• Adults Only Website 18+

    If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.

    We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.

    We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.

    Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.

    We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.

    By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.

Well Imagine That 🙄

The performance artist who controversially allowed spectators to do whatever they wanted to her body for six hours has revealed the moment the stunt went horribly wrong.

In 1974, Serbian conceptual artist Marina Abramović decided to take on the most risky performance of her career. Named 'Rhythm 0,' the artist stood completely still for six hours while visitors were allowed to use a series of objects on her in whatever way they wished.

Aiming to see how far the public would go when given complete control over another human's body, Abramović left 72 different objects out for spectators to use.

These included a a rose, feather, perfume, honey, bread, grapes, wine, scissors, a scalpel, nails, a metal bar, a gun, and a bullet.

The performance started relatively tame (Marina Abramović Institute/YouTube)
Unsurprisingly, it didn't take long for the experiment to go south, but where did it all go wrong?

Initially, the stunt remained pretty tame, with visitors offering her a rose of simply watching as she stood still.

The performance started relatively tame (Marina Abramović Institute/YouTube)

The performance started relatively tame (Marina Abramović Institute/YouTube)
Unsurprisingly, it didn't take long for the experiment to go south, but where did it all go wrong?

Initially, the stunt remained pretty tame, with visitors offering her a rose of simply watching as she stood still.



However, this would later take a very dark turn.

"At the beginning, nothing really happened," Abramović, now 77, would later say of the stunt during an interview on the Marina Abramovic Institute YouTube channel.

"The public were really nice. They gave me a rose, they would kiss me, look at me, and the public became more and more wild."

Emboldened by the fact that Abramović had placed her fate entirely in the hands of those around her, spectators became violent in their actions. The artist's clothes were slashed away by razor blades and one person would even cut her throat in order to suck blood from her neck.

The artist would later reveal that she believed the turning point was when the audience realised they could get away with doing whatever they wished to her body.

Towards the end of the performance, the audience had split into two camps - those who wanted to protect Abramović and those who wanted to do her harm. A fight would break out in the room after a loaded gun was pointed to her head. It's unclear whether or not this ended the experiment or the six hours had simply elapsed.

Either way, Abramović had revealed some harrowing truths about what humans are prepared to do to others when faced with no repercussions.

What I learned was that ... if you leave it up to the audience, they can kill you," she said.

"I felt really violated: they cut up my clothes, stuck rose thorns in my stomach, one person aimed the gun at my head, and another took it away."

Abramović went on to add that several spectators would even run away after the performance ended, unable to face the woman they had treated so horribly.

Everybody ran away. People could not actually confront with me as a person."

The performance would go on cement Abramović as one of the most important conceptual artists around at the time, but also demonstrate the cruel nature of the human mind.

 
I think it's more of a reflection of the morals of the people in the time and place that she performed the stumt rather than a reflection of humanity as a whole. Do this stunt in Amish country and nobody would even lay a finger on you. Do this in the South Bronx and you will be gang raped and murdered. Humanity varies in its morals, the question is how much nature has to do with vs. how much nurture has to do with it. Is the human born good or does it have to be taught to be good? Is the human born evil or does it have to be taught to be evil? These are the fundamental questions.
 
"We're barely out of the jungle folks." - George Carlin

In other news, corporations have stopped doing their "trust" workshop drills where one person would fall backwards and be caught by others after a few dozen too many cracked skulls and enduring all of the liabilities, medical bills and physical therapies that resulted from failures to catch them.

:lulz:
 
The performance artist who controversially allowed spectators to do whatever they wanted to her body for six hours has revealed the moment the stunt went horribly wrong.

In 1974, Serbian conceptual artist Marina Abramović decided to take on the most risky performance of her career. Named 'Rhythm 0,' the artist stood completely still for six hours while visitors were allowed to use a series of objects on her in whatever way they wished.

Aiming to see how far the public would go when given complete control over another human's body, Abramović left 72 different objects out for spectators to use.

These included a a rose, feather, perfume, honey, bread, grapes, wine, scissors, a scalpel, nails, a metal bar, a gun, and a bullet.

The performance started relatively tame (Marina Abramović Institute/YouTube)
Unsurprisingly, it didn't take long for the experiment to go south, but where did it all go wrong?

Initially, the stunt remained pretty tame, with visitors offering her a rose of simply watching as she stood still.

The performance started relatively tame (Marina Abramović Institute/YouTube)

The performance started relatively tame (Marina Abramović Institute/YouTube)
Unsurprisingly, it didn't take long for the experiment to go south, but where did it all go wrong?

Initially, the stunt remained pretty tame, with visitors offering her a rose of simply watching as she stood still.



However, this would later take a very dark turn.

"At the beginning, nothing really happened," Abramović, now 77, would later say of the stunt during an interview on the Marina Abramovic Institute YouTube channel.

"The public were really nice. They gave me a rose, they would kiss me, look at me, and the public became more and more wild."

Emboldened by the fact that Abramović had placed her fate entirely in the hands of those around her, spectators became violent in their actions. The artist's clothes were slashed away by razor blades and one person would even cut her throat in order to suck blood from her neck.

