I've changed my mind about Charlie Kirk's assassination. Here's why.

[SearCutFAL]

Kirk was a long time non-Semetic pro-Zionist

But had begun accusing Jewish philanthropists of fomenting anti-whiteness
by supporting liberal anti-racism causes like Black Lives Matter, etc.
He had also started in on Palestine/Gaza themes, contrary to pro-Israeli narratives.

He was becoming Disruptive Technology to his Handlers.
Who/When/Where matters not, he's Dead.
Always ask: Who Benefits.

 

[Gevurah]

What's your point? Where does it lead?

I’m not havin’ any of it with you ‘til you answer the question I asked proper. Don’t wanna answer? Fine by me, just proves me point even more.

Answer that and then we can chat about your question.

 

[watertech3995]

Alright. I won't pretend that I don't like a good conspiracy theory, but at first glance I thought this killing was pretty cut and dried. "Whacko leftist extremist makes a lucky shot" made perfect sense. However... After looking at the whole official story closer, a lot of what they're telling us about the technical aspects makes no sense.

They're saying that Robinson walked to his position with the rifle disassembled in his pants. They're saying he assembled the rifle, made the shot and then disassembled the firearm again. He jumped off the roof (with no rifle in his hand) and RAN away. (How do you run with a rifle in your pants?)

The next stage of the story is that he reassembled the rifle (even though he left the screwdriver he supposedly disassembled it with on the roof) and left the rifle in the woods, in a box, and wrapped in a towel.

Now. I am an expert in small arms, and a gunsmith. They are claiming that he removed the barrel from a Mauser 98 action with a screwdriver. That is IMPOSSIBLE. He could have removed the complete barreled action from the stock, but even those two pieces would be very bulky and almost impossible to smuggle in your pants, and you damn sure couldn't run that way. And why reassemble the rifle (without the tool he left behind on the roof) simply to dump it?

I don't know exactly what's going on, but the official account of what happened REEKS.

I never believed the 30.06 story from the audio alone. Let alone not a single person in that crowd looked back towards where they say the shot came from. That narrative might work in France or something. They forgot we shoot in the U.S.

 

[Shaitan Al Tawakoni]

I never believed the 30.06 story from the audio alone. Let alone not a single person in that crowd looked back towards where they say the shot came from. That narrative might work in France or something. They forgot we shoot in the U.S.

Yeah. Something is wrong with the whole story.

 

[mrln]

Alright. I won't pretend that I don't like a good conspiracy theory, but at first glance I thought this killing was pretty cut and dried. "Whacko leftist extremist makes a lucky shot" made perfect sense. However... After looking at the whole official story closer, a lot of what they're telling us about the technical aspects makes no sense.

They're saying that Robinson walked to his position with the rifle disassembled in his pants. They're saying he assembled the rifle, made the shot and then disassembled the firearm again. He jumped off the roof (with no rifle in his hand) and RAN away. (How do you run with a rifle in your pants?)

The next stage of the story is that he reassembled the rifle (even though he left the screwdriver he supposedly disassembled it with on the roof) and left the rifle in the woods, in a box, and wrapped in a towel.

Now. I am an expert in small arms, and a gunsmith. They are claiming that he removed the barrel from a Mauser 98 action with a screwdriver. That is IMPOSSIBLE. He could have removed the complete barreled action from the stock, but even those two pieces would be very bulky and almost impossible to smuggle in your pants, and you damn sure couldn't run that way. And why reassemble the rifle (without the tool he left behind on the roof) simply to dump it?

I don't know exactly what's going on, but the official account of what happened REEKS.

also,when did this kid have a chance to re-sight in his scope?

its been over a month ,whats your beliefs now?
now youve heard plenty of scenarios. saw lots of footage from dif angles.
hear about the exploding mic he was wearing?

 

[Shaitan Al Tawakoni]

also,when did this kid have a chance to re-sight in his scope?

its been over a month ,whats your beliefs now?
now youve heard plenty of scenarios. saw lots of footage from dif angles.
hear about the exploding mic he was wearing?

I think the field is even more cluttered now. With some of the claims he had a falling out with Netanyahu and all of the weird "donations" flying around at TPUSA, I don't think we'll ever get the real story.

It gets even weirder when you start looking into his wife and her family. That's a wacky rabbi(t) hole in itself.

I am definitely doubled down on my belief that the official account is still utter horseshit. The more you look, the less any of it makes sense. The timing, the campus footage, the claimed weapon, how it was found, the wound, none of it makes the slightest bit of sense.

 

[Solomon Kane]

I'm simply pointing out the holes in the "facts" they've given us so far. Nothing more.

