Vwj
NewbieX
Dude, almost all quotes posted have been taken out of context, maybe read the whole quote before you post rubbish on the internet, makes you look truly idiotic,
-
Adults Only Website 18+
If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.
We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.
We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.
Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.
We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.
By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.
Charlie Kirk's assassin captured: Discord communist furfag
- Thread starter D.O.A.
- Start date
SerialApeist
Monkey Connoisseur
I don’t even like the motherfucker. I just know that him being killed because of his opinions is fucked up and can kick off a much larger issue that we don’t need in this country. The fact that you have so little forethought shows you’re nothing more than a retard.
If you think this is what a drywall finisher looks like you need to get a real fucking job and leave your house more
(G.O.A.T.) Tubemonkey
It takes two to orangutango
I'm better than you. I'm also cuter and more skilled in everything.
(G.O.A.T.) Tubemonkey
It takes two to orangutango
No, I know you're not nearly that glorified, you rancid gash.
I make more than most people that went to uni for 4 years. Are you saying trade jobs aren't real jobs?
jack Kevin
Rookie
Well hold on a second I never said I did not understand what could follow. Shit this could be the start of a civil war for you guys. It could incite a much larger wave of violence. People are probably already planning to kill whoever your blue equivalent to that kirk fella is. For my own entertainment I am hoping this sparks off a much larger issue. Maybe you lose your guns, maybe you see political figures getting knocked off left and right on both sides. Maybe protests break out and the people attack each other leaving streets covered in bodies. What ever it is, the population of the US will get what they deserve and what they voted for.
Vwj
NewbieX
I couldn’t be bothered to go into how wrong you are on all those things so I’ve copy/pasted a factcheck words
While he did say many of the statements, some have been misrepresented or not presented with full context.
False Claim of an Asian Slur
A popular post on X incorrectly claimed that Kirk used a slur for Asian people.“That time Charlie Kirk called an Asian woman in the audience ‘c—-’ multiple times,” the post reads, spelling out the slur in full, and accompanied by a montage video from TikTok. “He made millions off of his racism and sexism.”
The video, however, does not show Kirk using the slur. Rather, as an X Community Note explains, Kirk was shouting at Cenk Uygur, a co-host of the Young Turks, a progressive online news show, and using his first name. The two men were at Politicon, an annual nonpartisan political convention, in October 2018.
“I live like a capitalist every single day, Cenk!” Kirk said angrily to Uygur, after Uygur interrupted a debate Kirk was having with the Young Turks’ Hasan Piker about what political views young people should have. “Come on, Cenk, let’s go,” he said later.
The Washington Examiner reported on the exchange at the time, and the Young Turks also posted a clip to YouTube, along with the full debate.
In less than two days, the inaccurate post was viewed more than 16 million times on X.
Civil Rights Act
Multiple readers forwarded us a viral graphic that makes reference to things Kirk said about the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Jewish people, gay people and the Second Amendment. We’ll get to the last three in a bit.Kirk did say that it was a “huge mistake” to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964. As the National Archives explains, the law “prohibited discrimination in public places, provided for the integration of schools and other public facilities, and made employment discrimination illegal.”
“I have a very, very radical view on this, but I can defend it, and I’ve thought about it,” the story quoted Kirk as saying. “We made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s.”
In Kirk’s view, the story explained, the Civil Rights Act has led to a “permanent DEI-type bureaucracy,” referring to diversity, equity and inclusion, that has limited free speech.
The story also quoted Kirk as saying that Martin Luther King Jr. was “awful. He’s not a good person. He said one good thing he actually didn’t believe.”
Those comments are not available in the recordings posted to YouTube of the conference that year. The reporter who wrote the Wired story, however, confirmed to us that while attending the event as a journalist, he had witnessed the remarks, which were made not on the main stage, but in a smaller conference room.
