Charlie Kirk's assassin captured: Discord communist furfag

[sleighcake]

yall are a group of collective idiots who think that a 22 yr old can make a precise shot like that😂

 

[sleighcake]

Lefties can celebrate all they want, not only did Kirk die but also the democrats midterms, 2028 election.

cant wait for more nazi deaths 🥰

 

[sleighcake]

Thankfully God sees all the vile, disgusting leftist comments celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk, a man of Faith in God himself. Your time is short

a man of god? thats a fucking joke. he’s getting butt fucked by satan. nazis are dropping like flies. 🥰

 

[John/G\]

View attachment 917622

I’m going to hell man

 

[ZeroK]

a man of god? thats a fucking joke. he’s getting butt fucked by satan. nazis are dropping like flies. 🥰

These clowns still believe in jesus; so why didn't he save Charlie the neck

 

[CrispRatChrisPratt]

fuck your feelings faggot

My thoughts exactly. You're learning. I care as much about Kirk getting popped as I care about your well-being. Cry about it, snowflake.

 

[Fäthër Cörpsë]

yall are a group of collective idiots who think that a 22 yr old can make a precise shot like that😂

You’re fucking dumb to think that’s a difficult shot

 

[δαίμων]

Wait and see approach. How did that pan out for you last November? You were supposed to have this sweeping victory of solidarity for Biden and Harris, right?

Certainly had solidarity. Just not for your leftist bullshit. The ppl are tired of it. Lucky for you and your kind, the right is pretty tolerant and SILENT about your ravings. Just let you do your thing.

But then you come and attack one of us, and try to rub our face in it? That shits not going to bode well for you.

Anyway, all that to say - fuck you and yeah you wait and see what happens at midterms. This country bout to be even MORE red bc of your leftist bs.

It’s kind of wild how tribalism (splitting everything into “us” vs. “them”) creates these paradoxes.

One side will celebrate a figure as a hero of free speech, saying (correctly) that ideas should be challenged without fear of violence.

But then, in the same breath, that support can turn into a warning that the other side’s speech “won’t bode well.”

That’s the cycle... demanding protection for your own voice while hinting at consequences for someone else’s.

But free speech isn’t supposed to be a team prize... it’s a universal principle.

It only really works if it protects everyone, especially the speech we can’t stand.

So the question is: can one truly claim to defend free speech if its application depends entirely on which side is speaking?

 

[Fäthër Cörpsë]

It’s kind of wild how tribalism (splitting everything into “us” vs. “them”) creates these paradoxes.

One side will celebrate a figure as a hero of free speech, saying (correctly) that ideas should be challenged without fear of violence.

But then, in the same breath, that support can turn into a warning that the other side’s speech “won’t bode well.”

That’s the cycle... demanding protection for your own voice while hinting at consequences for someone else’s.

But free speech isn’t supposed to be a team prize... it’s a universal principle.

It only really works if it protects everyone, especially the speech we can’t stand.

So the question is: can one truly claim to defend free speech if its application depends entirely on which side is speaking?

That’s why I said the right just silently observes the left making fools of themselves, bc their freedom of speech and expression are protected. Even if they’re not agreed with.

The boding warnings related to physical attacks being committed from one side to another.

The left does not want to get into a fist fight with the right. It won’t bode well for them.

Also, fuck off Norme deplume sock cunt.

 

[Jay the Butcher]

It’s kind of wild how tribalism (splitting everything into “us” vs. “them”) creates these paradoxes.

One side will celebrate a figure as a hero of free speech, saying (correctly) that ideas should be challenged without fear of violence.

But then, in the same breath, that support can turn into a warning that the other side’s speech “won’t bode well.”

That’s the cycle... demanding protection for your own voice while hinting at consequences for someone else’s.

But free speech isn’t supposed to be a team prize... it’s a universal principle.

It only really works if it protects everyone, especially the speech we can’t stand.

So the question is: can one truly claim to defend free speech if its application depends entirely on which side is speaking?

It won't bode well with moderate democrat voters retard. "Won't bode well" isn't a call for violence or a threat, just the fallout from this.

 

[Vwj]

yall are a group of collective idiots who think that a 22 yr old can make a precise shot like that😂

So a 22 year old that has been taken to the ranges as a child, as his dads a republican who’s served in the police for 27 years, guaranteed he’s been gun trained in safety and firing
A 200 yards shot isn’t hard, plus nobody aims for the neck, so I’d say it was a low and wide head shot or a high and wide chest shot, and at 200 yards it’s difficult to miss a torso unless you got your eyes shut!
At 13-15 I was doing 6in groupings at 1000 yards at 5-6in from the bull (matches are about groupings and not hitting the bull), with a Lee Enfield match rifle with iron sights

 

[δαίμων]

It won't bode well with moderate democrat voters retard. "Won't bode well" isn't a call for violence or a threat, just the fallout from this.

