Serious Our UK members have some big problems...

[wiggins]

This case is an absolute outrage. The cops were race traitors.

GREG SHERIDAN

Henry Nowak death: The left is to blame for this terrible tragedy​

Gift this article

21 Comments
Make us preferred on Google
1 hours ago.
Updated 31 minutes ago
The death of 18-year-old university student Henry Nowak is as terrible as anything you’ll ever see. Here is the dialogue as he lies dying on the footpath of a Southampton suburban street, while the police are actually handcuffing him.
“I’ve been stabbed.”

“I don’t think you have mate.”

“I can’t breathe. I can’t breathe.”

“He says he’s been stabbed.”

“No, he hasn’t.”

“I know, but we’ve got to check.”

It’s the most harrowing scene to watch. Nowak is not even given the dignity of being hated or abused. There is just utter indifference to him, the cold, bureaucratic hand of identity politics, which has delivered us not into a land of racial justice, but into Dante’s Inferno, the fourth circle of hell.

Britain’s Opposition Leader, Kemi Badenoch, says Nowak’s killing is a seminal moment that will change Britain profoundly.

Nowak had been stabbed five times by Vickram Digwa, 23, a cold blooded murderer who contrived to tell the police many lies.













Loaded: 99.73%

00:00 / 00:00

'I Don't Think You Have, Mate': Shocking Video Shows Police Treatment of Fatally Wounded Student
Newly released bodycam footage shows how police in Southampton handcuffed the 18-year-old...
more

After the stabbing, Digwa’s brother rang the police to say he and his brother had suffered a racial assault. Digwa was born in Britain of Indian background. His evil crime reflects nothing on his community, only on himself, and to some extent his family. Digwa got his mother to hide the knife. Digwa was later convicted of murder and sentenced to 21 years in prison. His mother was convicted for hiding the knife.


When the Southampton police arrived at the scene, Nowak had already lost much blood, was prone and barely responsive. Digwa was there with his family. The police automatically believed Digwa’s story of racial assault and proceeded to arrest Nowak who, remember, was on the ground and barely responsive, certainly offering no resistance. And so they dragged Nowak across the ground, while he was bleeding to death, forced him to his feet, forced him again to the ground, and handcuffed him behind his back. Litres of blood were accumulating in Nowak’s chest. His wounds, not instantly visible, would have been discovered in the most cursory examination.

An accusation of racism was more important than murder, and the desperate need for first aid.

The incident, in its brutality, bears an uncanny resemblance to the equally shocking death of George Floyd six years ago in Minneapolis. In a scene equally unbearable to watch, Floyd too desperately told the policeman kneeling on his neck: “I can’t breathe” and cried out “Mama”.

First of all, remark that these are two ineffable human tragedies. Be careful with the politics.

Yet we cannot avoid the analysis of what caused Nowak’s death, and what it will do to British politics.












Loaded: 90.94%

Mass chaos floods streets as protesters clash with police over Henry Nowak's murder
Hundreds gathered in the streets of Southampton to protest the killing of Henry Nowak, who was...
more

Floyd’s death caused a worldwide wave of outrage, and spawned the Black Lives Matter movement. Barely two weeks after Floyd’s death, which had nothing to do with Britain, Keir Starmer “took the knee”. British police, trying to control huge BLM demonstrations, also took the knee.

Nigel Farage, leader of Reform UK, says Britain is now a two-tier culture, with two-tier policing. This is not only wrong but dangerous, he argues. Watch out, he says, if large numbers of young white males come to the view the police are hostile to them.

A police officer takes a knee in front of protesters near Downing Street during a Black Lives Matter protest following the death of George Floyd who died in police custody on June 3, 2020. Picture: Reuters.
Starmer denies two-tier policing exists but his denial seems absurd. In Australia, too, there are obvious double standards, but nothing on the scale of the Nowak incident.

From the first, there was something wrong with Black Lives Matter. Hillary Clinton and one or two innocent celebrities said: yes, black lives matter, all lives matter. The BLM movement viciously chastised them: you must only say black lives matter.

In June 2020, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer (then Leader of the Opposition) and deputy leader Angela Rayner took the knee inside a parliamentary office in solidarity with the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement and the global protests sparked by the murder of George Floyd.
Identity politics, like all contemporary left-wing ideology, is simplistic and filled with hatred. It is a bastard child of Marxism which substitutes for capital and labour, and the paint-by-numbers analysis of their power relationship, a new class of oppressor and oppressed. White people are oppressors and can never, by definition, be victims of racism. Non-white people are victims of oppression, and can never be guilty of racism.

 

[wiggins]

Critical Race Theory is its expression in ethnic politics. It reverses the liberal ideal of Martin Luther King who wanted a society in which people were judged by the “content of their character, not the colour of their skin”. CRT means character counts not at all, skin colour is everything. This evil ideology is rejected not just by working class whites, but by millions of immigrants who came to Britain because of the integrity of its justice system.

There’s no doubt there’s been a lot of white racism in the US, Britain and Australia. Racism is evil, purely evil. It’s right to oppose it. However, a racist insult, although there is absolutely no evidence Nowak ever said or did anything racist in his life, is not as evil as murder.

How did we get to the point where the police are so afraid of being accused of racism that they handcuff a dying man, while consoling his murderer, simply because a charge of racism has been levelled? Here’s the ineradicable, undeniable truth of human morality which identity politics can never acknowledge, admit or accommodate. You can’t cure racism with more racism, defeat discrimination with more discrimination, beat prejudice with more prejudice.



Identity politics holds that societies like Britain, the US and Australia are inherently and irredeemably racist, racist in the bones of their power structures. Everything about them therefore, is to be seen through a lens of race and cartoon comic book power structures. This demented ideology produces social polarisation and a sick, toxic brew of multi-directional hatreds. It’s championed by left-wing elites who search for meaning and purpose in the sterile wastelands of ideology.

Yet identity politics has a shocking grip on British institutions. The National Police Chiefs Council’s anti-racism strategy contains the following astonishing words: “Our commitment to racial equity means producing equality of policing outcomes for people from different ethnic groups by responding to individuals and communities according to their specific needs … understanding that these will be racialised … it does not mean treating everyone the same or being colour blind.”

18-year-old student Henry Nowak was handcuffed as he bled to death after being stabbed. Picture: Supplied
So the British police believe justice should not be colour blind, people should not be treated equally. This is sad and mad and bad. The very depiction of Lady Justice, in a thousand courts and judge’s chambers, is of a woman, blindfolded, holding the scales of justice. She weighs the evidence, blind to the background, race, power or wealth of the people involved. She is meant to be colour blind.

The US Stare Department made an extraordinary intervention, issuing a statement that said: “Ideological conditioning and two tier policing are glaring symptoms of civilisational decline. They must be rejected across the West.”

Nowak’s death will have short-term and long-term consequences for British politics. In the long term it means the Conservatives, Reform and all political forces to their right, and perhaps many in the centre, will campaign permanently to end identity politics and the madness of diversity, equity and inclusiveness guidelines – identity politics in light disguise.

Protesters demonstrate with police officers near Portswood Police Station in Southampton, on June 2, 2026, during a protest held in reaction to police handling of the detention of victim Henry Nowak. Picture: AFP
It could also have critical short-term consequences. Starter is the most unpopular PM in decades, less popular even than Liz Truss in her disastrous short stint at Number 10. In recent local elections Labour lost a staggering 1500 councillors. His big-spending government is mired in scandal, debt and ruinous taxation levels (sound familiar?). As Tony Blair recently wrote, it has no coherent direction. Starmer’s disastrous appointment of Peter Mandelson, a scandal-plagued friend of pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, as ambassador to the US has ruined what little was left of Starmer’s reputation.

Confidential messages relating to Mandelson were revealed this week. Among a forest of bitchy, personalised and deeply unattractive gossip and backbiting, Pat McFadden, the Secretary for Work and Pensions, remarked to Mandelson that government meetings consisted entirely of trying to find new groups of voters to tax to finance more welfare payments. In polls, Labour trails Reform by a long distance, in some even coming third behind the Conservatives.