The artist would later reveal that she believed the turning point was when the audience realised they could get away with doing whatever they wished to her body.

Towards the end of the performance, the audience had split into two camps - those who wanted to protect Abramović and those who wanted to do her harm. A fight would break out in the room after a loaded gun was pointed to her head. It's unclear whether or not this ended the experiment or the six hours had simply elapsed.

Either way, Abramović had revealed some harrowing truths about what humans are prepared to do to others when faced with no repercussions.

What I learned was that ... if you leave it up to the audience, they can kill you," she said.

"I felt really violated: they cut up my clothes, stuck rose thorns in my stomach, one person aimed the gun at my head, and another took it away."

Abramović went on to add that several spectators would even run away after the performance ended, unable to face the woman they had treated so horribly.

Everybody ran away. People could not actually confront with me as a person."

The performance would go on cement Abramović as one of the most important conceptual artists around at the time, but also demonstrate the cruel nature of the human mind.

Ya,well there's 1 instrument that wasn't on that table or used!!! MY DICK!!!
🤣🤣🤣...SP
 
The performance artist who controversially allowed spectators to do whatever they wanted to her body for six hours has revealed the moment the stunt went horribly wrong.

In 1974, Serbian conceptual artist Marina Abramović decided to take on the most risky performance of her career. Named 'Rhythm 0,' the artist stood completely still for six hours while visitors were allowed to use a series of objects on her in whatever way they wished.

Aiming to see how far the public would go when given complete control over another human's body, Abramović left 72 different objects out for spectators to use.

These included a a rose, feather, perfume, honey, bread, grapes, wine, scissors, a scalpel, nails, a metal bar, a gun, and a bullet.

The performance started relatively tame (Marina Abramović Institute/YouTube)
Unsurprisingly, it didn't take long for the experiment to go south, but where did it all go wrong?

Initially, the stunt remained pretty tame, with visitors offering her a rose of simply watching as she stood still.

The performance started relatively tame (Marina Abramović Institute/YouTube)

The performance started relatively tame (Marina Abramović Institute/YouTube)
Unsurprisingly, it didn't take long for the experiment to go south, but where did it all go wrong?

Initially, the stunt remained pretty tame, with visitors offering her a rose of simply watching as she stood still.



However, this would later take a very dark turn.

"At the beginning, nothing really happened," Abramović, now 77, would later say of the stunt during an interview on the Marina Abramovic Institute YouTube channel.

"The public were really nice. They gave me a rose, they would kiss me, look at me, and the public became more and more wild."

Emboldened by the fact that Abramović had placed her fate entirely in the hands of those around her, spectators became violent in their actions. The artist's clothes were slashed away by razor blades and one person would even cut her throat in order to suck blood from her neck.

The artist would later reveal that she believed the turning point was when the audience realised they could get away with doing whatever they wished to her body.

Towards the end of the performance, the audience had split into two camps - those who wanted to protect Abramović and those who wanted to do her harm. A fight would break out in the room after a loaded gun was pointed to her head. It's unclear whether or not this ended the experiment or the six hours had simply elapsed.

Either way, Abramović had revealed some harrowing truths about what humans are prepared to do to others when faced with no repercussions.

What I learned was that ... if you leave it up to the audience, they can kill you," she said.

"I felt really violated: they cut up my clothes, stuck rose thorns in my stomach, one person aimed the gun at my head, and another took it away."

Abramović went on to add that several spectators would even run away after the performance ended, unable to face the woman they had treated so horribly.

Everybody ran away. People could not actually confront with me as a person."

The performance would go on cement Abramović as one of the most important conceptual artists around at the time, but also demonstrate the cruel nature of the human mind.

Wow, what a truly demonic woman this is! She is 100% a true witch!
 
She's awesome. I almost never like performance art, but she and her partner, and then she alone, produced some very interesting and thoughtful pieces.

Here's another one:

For context, this is at a show where she had one minute of silence with anyone who wanted to sit across from her. The gentleman in this clip is her former artistic and romantic partner, whom she hadn't seen in many years and had no idea would be there.
 
Diffusion of responsibility. They did studies like this with electric shocks as well. An authority figure telling someone off the street to shock another stranger behind a screen everytime they got an answer to a question wrong and up the voltage everytime. I believe roughly 40% of people were willing to give a fatal shock just because the experimenter told them that they were not responsible for what happens. (They we’re also told at the beginning that the man being shocked had a heart condition and could hear him scream everytime he was shocked yet continued to shock him)

The Stanford Prison Experiment is also something worth looking up. Although it’s more psychology oriented..

On another note. That artist should have known better. She’s a fucking retard..


Nonetheless interesting read OP. I hadn’t heard of this one until now.
 
I wouldn't be surprised if the entire thing was staged with certain people in the audience instructed to do those things by herself. She wouldn't have gotten her point across if nothing shocking happened during the event. Never underestimate what a person will do to gain attention.
 
This was after WW 2 and the Milgram Experiments, you'd think they had realised what people are capable off when there's no direct threat of consequences...
 
Back
Top