No need for hostility... I was asking about the paradox of defending free speech while also using political outcomes as a weapon to punish dissent.

OPs point about “won’t bode well” being fallout makes sense, but it still frames democracy less as an exchange of ideas and more as a system of retribution... where people are pressured into silence by the threat of collective backlash.

It’s not physical violence, sure, but it is a form of coercion that undermines the pluralism free speech is supposed to protect.

If free speech means being free from fear, doesn’t that also include fear of organized political punishment for certain views?

 

[omeingroin]

These clowns still believe in jesus; so why didn't he save Charlie the neck
View attachment 917636

Seconds before the dolt hit record:
"Are you recording? Make sure to just show his yellow hand and giant red tie"

 

[δαίμων]

That’s why I said the right just silently observes the left making fools of themselves, bc their freedom of speech and expression are protected. Even if they’re not agreed with.

The boding warnings related to physical attacks being committed from one side to another.

The left does not want to get into a fist fight with the right. It won’t bode well for them.

Also, fuck off Norme deplume sock cunt.

Saying the right “just observes” isn’t accurate... there are plenty of examples of violence from that side too, like James Hodgkinson, Kyle Rittenhouse, threats against Gretchen Whitmer, and Vance Luther Boelter who literally just assassinated two Democratic lawmakers in their home in June.

This isn’t really about left vs. right though, it’s about consistency.

You say you’re defending free speech, even for views you hate, but then turn around and use political outcomes as punishment... and now even talk about a “fist fight.” That’s a contradiction.

How do you defend free speech while also leaning on political and physical threats to silence the other side?

If the principle only matters when it’s convenient, is it really a principle... or just a tactic?

You’re literally talking about weaponizing a political party, and you have no moral ground to stand on.

Your hostility and negative reactions don’t really matter... they’re just noise in a conversation already full of cynicism.

I came into this in good faith, unaligned and genuinely curious, only to run straight into the tribalism I was questioning. If your “principles” fall apart the moment they’re examined, then they were never principles... just posturing.

So go ahead and cling to your bitterness and hypocrisy, those are cages you built for yourself, not me.

I’ll take my curiosity elsewhere. Enjoy the echo.

 

[ZeroK]

Seconds before the dolt hit record:
"Are you recording? Make sure to just show his yellow hand and giant red tie"

 

[K.I.T.T.]

a man of god? thats a fucking joke. he’s getting butt fucked by satan. nazis are dropping like flies. 🥰

Wtf are you going on about? Why refer to Charlie Kirk as a "nazi"?

 

[cun1punter]

Hopefully the are wrong again....God willing that hero shooter will never get caught ❤️

Ive been celebrating ever since i saw him splatter, we had a great party here...you seem like him tho..instantly forgettable 🎊🎊🎊🎉🎉

if only it was you instead

 

[Jay the Butcher]

No need for hostility... I was asking about the paradox of defending free speech while also using political outcomes as a weapon to punish dissent.

OPs point about “won’t bode well” being fallout makes sense, but it still frames democracy less as an exchange of ideas and more as a system of retribution... where people are pressured into silence by the threat of collective backlash.

It’s not physical violence, sure, but it is a form of coercion that undermines the pluralism free speech is supposed to protect.

If free speech means being free from fear, doesn’t that also include fear of organized political punishment for certain views?

Killing someone over words, not going to sit well with some voter's wouldnt go far to say retribution, just an outcome.

 

[Chief Queef]

New? I've been here for years bud

 

[Sonnynerd022]

"I think with a high-degree of certainty, we have him," President Donald Trump revealed on Fox & Friends Friday morning. He added that, "essentially, someone who knew him turned him in."

Trump said he hopes the suspect gets the death penalty if found guilty. He also explained how investigators found the suspect — with help from a minister, a member of the U.S. Marshals Service and the suspect's father.

"We have the person that we think is the person we're looking for, but they drove into the police headquarters, and he's there now," Trump said.

Additional:

The writing on the bullet casings read "notices bulge oWo what's this?" "what's this fascists?" "catch" "if you read this you are gay lmao" and others.

Charlie Kirk's suspected assassin identified after fatal shooting of influential conservative voice in Utah

Suspect arrested in Utah killing of Charlie Kirk, conservative speaker and Turning Point USA founder who was fatally shot at Wednesday afternoon event.

www.foxnews.com

he was probaily turned into that by being in leftist shite holes like reddit discord