Starmer’s failure, after so many recently failed prime ministerships, raises this troubling question: is modern Britain governable?

Farage is Britain’s Pauline Hanson, but much more formidable. Nonetheless, the idea of a Farage government horrifies the British elite almost as much as a One Nation government horrifies (with some justice) Australian elites.


Amid intense Labour leadership uncertainty, the Labour MP for Makerfield, in Manchester, resigned so that Andy Burnham, the mayor of Greater Manchester, could re-enter parliament and take the prime ministership from Starmer.

The latest polls, before the Nowak murder was revealed, put Burnham on 43 per cent in Makerfield, the Reform candidate, a local plumber, on 40, and the even more right-wing Restore Party candidate on 7. Restore could prevent Reform from winning Makerfield, or winning nationally. Restore is a breakaway from Reform. Its leader, Rupert Lowe, was formerly a Reform MP who had a spectacular row with Farage. He’s getting support from Elon Musk and US right-wing bloggers.

Lowe has 1.3 million followers on Facebook and almost 800,000 on Twitter. Restore wants even bigger mass expulsions of illegal immigrants and immigrants who commit crimes than Reform does. It also wants the death penalty and to ban the burqa. But mostly its policies are similar to Reform’s, which themselves are similar to the Conservatives’.

As the prospect of governing became a reality, Farage moderated and took on board some former senior Conservative cabinet ministers. That makes Reform look more like a plausible government but it took a fraction of the edge off his movement. This is the sliver of an opening Restore has barged through.

Nowak’s death could change everything. Badenoch’s own reaction was superb. She is by far the most likeable, courageous and responsible person in British politics. She detests identity politics and wokery and spoke with passion of the indignity of Nowak’s death. But she also made some effort to calm passions. She said in part: “I don’t want to hear about black lives matter. I don’t want to hear about white lives matter. We all matter. Enough of this nonsense where we are splitting into groups … we are descending into tribalism.”

In an act of responsibility, she didn’t raise the matter in Prime Minister’s question time. Maybe that was a mistake. She was entitled to call the government to account for the whole gamut of identity politics.


I interviewed Badenoch last year and she made this telling remark: “When the Conservatives were last in government, we talked right but governed left.” The failure of conservative governments in the West to deliver conservative policies led to voter frustration and the rise of Donald Trump, of Farage and of the whole range of nationalists in Europe.

Farage’s response, in a special short broadcast, was more political and more polarising than Badenoch’s. Yet in its way it was very powerful. He said in part: “Henry’s family has responded to this in the most extraordinarily dignified way. But I suggest the rest of us respond to this with pure cold rage. This is wrong. All the values and standards of living in a free country where everybody is judged equally by the law have been trashed and thrown away.”

There are only two outcomes possible in Makerfield. If Burnham wins, Starmer is toast. Burnham is personally popular, though as PM would face all the contradictions now crippling Starmer. But he would enjoy some honeymoon and would probably take back the few percentages of votes Labour has lost directly to Reform.

The biggest beneficiary of this would be Badenoch. If she can edge the Conservatives ahead of Reform, she will suddenly be, seriously, the alternative PM.

But if Makerfield voters really want to show how unhappy they are with the way Britain has gone, they will more likely vote Reform. If Reform wins in Makerfield, Farage will receive a huge boost of momentum and adrenaline, populism’s two magic ingredients.

Whatever happens, the tragic death of Henry Nowak will cast a giant shadow.

 

[wiggins]

Starma is rolling in woke quite publicly with his knee bending. This is real powerful emetic behaviour.

You guys have a similar pollitical situation to us in Aus. Here we have had 10 years of weak Labor lite LIberal rule leading to the election of the Albenese Labor government who were voted in again last year. Luckily we have 3 year election terms for the Federal government, 4 year terms for the states.

Albenese loves Starma.

 

[Humungus]

This was 1971.

