Thought see was gonna taste it for a sec there...
-
Adults Only Website 18+
If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.
We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.
We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.
Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.
We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.
By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.
Crime Pervert Doing His Thang
- Thread starter Monkman777
- Start date
Crime
Of course it’s a monkey.
God that is funny. You couldn’t pay to do that though. I’ll do crazy ass shit but not that. I mean I use to burn cop cars, to oiling the entire Walmart floors where you couldn’t walk. I was a crazy ass teenager. lol now I’m an old married man with kids lol. Going to teach my kids everything I know.
Murderer!
Victim blaming. Girl did nothing wrong.
Here's the thing: that. guy. should. not. have. been. there. doing. what. he. did.
Last edited:
Clendenon
Forum Veteran
Not victim blaming, just self preservation advice.
i dont think its victim blaming. because people usually feel a presence of someone, when theyre aware of their surroundings. you know when someone usually creeps up on you,or enters your "zone" right? same thing.
dont know if this is a muzzrat,but is it safe to assume so? they dont seem to have self control or restraint while out in public anyway.
It's victim blaming because SHE (who is not provoking or anything) is called out, thus laying the responsibility of the guy's harmful action with her.
(Yes, people usually sense something when someone creeps up on them, but you can't blame a person for being off-guard, anyone can be distracted, which is why pickpockets still exist.)
He was quick to cum and go
im not saying its her fault for his perversion
You were not, but someone else was; laying the "responsibility" for his action with her.
He must have had a ton of practice....
I don't believe that @Clendenon was blaming the victim. Some people don't understand that there is more than either simply blaming the victim or the perpetrator. It's possible for a victim to take some control of the situation. Check out this Google link and perhaps some of the web pages on it, if you'd like. You should find some of these interesting.
Google Search
What the fuck is wrong with you
nimblefingers
Two in the pink, one in the stink!
I have a little more to say about this. I agreed with everything you wrote here except for the first 2 words. Actually, I also disagree with your excessive use of periods.
I gave you a link to some of what Bruno Bettelheim had to say. I'm not going to read those pages now, but I will tell you a little bit about what I remember from my days at my university days. Bettelheim was a prisoner in a WWII German concentration camp and develop frostbite on his hands. When he tried to have the dead tissue removed, a cocky prison guard pulled out his pocket knife and told Bettelheim that he could remove it for him without Bettelheim having to enter the infirmary. Bettelheim presented his hands and thanked the guard. The guard was freaked out and allowed Bettelheim to enter for the treatment that he needed.
Bettelheim wrote that although he was absolutely the victim in this case, he still managed to take some control of the situation.
The moral of the story is that it's better to dodge the load rather than stand there and get jizzed on.
I know all about Bruno Bettelheim.
It's victim blaming as soon as you hear/read this: "she should have" or "should have not", again: that is shifting the focus from the perpetrator to the object of his harmful action, commonly called "victim". Then my answer is; NO, there was NOTHING for her either to do or not to do. The responsibility in this case lay with the wanker.
EDIT after reading your above example. Mislaid example of a totally different occurrence in a totally different situation.
In the OP the victim was a woman with her back to the street. It is absurd to suggest that she "should" have turned around etc. This is an unrealistic suggestion, assuming that you might expect a standard type of behaviour from people in certain situations. You cannot.
I could ask anyone: have you ever had it that something crept up on you and you were unaware? And the answer will probably be yes. It is something we all know. And we are not to be blamed for that. BUT... that person who then takes advantage of our lack of alertness deserves the blame, if it concerned a harmful action.
Last edited:
I learned about Bruno Bettelheim in an honors class at my university. The professor and all the other students in the class were all female, and I was the only male. The professor, obviously an intelligent woman, could not see Bettelheim's point.
Just because a person doesn't take the best action does not mean that they are in any way responsible for someone else's behavior. "She should have" or "should have not" could be used to assign blame, but could also be used to point out what might have been a better way to deal with a situation. There are often many different ways to deal with any given situation. We do our best to make the right decision, but even if we don't, that doesn't mean that we are to blame for what someone else has done to us.
On a personal note, I am constantly analyzing how I have handle different situations in my life. I usually feel like I could have done better, but that does not mean that I'm to blame for something that someone else did.
As a woman with a strange man coming up behind her, I can only guess that it would be frightening and she didn't know what to do. Was there any legitimate reason why he would be standing there? I have no idea. People do like to blame victims - are you familiar with Just World Orientation? That doesn't necessarily mean that every observation about what the victim could have done better to protect themselves is the same as assigning blame.
Familiar with the term "Just world fallacy", where it is assumed that only people who make mistakes will have bad things befall them..
I believe you are over analyzing the situation in the OP and bringing in arguments that confuse the one and only issue here:
man stands behind unsuspecting woman, wanks and drops the load on her person. To then say "she should have sensed him and taken control" is completely absurd and unfair.
It is really very simple: suggesting someone who is a target or a victim of a harmful action "should" have done something to prevent the abuse is shifting the focus from the guilty party to the innocent party where the former is partially (or even entirely) exonerated which then adds insult to injury for the target/victim.
But this simple reasoning is unpopular for some people.
Anyone can talk till they are blue in the face but I stand by my original, and oft repeated assessment of the situation in the OP.
EDIT : extra example for a better understanding. Mr. Cunning L. wants to pay at the checkout in the supermarket, he reaches for his wallet in his pocket.... it's not there.... it's been stolen. By a pickpocket. He is very angry and upset, and speaks up, some guy behind him in the row says: "Well, your own fault sir, you should have been more aware..."
Last edited:
