• Adults Only Website 18+

    If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.

    We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.

    We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.

    Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.

    We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.

    By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.

EYE WIDE SHUT

If it was apocalypse now I'd watch it but eyes wide shut is just a terrible fucking movie that bored the shit out of me until I changed the channel. Kubrick really jumped the shark making that crap.
I watched it in the theater with a miserable twat of a GF. I don't particularly like Nicole Kidman and I hate Tom Cruise with the force of a thousand suns. I've never bothered to even attempt to watch it again.
 
If it was apocalypse now I'd watch it but eyes wide shut is just a terrible fucking movie that bored the shit out of me until I changed the channel. Kubrick really jumped the shark making that crap.

there's more to this than meets the eye​

 
It was a dogshit movie, not going to watch an hours worth of some film student dissecting and analyzing it.
I agree. I fuckin' hate film analysis. Utter masturbatory shit!

I watched it in the theater with a miserable twat of a GF. I don't particularly like Nicole Kidman and I hate Tom Cruise with the force of a thousand suns. I've never bothered to even attempt to watch it again.
I saw it in the theatre as well (many moons ago). Wasn't with a twat of a girlfriend, though. Despite not liking Nicole Kidman much, and praying nightly for Tom Cruise's much deserved and violent death, I like the film.
 
I watched it in the theater with a miserable twat of a GF. I don't particularly like Nicole Kidman and I hate Tom Cruise with the force of a thousand suns. I've never bothered to even attempt to watch it again.
It's like a French art students film, and I don't enjoy that kind of shit at all. Kubrick went from The Shining - which is still a great film - to les miserables with an American midget.

Also I should have said full metal jacket - both it and apocalypse are high on my watch list.
 
I watched it in the theater with a miserable twat of a GF. I don't particularly like Nicole Kidman and I hate Tom Cruise with the force of a thousand suns. I've never bothered to even attempt to watch it again.
your eyes are wide shut with prejudices unable to stand what you dislike is a weak and poor choice of life.
 
It's like a French art students film, and I don't enjoy that kind of shit at all. Kubrick went from The Shining - which is still a great film - to les miserables with an American midget.

Also I should have said full metal jacket - both it and apocalypse are high on my watch list.
midgets are okay, insects are okay
istockphoto-1200817449-612x612.webp
 
intellectual masturbatory! what the hell is that?
Intellectual masturbation aka Mental Masturbation. Perhaps I should have used the term "ego-stroking". In my experience with film criticism/analysis, authors pick and choose elements of film(s) as points of departure to speculate wildly about their supposed meanings; usually in a intellectually self-serving(i.e., masturbatory) manner. Take a gander at the film Room 213 (also about Kubrick), and you'll see what I mean: a bunch of fools making laughably tenuous arguments about the meaning of The Shining by picking and choosing disparate elements of the film to expound on. What none of these knuckleheads understand about art and creativity is that no artist creates anything with explicit/literal ideas in mind about what the finished product will represent (e.g. "and this represents the genocide of the American Indian in the West"); only juveniles and bad artists think about creativity in such literal terms. If art was mean to be interpreted literally there would be no use for it; that's what books are for.
 
Back
Top