Holes?? Just like the Epstein files.

 

[Shaitan Al Tawakoni]

Holes?? Just like the Epstein files.

Yeah. It's pretty clear that no one in power wants those released.

 

[(G.O.A.T.) Tubemonkey]

Holes?? Just like the Epstein files.

You're a pathetic tunnel-visioned clown. You didn't give a fuck about that up until a year ago.

Just so you know, I am loving seeing your distress and emotions. You're weak.

 

[mrln]

I think the field is even more cluttered now. With some of the claims he had a falling out with Netanyahu and all of the weird "donations" flying around at TPUSA, I don't think we'll ever get the real story.

It gets even weirder when you start looking into his wife and her family. That's a wacky rabbi(t) hole in itself.

I am definitely doubled down on my belief that the official account is still utter horseshit. The more you look, the less any of it makes sense. The timing, the campus footage, the claimed weapon, how it was found, the wound, none of it makes the slightest bit of sense.

just the way the govt wants it. seemingly more complicated the more you look at it.
like jfk and 9/11 for example.

 

[Solomon Kane]

You're a pathetic tunnel-visioned clown. You didn't give a fuck about that up until a year ago.

Just so you know, I am loving seeing your distress and emotions. You're weak.

Blah, blah blah... yeah, alot of things are moving sideways nowadays. Just keeping up with the latest.
Schmuck

 

[dwdays]

 

[SPHINCTERPUNCH]

Alright. I won't pretend that I don't like a good conspiracy theory, but at first glance I thought this killing was pretty cut and dried. "Whacko leftist extremist makes a lucky shot" made perfect sense. However... After looking at the whole official story closer, a lot of what they're telling us about the technical aspects makes no sense.

They're saying that Robinson walked to his position with the rifle disassembled in his pants. They're saying he assembled the rifle, made the shot and then disassembled the firearm again. He jumped off the roof (with no rifle in his hand) and RAN away. (How do you run with a rifle in your pants?)

The next stage of the story is that he reassembled the rifle (even though he left the screwdriver he supposedly disassembled it with on the roof) and left the rifle in the woods, in a box, and wrapped in a towel.

Now. I am an expert in small arms, and a gunsmith. They are claiming that he removed the barrel from a Mauser 98 action with a screwdriver. That is IMPOSSIBLE. He could have removed the complete barreled action from the stock, but even those two pieces would be very bulky and almost impossible to smuggle in your pants, and you damn sure couldn't run that way. And why reassemble the rifle (without the tool he left behind on the roof) simply to dump it?

I don't know exactly what's going on, but the official account of what happened REEKS.

Nice! Thank you 4 that Clarification!
Something's up...Something's always up with these MFKRZ!!! It's Nvr Cut and Dry!!!
🤘🤟🤙...SP

 

[Nekromisanthrope666]

Alright. I won't pretend that I don't like a good conspiracy theory, but at first glance I thought this killing was pretty cut and dried. "Whacko leftist extremist makes a lucky shot" made perfect sense. However... After looking at the whole official story closer, a lot of what they're telling us about the technical aspects makes no sense.

They're saying that Robinson walked to his position with the rifle disassembled in his pants. They're saying he assembled the rifle, made the shot and then disassembled the firearm again. He jumped off the roof (with no rifle in his hand) and RAN away. (How do you run with a rifle in your pants?)

The next stage of the story is that he reassembled the rifle (even though he left the screwdriver he supposedly disassembled it with on the roof) and left the rifle in the woods, in a box, and wrapped in a towel.

Now. I am an expert in small arms, and a gunsmith. They are claiming that he removed the barrel from a Mauser 98 action with a screwdriver. That is IMPOSSIBLE. He could have removed the complete barreled action from the stock, but even those two pieces would be very bulky and almost impossible to smuggle in your pants, and you damn sure couldn't run that way. And why reassemble the rifle (without the tool he left behind on the roof) simply to dump it?

I don't know exactly what's going on, but the official account of what happened REEKS.

Facts. I also know alot about firearms and none of this added up at all after watching the videos because the bullet trajectory cleary shows that it hit Charlie in the back right part of His neck and the exit wound appearer out of the left front of his neck where the blood started gushing from. Also if you slow down the video you can see a blood splatter appear at the right of his head behind him before the exit wound appears. Also the way he seized up and fell forward also indicates that he was shot from a 17 degree angle instead of a direct shot as the shooter wasn't facing him dead on. Also the lack of the bullet wound expanding would as it does at longer ranges indicate that it was atleast within 100 yards or less not over 300 yards.