• Adults Only Website 18+

    If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.

    We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.

    We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.

    Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.

    We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.

    By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.

War Defense secretary abruptly revokes plea deal with alleged 9/11 mastermind KSM

BTW this I one thing I really hate about the Bush administration is his torture tactics used in fear, makes this a legal clusterfuck as we are seeing. But anyway you aren’t here for my opinion you are here for the story…

Full article:

CNN —

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin abruptly revoked a plea deal for the alleged mastermind of the September 11, 2001, terror attacks and his co-conspirators, and he relieved the overseer in charge after years of effort to reach an agreement to bring the cases to a close.

In a surprise memo quietly released Friday night, Austin said the responsibility for such a significant decision “should rest with me.” Only two days earlier, the Pentagon announced that it had reached a plea deal with Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, more commonly known as KSM, and two other defendants – Walid Bin ‘Attash, and Hawsawi – accused of plotting the attacks.

The memo, addressed to Susan Escallier, the convening authority for military commissions who runs the military courts at Guantanamo Bay, said the defense secretary would immediately withdraw her authority in the cases and “reserve such authority to (himself).”

Austin said that he was withdrawing from the three pre-trial agreements, which had taken the death penalty off the table for the three men.

Prosecutors in the case had been discussing the possibility of a plea deal for more than two years, which would have avoided a lengthy trial complicated by questions over the admissibility of evidence obtained during torture.

After beginning negotiations in March 2022, the pre-trial agreement announced Wednesday would have seen KSM and his co-defendants sentenced to prison in exchange for pleading guilty to all charges, including conspiracy and the murder of the 2,976 people listed in the charging sheet.

In 2008, Mohammed was charged with a list of crimes including conspiracy, murder in violation of the law of war, attacking civilians, attacking civilian objects, intentionally causing serious bodily injury, destruction of property in violation of the law of war, and terrorism and material support of terrorism. The US had said it would seek the death penalty for Mohammed.

But the military trial against Mohammed and his alleged co-conspirators was delayed for years as the US tried to determine how to handle the issue of torture used against Mohammed and others at secret CIA prisons in the 2000s. The trial was set to begin on January 11, 2021, but delays brought about by the resignation of two judges and the coronavirus pandemic pushed the date back.

The plea deal announcement prompted a fierce backlash, including from both sides of the political aisle and some groups representing 9/11 victims who have pushed for the US government to pursue the death penalty for the worst attacks on US soil since Pearl Harbor.

“While we acknowledge the decision to avoid the death penalty, our primary concern remains access to these individuals for information,” said Brett Eagleson, the president of 9/11 Justice, an organization that represents 9/11 survivors and family members of victims, in a statement following the initial announcement. “These plea deals should not perpetuate a system of closed-door agreements, where crucial information is hidden without giving the families of the victims the chance to learn the full truth.”

Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, who has represented families of 9/11 victims, told CNN Thursday he had concerns about the plea deal and said the administration owed Americans an explanation for the agreement.

“I think there are interests here that may not have been represented as fairly and aggressively as they should have been,” he said, adding, “When we fight terrorists, and we have them in custody, we need to hold them accountable with the kinds of penalties that really do justice to the victims.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican, warned that the plea deal “sends a horribly bad signal at a very dangerous time.”

“The world is on fire, terrorism is rampant, and we give a plea deal to the mastermind of 9/11? That just encourages more attacks,” he said.

The US government’s efforts to bring the 9/11 defendants and others held at the Guantanamo prison to justice has been marred by legal and political obstacles spanning administrations since George W. Bush.

In 2009, then Attorney General Eric Holder announced plans to charge the men in US criminal court in Manhattan, prompting backlash from some lower Manhattan residents and Republicans who insisted military tribunals were more appropriate. The transfer was part of President Barack Obama’s goal of closing the Guantanamo prison, a campaign promise.

Republicans passed laws blocking the prison closure and Holder dropped plans for a trial. US criminal courts for decades have dealt with high profile terror trials, including with death sentences, which Holder had authorized. But political opposition relegated the case to the Guantanamo tribunals, mired in delays.

Holder reminded critics on Friday that his 2009 plan would likely have resolved the case long ago.

“The people responsible for structuring this awful deal did the best they could,” Holder said on X, invoking Daniel Pearl, the Wall Street Journal reporter killed by terrorists in Pakistan. “They were dealt a bad hand by political hacks and ideologues who lost faith in our justice system. KSM would be just a memory if my 2009 decision had been followed. #DannyPearl.”





Link: https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/02/politics/plea-deal-9-11-khalid-sheikh-mohammed-revoked-austin/index.html
 
Fuck terrorists.
Fuck Islamo-fascists or Islamic Jihadists and those who sympathize with their goals.

Yeh well fuck those sub human islamic pieces of shit, and fuck you @Eric Blair for being a cuck of the muzrat and the disgusting nigger.
I am a cuck of the muzrats who are pro-democracy and pro-individual rights and pro-free expression which are quite a bit. There is a long struggle for these things in especially the Arab Muslim world, but of course the Persian people are being held and treated as property of a filthy Islamic theocracy. I know you don’t care cuz they are all sand niggers to you but how about you stop being a tribal piece of shit and stand with the people in the world who want to live a most Western way a life, a life I’m sure you love slimy Nazi eel!
 
