of good behaviour with guests and so forth

... is it not enough? Why does one have to point to her absence from the traditional male domain to sow a sense of injustice in her or make the adherents who are merely following doctrine without prejudice to their actual sense of morality which may otherwise be supportive of women in different spheres of activity according to the mores of the time and the prevailing morality which is irreligious or science-driven or feministic or cultural Marxist or conservative or the like.

Now I'm no Christian but "comparative religion" was a topic of study in a subject i studied in undergraduate school albeit briefly. I also enjoy studying history and a study of history is often incomplete or colourless without accounting for the religion of the people being studied or their "ethical/moral/spiritual codes".

Preaching is an antiquated method of spreading the "good news" in Christianity. I don't see many preachers who are not scandalised in the present day due to their personal foibles. I don't view it too favourably. Human beings may be created in the image of god according to christian doctrine but our lived experience tells us they are more than likely to commit acts which are ungodly. Hence expiation, repentance, and guilt for the perpetrator and forgiveness are expected from the sufferer in Christianity.

I have a deep and abiding respect for an institution that has imparts such values. They are not conducive to the maintenance of law and order or a strong polity or state and no country that is Christian in character can for that reason be strong or effectively curb injustices or wrongful acts. But it is enough to feed a man's soul. The thought that there exists forgiveness, that wrongful acts can be erased from one's bad karma by the accumulation of virtue. It is destructive of a healthy respect for law among the non-believers though as they are free of such moral restraints and since society is becoming more irreligious than religious by the day and preaching is not imparted seriously without use of gimmicks or use of magical thinking to the secular mind or even fabrications to the pragmatist such as "sick people being instantly cured" or driven to an epiphany by the grace of god or some such.

Rituals have their place though. Imagine old societies where language was not well developed or printing or mass media as we know today was non-existent. Ideas or doctrine of institutions was spread through rituals or customs , a form of collective wisdom which was tested on the field and might have served many purposes which an imaginative person can think about at leisure.
Out of all the people groups in the world, christians are the worst
that is a interesting observation. Might i ask who in your opinion are the worst and why
Sounds about right, they do all the horrible shit that other people do but then pray to their fairy on sundays.. true psychos
that sounds a lot like the religion they follow has become a bit vacuous, unable to impart good values if what you say they did is true or they may just be wolves in sheepskin and have a twisted sense of the religion they deign to follow outwardly. I don't think such folks should put off people from being Christian just like the bad cops who wrongfully shoot or molest unarmed civilians should not put off policemen from performing their duties effectively. I do have doubts on whether Christianity has a spiritual core. The actions of it's adherents make me think they might even if the religion does not to one who skims the surface.
Who lives in his mom's basement and goes by the pronouns dumb and ass
ohh don't be too harsh he is harmless
the lady has co-opted the name of our holy mother goddess, the celestial consort of Shiva who has countless names as her own and who represents Shakti. It's not irregular but a bit concerning as one would not expect a white female to go towards eastern spirituality as a normal course. Hope she is well.

P.S I listened to her video, it made little sense but she does have things that would cause hurt, dismay, or pain(both physical and psychological) in her life. Oh, how she suffers! Can't help but feel compassion to her. I would not dare sent anything more than heartfelt prayers her way though. She seems a bit cuckoo.


This last name points to her spiritual discipline being derived from a placename or someone who resided there... we know of a certain personage who drew adherents from far and wide here and who had in particular throngs of white women who he treated with particular care and spoilt them, "as a father spoils his firstborn". My personal views on his practise are not of any consequence but he(Neem Karoli Baba) was, safe to say, heterodox.

“god” and “satan” are one, source energy.
that's an interesting observation. If I were to build on "Lalita Karoli's" observation that society is matriarchy and males often mentally "rape" females by their "male gaze" and there is "rape culture". I would exhort her to view the human, or even all matter as a form of illusion that causes suffering and to look beyond matter or the ephemeral towards the immanent subtle true nature which is not matter which and which may be a god. As a result of this I don't think we can view god and the bad guy call him "satan" if you will as the christians do as "energy". There is no source to god, he exists without a second, he is beyond thought, matter, conception, and is infinite. He is unmanifest and when he has a creative urge or wills it, the feminine aspect pervades as the universe and as energy. A mother may be conceived as a concrete example of this feminine which is why motherhood is exalted in our tradition. Now a mother may have countless progeny as she chooses as the manifestation of divinity is delegated to her. So satan in out eastern system is not someone apart from "god's children" but since god is not manifest, satan cannot be god or the same as god. Hope that helps. Just my very amateurish attempt at reasoning out something in my own mind.
 
I’m a nonbeliever. Religion is man made. I believe in science. As a physician I like challenging Christians with the scenario of ‘If your child collapses in front of me, do you want me to kneel beside them and start reciting the bible or implement my scientific medical skills’.
I’ve done shrooms once
science imo is it’s own religion, but respect it more than i would religion XD and good point. that’s a 3rd world country response to a situation, to sit and scream for a god.
 
science imo is it’s own religion, but respect it more than i would religion XD and good point. that’s a 3rd world country response to a situation, to sit and scream for a god.
tbf religion isn’t even that bad , yes manmade… but there’s some solid points.
it’s the way it has been skewed, and made based on being a tool for distraction. mind control indoctrination and spiritual psychosis.
fear of divine punishment and allat.

it’s got some good bits but only when u have the rest of the puzzle.

not to mention the god christian’s worship is false violent and of war. requiring regular blood and burnt sacrifice and one of his very son.
gnostic sim goes on to say there were actually 2 gods but the one before the war blood drinking crazy one got omitted as it wasn’t “good for business” as the church might say.
 
Back
Top