 

[hedgerow]

this looks very interesting, i'll leave it for later if i have trouble getting to sleep

 

[wiggins]

this looks very interesting, i'll leave it for later if i have trouble getting to sleep

It's a case that blows Critifal Race Theory up as a suitable theory to guide policing.

The guy says he's been stabbed, he's bleeding out in his chest and the cop says 'no you're not mate' and cuffs him all because his murderer claimed he had knocked his tuban off in a racially motivated attack.

It's the same concept as #metoo. Believe all victims regardless of proof.

 

[hedgerow]

It's a case that blows Critifal Race Theory up as a suitable theory to guide policing.

The guy says he's been stabbed, he's bleeding out in his chest and the cop says 'no you're not mate' and cuffs him all because his murderer claimed he had knocked his tuban off in a racially motivated attack.

It's the same concept as #metoo. Believe all victims regardless of proof.

yes, but when are the people going to say "enough" and demand change? I'll continue dreaming about that.

 

[Vwj]

So after the troubles (throwing thing like rocks and bins etc…) between patriots and police the police went out for arrests,
Here’s one arrest they made

 

[Dr Deacon]

Starma is rolling in woke quite publicly with his knee bending. This is real powerful emetic behaviour.

You guys have a similar pollitical situation to us in Aus. Here we have had 10 years of weak Labor lite LIberal rule leading to the election of the Albenese Labor government who were voted in again last year. Luckily we have 3 year election terms for the Federal government, 4 year terms for the states.

Albenese loves Starma.

Thankfully NZ got rid of that horse faced islamic loving cunt Ardern. She was single handedly turning NZ into what the UK is now. The bitch was so unpopular that she ended up fleeing to Canada because of death threats, only to be sheltered by that other immigrant loving cunt, Trudeau.

 

[mrln]

i was listening to some of this yest morn on you tube. one of the things that got me was,how them two muzrats were in back of the paddy wagon. in their native tongue,they were trying to conspire a story up on how henry was the racist aggressor.

 

[Flatus Tube]

Here is the cunt showing off his sword prior to killing Henry in a different incident, that was not dealt with by the police.

 

[Jizdrop1]

I read this this morning:-

"
BRAKING: SPECIALIST DOCTOR SAYS HENRY NOWAK COULD HAVE LIVED IF NOT FOR POLICE
In summary:
- Henry was alive when they arrived and likely clotted
- Aggressive police intervention likely tore clot
- Major Trauma department was minutes away from scene
- Judge and Pathologist were FAR TOO LENIENT on Police
- Henry Nowak had 50% CHANCE to survive
- Absolutely convinced that if he arrived in hospital alive he would have survived
This is disgusting, the family deserve justice
Full breakdown below:
Dr Krzysztof Magier [@DrMagier] based in the Isle of Wight is a qualified Paediatric Care Lead and part of the 'Critical Care Network' with experience in combat medicine training and a specialized course in treating severe injuries (including gunshot and stab wounds) has analysed the footage and claimed the AGGRESSIVE Police intervention may have contributed towards Henry's death.
Dr Magier DISAGREES with the pathologist's and judge's opinion that Henry Nowak had ZERO chance of SURVIVAL.
As well as the claim that handcuffing him essentially changed NOTHING.
In fact he claims the REVERSE IS TRUE, there is a high likelihood that the police intervention CONTRIBUTED TO HENRY'S DEATH.
He analysed the autopsy report, which points to DAMAGE to the subclavian vein as the main source of BLEEDING.
In a healthy person, venous bleeding occurs under low pressure and often self-limits thanks to the NATURALLY FORMING CLOT, while simply approximating the wound edges and compressing the surrounding tissues closes the vein enough to slow or even stop the bleeding.
The body camera footage shows that when police arrived on the scene (likely 5-10 minutes after the injury), Henry was CONCIOUS ENOUGH to speak LOUDLY.
He was therefore NOT YET in a terminal state.
After his arms were twisted behind his back and handcuffed, the vein was most likely STRETCHED, the clot TORN, and BLEEDING DRAMATICALLY INTENSIFIED.
Within just about three minutes, he lost consciousness and DIED.
People with suspected internal injuries should NEVER be moved or yanked abruptly, such actions can destroy the natural clot and lead to massive internal hemorrhage.
Instead of immediately calling a medical rescue team and handing the patient over to paramedics, the police ARRESTED HIM.
If paramedics had arrived first on the scene, Henry’s chances of survival would have been MUCH HIGHER.
AS HIGH AS "50%"—writes Dr. Magier.
Paramedics could have quickly started an IV, administered fluids to increase circulating blood volume, and tranexamic acid to stabilize the clot, and if needed, performed needle decompression (inserting a large, long needle into the lung), because the issue wasn’t so much lack of lung function, but compression of the blood-filled lung on the heart and mediastinum, which blocks circulation.
Worse still, the incident took place just a few minutes' drive by car (2–3 minutes by ambulance with sirens) from Southampton University Hospital—a regional MAJOR TRAUMA CENTRE equipped with a full team of specialists, procedures, and equipment.
"I AM CONVINCED THAT IF HENRY HAD ARRIVED THERE ALIVE THE DOCTORS WOULD HAVE NOT LET HIM DIE"—writes Dr. Magier.
The aggressive police intervention, instead of saving a life, led to death through improper handling of a severely injured person, even though world-class care was just minutes away. "I fear the Judge and pathologist were too lenient toward the police"