Kirk also did not dispute the statement when he responded to an email from Wired the day before the story was published. Reading from the email, Kirk introjected to say that it was “true” that he had described King as “a bad guy” and “also true” that it was his “self-described very, very radical view that the country made a mistake when it passed the Civil Rights Act.”
When the email asked why Kirk believes passing the legislation was a mistake, Kirk said, “Now, again, apparently, they don’t listen to the show. Because we do that at least once a week, right? Once a week, we talk about why the Civil Rights Act was a mistake.”
A few days later, Kirk released an 82-minute podcast episode titled, “The Myth of MLK,” which in part discusses “how the ‘MLK Myth’ keeps America shackled to destructive 1960s laws that have replaced the original U.S. Constitution,” according to the summary description on the podcast’s website.
Later that year, Kirk echoed similar sentiments about the Civil Rights Act. The legislation, he said on his podcast in April 2024, “created a beast, and that beast has now turned into an anti-white weapon.”
‘Jewish Money’
The viral graphic alleges that Kirk, who was a strong supporter of Israel but had been accused of antisemitism numerous times during his career, “blamed ‘Jewish money’ for ruining American culture.” We did not immediately find instances of Kirk using the specific phrase “Jewish money,” but he repeatedly made similar remarks regarding the funding of liberal causes or institutions.Weeks after the Oct. 7 attack on Israel in 2023, Kirk argued in an Oct. 26 episode of his podcast that Jews had funded antisemitism in the U.S. by supporting liberal causes.
“Jewish donors have a lot of explaining to do. A lot of decoupling to do,” he said. “Because Jewish donors have been the No. 1 funding mechanism of radical, open border neoliberal quasi-Marxist policies, cultural institutions and nonprofits. This is a beast created by secular Jews. And now it’s coming for Jews, and they’re like, ‘What on Earth happened?’ And it’s not just the colleges. It’s the nonprofits, it’s the movies, it’s Hollywood, it’s all of it.”
About two weeks later, Kirk again made a similar argument.
“Jews have been some of the largest funders of cultural Marxist ideas and supporters of those ideas over the last 30 or 40 years. Stop supporting causes that hate you,” he said on his podcast. “Until you cleanse that ideology from the hierarchy in the academic elite of the West, there will not be a safe future. I’m not going to say Israel won’t exist, but Israel will be in jeopardy as long as the Western children, children of the West, are being taught, with primarily Jewish dollars, subsidizing it, to view everything through oppressor/ oppressed dynamic. Until you shed that ideology, you will not be able to build the case for Israel, because they view Israel as an oppressor.”
In another podcast 10 days after that, Kirk returned to the topic when defending Elon Musk from complaints of antisemitism, agreeing with part of a controversial X post that Musk had called “the actual truth.” Kirk also said he agreed with conservative commentator Tucker Carlson that Jewish Americans “have primarily been financing cultural Marxist ideas.”
“Some of the largest financiers of left-wing, anti-white causes have been Jewish Americans,” Kirk said.
In the same episode, Kirk rejected complaints that he was antisemitic, saying that in earlier episodes he had said he was “glad that Jewish Americans are reconsidering their financing of cultural Marxism, and people misunderstood it intentionally and slandered us as being antisemites.”
“Cultural Marxism” is considered by some, including the Southern Poverty Law Center, as an antisemitic conspiracy theory. At its most extreme, it refers to the idea that a small group of Jewish immigrants in the U.S. worked to subvert Christian culture in America and spread progressive values.
The phrase sometimes is “a colloquial analogy for political correctness” and is “often used, without antisemitic intention, to describe liberals, progressive movements and others,” the Antisemitism Policy Trust, a U.K. nonprofit, explained in a 2020 briefing. “However, in reality, it is a shadowy term openly used by antisemites, neo-Nazis and others with nefarious intentions.” The group “strongly recommends” that people avoid using the phrase.
Gay People
The graphic goes on to say of Kirk, “He said gay people are ‘destructive’ and endorsed having them put to death.”The source is not clear, as we couldn’t find anything relevant that used the “destructive” word. But part of that claim could be a reference to something Kirk said while discussing comments about passages in the Bible made by Rachel Anne Accurso, better known as the YouTube personality Ms. Rachel.
