• Adults Only Website 18+

    If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.

    We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.

    We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.

    Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.

    We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.

    By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.

UK Activists dye US embassy pond Blood Red

IMG_1640.webp
 
Ironically it was the UK who owned The British Mandate of Palestine and they fumbled the ball when they just up and abandoned it - along with 90% of their empire post WWII because they went broke fighting the Germans.
Well... empires are bad, aren't they. We learned it in the 1950s. Russia learned it in the 1990s. The real question is.... when will the USA learn it, and at what cost?
 
Ironically it was the UK who owned The British Mandate of Palestine and they fumbled the ball when they just up and abandoned it - along with 90% of their empire post WWII because they went broke fighting the Germans.
WWII was just the continuation of WWI as the Brits backed out of the deal with world jewelry/Zionists for the financing their war against Germany (balfor declaration). The Brits promised Palestine to the Jews then backed out after the Jews turned on Germany and backed the British war against Germany. The chosen ones have been behind the majority of wars in Europe even the civil war in the states, the Rothschild brothers financed both sides (north and south) taking in the profits as white men slaughtered each other.
 
"Let my people go, Yul Brynner, you Russian Buryat!" - almost Charlton Heston as Moses in The Ten Commandments (1956)
:lulz:

 
So the Boston tea party members were gay?

Ok.
Essentially, yes. The protest was not as wholly supported as you might think.

In June of 1774, George Washington wrote: “the cause of Boston…ever will be considered as the cause of America.” But his personal views of the event were far different. He voiced strong disapproval of “their conduct in destroying the Tea” and claimed Bostonians “were mad.” Washington, like many other elites, held private property to be sacrosanct.
Benjamin Franklin insisted the British East India Company be reimbursed for the lost tea and even offered to pay for it himself.
 
Essentially, yes. The protest was not as wholly supported as you might think.

In June of 1774, George Washington wrote: “the cause of Boston…ever will be considered as the cause of America.” But his personal views of the event were far different. He voiced strong disapproval of “their conduct in destroying the Tea” and claimed Bostonians “were mad.” Washington, like many other elites, held private property to be sacrosanct.
Benjamin Franklin insisted the British East India Company be reimbursed for the lost tea and even offered to pay for it himself.
Wasn’t supported fully, yet it’s marked as an important date in history books.

Try to massage shit as much as you want, still lead to more activism, and ultimately lead to the revolution.
 
Wasn’t supported fully, yet it’s marked as an important date in history books.

Try to massage shit as much as you want, still lead to more activism, and ultimately lead to the revolution.
It was a quote from a site to portray that not everyone was on board with it. Notice I left the part that Washington wrote the event was a backbone of the United States revolution. How is that massaging anything, you dumb fuck?

Always look for a conspiracy and you’ll find one.
 
Back
Top