• Adults Only Website 18+

    If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.

    We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.

    We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.

    Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.

    We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.

    By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.

Stabilized and enhanced version of the famous Patterson Bigfoot footage

When I first saw this, in all its grainy glory, at like 10 years old. I thought to myself, 'That is obviously a man in an ape suit." Now, over 40 years later? "That is very obviously a man in an ape suit."
I posit the aforementioned theory is insubstantial due to a fatal flaw in tha analysis of the subject in this video. At no time has the gender of the supposed Sasquatch been considered. This very well could be a very ugly Sasquatch bitch. Furthermore, it hasn't been considered the Sasquatch could be transgender, thus requiring an entirely new dataset for comparative analysis.

TLDR; How dare you assume the 'Squatch's gender?!?
 
Back
Top