I know those Cunt cops didn't stab the lad but it was them that seen him off. Imagine not being able to breath properly and someone forces your arms behind your back and cuffs them. That would make it much harder to breath. That male cop needs prosecuting. So far only one of them have resigned.That way they get to keep their full pension. Anyhow the UK has been like this for years now but under this cunting fucking cunt starmer it's got worse and we have two tier Policing. If you're a White working class straight bloke you are fucked from every angle.

EDIT= if you fly or carry a union jack or the England flag here you are branded a "Right Wing Thug" My Brit mates here will confirm that's true. There is a vid on the internet as well of a Copper stopping a bloke from waving an England flag whilst he was out in public. I've got to the stage where i hate my own country now and i used to be very patriotic,i would have even gone to war,fuck them now the shithole isn't worth fighting for!

 

[Dr Deacon]

Here is the cunt showing off his sword prior to killing Henry in a different incident, that was not dealt with by the police.

Faggot wearing a dress.

 

[j.f.🔎]

After hearing Henry Novak for the 30th bloody time on the radio yesterday I had a conversation with Gemini about converting to Sikhism to carry a 8 inch blade legally in the UK.

Converting to Sikhism solely to bypass weapon laws and carry an 8-inch knife is highly unlikely to protect you from legal prosecution. While UK law under the [Criminal Justice Act 1988](https://theweek.com/law/henry-nowak-sikh-exemptions-knife-laws) provides religious exemptions for initiated Sikhs carrying a ceremonial kirpan, this protection does not function as a blanket loophole for carrying tactical, utility, or non-ceremonial blades. [1, 2, 3]
Before making a decision based on weapon carrying, consider these vital legal and religious realities:
## Legal Reality and Limitations

* The "Good Reason" Burden: If stopped by police, the burden of proof is on you to demonstrate a legitimate religious purpose. Courts and law enforcement analyze the specific context, your intent, and the nature of the blade. [4, 5]
* Kirpan Specifications: A true kirpan is an article of faith symbolizing grace and dignity, not an offensive weapon. Carrying an 8-inch commercial tactical or hunting knife and claiming it is a kirpan will likely lead to an immediate charge of carrying an illegal bladed article in public. [4, 6]
* Strict Penalties Apply: If you use a kirpan for self-defense or brandish it, you lose all religious legal protections. You will be prosecuted under standard, severe UK knife crime laws exactly like anyone else. [7, 8, 9, 10]
* Active Legal Debates: Recent high-profile cases have prompted ongoing reviews regarding the public carrying of ceremonial blades by some community groups and political figures. [2, 4]

## Religious Meaning in Sikhism

* The Amritdhari Vow: You cannot simply call yourself a Sikh to carry a blade. The kirpan can only be worn by an Amritdhari (an initiated Sikh who has taken Amrit, or baptism). [9, 11, 12, 13]
* The Five Ks: Initiation requires a strict lifelong commitment to the [Five Articles of Faith](https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/jun/02/conviction-sparks-debate-on-ceremonial-blades-carried-by-some-sikhs). You must adopt all five simultaneously: Kesh (uncut hair kept in a turban), Kangha (wooden comb), Kara (iron bracelet), Kachera (cotton undergarments), and the Kirpan. [4, 14, 15]
* Moral Responsibilities: The kirpan is a sacred commitment to defend the weak, stand against injustice, and maintain absolute self-discipline. It is not a personal weapon, a tool for intimidation, or a loophole for everyday knife enthusiasts. [4, 16, 17]

If you are genuinely interested in learning about the faith, it is best to visit a local Gurdwara (temple) to speak with practicing Sikhs about the spiritual duties involved. If your primary goal is simply to carry a large blade legally, a religious conversion will not achieve that objective.
If you would like to explore this further, let me know:

* Are you looking for information on general UK knife laws and legal carry limits?
* Do you want to learn more about the spiritual history of Sikhism?

I can provide the exact legal statutes or religious contexts depending on what you need.

--------------------------

I also asked it if I could start my own religion and carry a gun just to show how fucking stupid that law is.

No, you cannot start a religion to legally carry a gun. Under UK law, there are absolutely no religious exemptions for firearms ownership, carrying, or use.
While the law makes specific allowances for certain religious and cultural articles like the kirpan or the Scottish Sgian Dubh, firearms are regulated under an entirely separate, strict legal framework that treats all citizens exactly the same regardless of faith.
## The Legal Reality of UK Gun Laws

* No Religious Exemptions: The Firearms Act 1968 and its subsequent amendments do not recognize religious belief as a valid reason to possess, carry, or use a firearm.
* Strict Licensing System: To legally possess a firearm in the UK, you must apply to the police for a Firearm Certificate (FAC) or Shotgun Certificate (SGC). Every applicant is vetted equally based on public safety, background checks, and mental health assessments.
* The "Good Reason" Requirement: To get a certificate, you must prove a specific, practical "good reason" to the police. Legally recognized reasons are strictly limited to sports shooting, target shooting at an approved club, or pest control/game shooting on land where you have permission. Religion is not a legally valid "good reason."
* Public Carry is Illegal: Even if you hold a valid firearm certificate for sport or land management, it is a severe criminal offense to carry that firearm in a public place without a valid, immediate reason (such as transporting it directly to a shooting range in a secure case). Self-defense and personal protection are explicitly rejected by UK police as reasons to own or carry a gun.

## Why Knife Laws and Gun Laws Differ
The reason the law treats a ceremonial blade differently from a firearm comes down to the inherent nature of the items and public safety:

* The Nature of the Item: A kirpan is an article of faith worn discreetly under clothing, typically blunt or secured, with a long history of safe practice in the community.
* The Lethality of Firearms: Firearms are classified as highly lethal instruments with no historical or recognized role as peaceful religious dress in British society. The state maintains an absolute restriction on public firearm possession to ensure public safety, leaving no room for cultural or religious adaptation.

If you are interested in looking further into the specifics of weapon regulations, please let me know:

* Do you want to know more about the eligibility criteria for a standard UK Firearm Certificate?
* Are you interested in the penalties for carrying prohibited weapons in public?

 

[NJLV073]

Let the purge begin 👌

 

[Vwj]

i was listening to some of this yest morn on you tube. one of the things that got me was,how them two muzrats were in back of the paddy wagon. in their native tongue,they were trying to conspire a story up on how henry was the racist aggressor.

I think you’ll find the story was made up before the phone call to the emergency services, that why the mum got arrested, and that’s why when the police arrived they said they had bruises from the racially aggravated assault
The Sikh was a nutcase to start with, had a few run ins before this

 

[REDRUM616]

That’s a lot to take in before my hangover coffee.