• Adults Only Website 18+

    If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.

    We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.

    We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.

    Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.

    We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.

    By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.

Climate Change ~ The end of the world...

I remember there was an article in the LIFE library about concepts to live in space, the most were too expensive, difficult etc.
Yes, the entire world would have to work together on something that big. You know that is not gonna happen, unless the end of the world was proven to be soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McM
According to the UN’s own climate models, the Paris deal is predicted to “maybe” decrease global temperatures by three-tenths of one degree, at a projected cost of $100 trillion, over 100 years. Not really a good use of other people's money

Quite clearly, the Paris agreement will have no measurable effect on the climate. If implemented, it will have a huge effect on the lives of billions of mostly poor people – because electricity and energy will be more expensive and those without electricity will be deprived of it for even longer. So even if the claim that man-made carbon dioxide causes dangerous global warming is true (and it is not), the hugely expensive Paris agreement will be damaging and totally futile.

No compelling evidence that human emissions of CO2 will ever be dangerous has been produced by anyone. We only have the tarnished opinions of some scientists, activists and the output of unverified computer models.
The climate changes naturally, and i increasing CO2 concentration has a very small, and to date undetectable, effect on the climate.
Why the developed economies (now excepting the US) are proposing to spend trillions on a non-problem is the real issue and it is entirely political and economic - not scientific. The broad reaction to President Trump's wise move is indicative of the pervasiveness, power, wealth and above all the irrationality of the man-made climate change/global warming alarm movement. Trump may well be judged by history as the man who brought this scam to it's long overdue end.
 
More a concept how masses of humans could live in space without the loss of gravity.
Oh yeah, bong hits and sex with no gravity.
no gravity.gif
 
Do you think humans will create an oasis in space?...what will the earth be like in 1k years?...look how much things have changed in the last 1000 years...

That's a pipe dram man, we can't even exist together in harmony on a single fucking planet the idea everyone is going to hold hands on some cramped cargo hold of a starship is complete bullshit... Unless they send a bunch of weak feminised fags who all know each other.... I got it!! Send only CNN MSNBC anchors to space!
 
Back
Top