In a June 8, 2024, episode of his podcast (at around the 1:00:00 mark), Kirk reacted to Accurso posting a video in which she cited Bible scripture to explain why she had wisheda “Happy Pride” that month to people in the LGBTQ+ community.
“My faith is really important to me, and it’s also one reason why I love every neighbor,” she said in her video. “In Matthew 22, a religious teacher asked Jesus, what’s the most important commandment? And Jesus says, to love God and to ‘love your neighbor as yourself.’” “It doesn’t say love every neighbor except,” she went on to say.
In his reply, Kirk said Accurso left out something else the Bible says. “She’s not totally wrong,” Kirk said. “The first part is Deuteronomy 6:3–5. The second part is Leviticus 19. So you love God, so you must love his law. How do you love somebody? You love them by telling them the truth, not by confirming or affirming their sin.”
He continued: “And it says, by the way, Ms. Rachel, might want to crack open that Bible of yours, in a lesser reference, part of the same part of scripture is in Leviticus 18, is that thou shall lay with another man shall be stoned to death, just saying. So, Ms. Rachel, you quote Leviticus 19, love your neighbor as yourself. The chapter before affirms God’s perfect law when it comes to sexual matters.”
After backlash from Kirk supporters, the author Stephen King, who had posted on X on Sept. 11 that Kirk had “advocated stoning gays to death,” retracted his claim and apologized. King said, “What [Kirk] actually demonstrated was how some people cherry-pick Biblical passages.”
I'm sorry, but that's just not true. Almost anyone with some experience with a hunting rifle could easily pull off that shot. I could teach almost anybody to hit a target at 200+ yards in a few minutes. I know this for a fact because I've done exactly that many times. He had the right tool, perfect conditions, and the perfect nest position.
Vwj
NewbieX
Part 2
Kirk did say that at a TPUSA Faith event in Utah on April 5, 2023. The event was held days after three children and three adults were killed in a school shooting in Nashville.
Video from the event shows Kirk being asked by an audience member how to make the point that protecting the Second Amendment is important. Kirk responded that the amendment “is there, God forbid, so that you can defend yourself against a tyrannical government.” But “having an armed citizenry comes with a price, and that is part of liberty,” he said.
“You will never live in a society when you have an armed citizenry and you won’t have a single gun death,” Kirk later said. “That is nonsense. It’s drivel. But I am — I think it’s worth it. I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational. Nobody talks like this. They live in a complete alternate universe.”
Yes, he did. In the Oct. 31, 2022, episode of his show (at around 53:00 in the video), Kirk said the attack on Paul Pelosi was “awful” and “not right,” but he said that someone should bail out the assailer, David DePape, because cashless bail policies in certain cities allowed other people to commit crimes and be released from custody pending trial.
“And why is he still in jail? Why has he not been bailed out?” Kirk asked. “By the way, if some amazing patriot out there in San Francisco or the Bay Area wants to really be a midterm hero, someone should go and bail this guy out. I bet his bail’s like 30[,000] or 40,000 bucks. Bail him out, and then go ask him some questions.”
“I’m not qualifying it. I think it’s awful. It’s not right,” Kirk said about the attack on Pelosi, who suffered a skull fracture after being hit in the head with a hammer. “But why is it that in Chicago you’re able to commit murder and be out the next day? Why is it that you’re able to trespass, second-degree murder, arson, threaten a public official, cashless bail. This happens all over San Francisco. But if you go after the Pelosis, oh, you’re [not] let out immediately. Got it.”
After the attack on Oct. 28, 2022, DePape was arrested and placed on a federal hold. He was later convicted on assault- and kidnapping-related charges in separate federal and state trials, and was sentenced to 30 years in prison by a federal judge and life in prison without parole by a state judge. DePape told officers he intended to apprehend then Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who was not at her San Francisco home when DePape broke in.
As for cashless bail in Chicago, we’ve writtenthat an Illinois law that went into effect in September 2023 eliminated cash bail for all offenses, but still allows judges to detain a person because of the nature of the crime, or because the person is considered a flight risk or poses a threat to “any other person or the community.”
Second Amendment
Finally, the graphic says, “He said the 2nd amendment is worth the cost of ‘some gun deaths.’”Kirk did say that at a TPUSA Faith event in Utah on April 5, 2023. The event was held days after three children and three adults were killed in a school shooting in Nashville.
Video from the event shows Kirk being asked by an audience member how to make the point that protecting the Second Amendment is important. Kirk responded that the amendment “is there, God forbid, so that you can defend yourself against a tyrannical government.” But “having an armed citizenry comes with a price, and that is part of liberty,” he said.
“You will never live in a society when you have an armed citizenry and you won’t have a single gun death,” Kirk later said. “That is nonsense. It’s drivel. But I am — I think it’s worth it. I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational. Nobody talks like this. They live in a complete alternate universe.”
Paul Pelosi Attack
Another reader asked, presumably based on other online posts, “When Nancy Pelosi’s husband was attacked with a hammer, did Kirk encourage his audience to contribute to bail out [the] attacker?”Yes, he did. In the Oct. 31, 2022, episode of his show (at around 53:00 in the video), Kirk said the attack on Paul Pelosi was “awful” and “not right,” but he said that someone should bail out the assailer, David DePape, because cashless bail policies in certain cities allowed other people to commit crimes and be released from custody pending trial.
“And why is he still in jail? Why has he not been bailed out?” Kirk asked. “By the way, if some amazing patriot out there in San Francisco or the Bay Area wants to really be a midterm hero, someone should go and bail this guy out. I bet his bail’s like 30[,000] or 40,000 bucks. Bail him out, and then go ask him some questions.”
“I’m not qualifying it. I think it’s awful. It’s not right,” Kirk said about the attack on Pelosi, who suffered a skull fracture after being hit in the head with a hammer. “But why is it that in Chicago you’re able to commit murder and be out the next day? Why is it that you’re able to trespass, second-degree murder, arson, threaten a public official, cashless bail. This happens all over San Francisco. But if you go after the Pelosis, oh, you’re [not] let out immediately. Got it.”
After the attack on Oct. 28, 2022, DePape was arrested and placed on a federal hold. He was later convicted on assault- and kidnapping-related charges in separate federal and state trials, and was sentenced to 30 years in prison by a federal judge and life in prison without parole by a state judge. DePape told officers he intended to apprehend then Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who was not at her San Francisco home when DePape broke in.
As for cashless bail in Chicago, we’ve writtenthat an Illinois law that went into effect in September 2023 eliminated cash bail for all offenses, but still allows judges to detain a person because of the nature of the crime, or because the person is considered a flight risk or poses a threat to “any other person or the community.”
Let me guess.
You were raised by a Canadian left wing family. Critique a Country you know nothing about and claim the opposing party is guilty of murdering one of their own high ranking activist?
I guess your OFans page is dying or all the dry walling has worn you down.
At that distance, a low grain projectile wouldn't necessarily do a lot of damage, especially if it was an FMJ. It would simply punch a nice little .30 cal hole. And no pro would shoot for the neck, ever. If this was done by a "pro", they suck at their job. Source: Small arms expert.
SerialApeist
Monkey Connoisseur
0 correct statements detected.
Ha! Bitch you have a onlyfans page…You said it yourself.
SerialApeist
Monkey Connoisseur
I hope your country gets taken over by the nearest communist power and you end up starving to death in bread lines
jack Kevin
Rookie
Lol you can hope for what ever you want. You are the one trapped in conflict not me.
SerialApeist
Monkey Connoisseur
I bet your country is full of illegal Muslims that your government is letting rape anybody they want
Sarcasm doesn't register for you does it
Similar threads