Last edited:
but how about you stop being a tribal piece of shit and stand with the people in the world who want to live a most Western way a life, a life I’m sure you love slimy Nazi eel!
Only niggers and shitskins are "tribal".
How about the muzrats and other 3rd world migrant detritus who infest the UK and who want to come to the UK actually integrate with the BRITISH way of life instead? Instead of trying to impose their stone age sharia and filthy habits wherever they go....nah, like I said - fuck muslims and fuck you.
 
Only niggers and shitskins are "tribal".
How about the muzrats and other 3rd world migrant detritus who infest the UK and who want to come to the UK actually integrate with the BRITISH way of life instead? Instead of trying to impose their stone age sharia and filthy habits wherever they go....nah, like I said - fuck muslims and fuck you.
No you are tribal, you are a race tribalist, a white one. You don’t care about helping anyone but white people in the UK.
 
American Jews were behind 9/11 it could have all happened the way it did without security on the Pentagon being basically switched off.. 2 fighter jets were scrambled 160 out to sea when they could have reached the Pentagon in around 7 minutes.. that's not a minor slip up. And add to that the WTC had taken out insurance ( with Bush's son 8n charge of the insurance company that sub-let the policies out to smaller companies, insuring that his own company never had to pay out a single penny )
 
American Jews were behind 9/11 it could have all happened the way it did without security on the Pentagon being basically switched off.. 2 fighter jets were scrambled 160 out to sea when they could have reached the Pentagon in around 7 minutes.. that's not a minor slip up. And add to that the WTC had taken out insurance ( with Bush's son 8n charge of the insurance company that sub-let the policies out to smaller companies, insuring that his own company never had to pay out a single penny )
🤔 :phand::lolhard:
 
And rightly so. Why should I care about a bunch of shitskins who want to invade my country? They're sub humans and should be minced into fertiliser.
Wait so Indians who countries and kingdoms you guys invaded and colonized, their ancestors who moved to UK for whatever reason. You’re done with them, you would ship them out, or only Muslims.

What relevant information could they possibly have at this point? They’ve been locked up for almost 20 yrs, all their intel has expired.

Just leave them in a cell to rot or kill them and be done with it.
It’s not about that, it’s about the fact they were waterboarding and it’s not admissible in court. That’s one reason, a legalistic and pragmatic reason why it was a huge mistake and in fact criminal to be doing that to them and there is nothing I hate more than Islamo-fascism. During WW2 with a lot more lives at state we didn’t waterboard Nazi officers or higher ups as policy.
 
Wait so Indians who countries and kingdoms you guys invaded and colonized, their ancestors who moved to UK for whatever reason. You’re done with them, you would ship them out, or only Muslims.
British Indians are generally hard workers and integrated very well into the British way of life adopting values and traditions of the UK.
Muzrats on the other hand refuse to integrate and demand their own stone age laws and rules; they're the scum of the earth in whatever country they infest.
 
British Indians are generally hard workers and integrated very well into the British way of life adopting values and traditions of the UK.
Muzrats on the other hand refuse to integrate and demand their own stone age laws and rules; they're the scum of the earth in whatever country they infest.
Ah I see lol. White nationalists and Nazis really have become more modern lol. You do realize, you know just to let you in on your own history, that India contains Muslims? That Indians are not just Hindu?

Dr D, your liberalism is beginning to scare me... :lulz:
It makes me have hope. As I said even Nazi scum are more progressive than their 1930’s counterparts.
 
Wait so Indians who countries and kingdoms you guys invaded and colonized, their ancestors who moved to UK for whatever reason. You’re done with them, you would ship them out, or only Muslims.


It’s not about that, it’s about the fact they were waterboarding and it’s not admissible in court. That’s one reason, a legalistic and pragmatic reason why it was a huge mistake and in fact criminal to be doing that to them and there is nothing I hate more than Islamo-fascism. During WW2 with a lot more lives at state we didn’t waterboard Nazi officers or higher ups as policy.
We didn’t torture nazi officers bc they weren’t inferior savages. They were western people fighting a war, same as us.

Ramming planes into buildings and plotting other terror attacks is not the same as fighting a war.
 
We didn’t torture nazi officers bc they weren’t inferior savages. They were western people fighting a war, same as us.

Ramming planes into buildings and plotting other terror attacks is not the same as fighting a war.
Do you know what the Nazis did to civilians during operation Barbarossa and the Holocaust? The horrors and terrors they inflicted on innocent men, women, and children??

the nazis are just as fanatical and cruel and medieval as Al Queda and the Islamo-fascist ideology and religion that they hold to.

it does give one hope, doesn't it...btw, Hitler and his pals preferred the term "National Socialists", those progressives
Yes it’s like North Korea saying it’s the people’s democratic republic. It’s a sham and for show. Back in the 30s in Europe socialism didn’t have this negative connotation like it does today. Calling themselves socialist was a way of getting working class support. IN THE VERY BEGINNING of the Nazi party, it has factions that were left but those were pushed out, especially under Hitler and remnants were taken care of during this:

The Nazis weren’t socialist. Thats why the rich industrialist supported them because they would be protected. Also as soon as Hitler could he cracked down on socialists and communist and trade unions. The first concentration camps were not built for Jews but for the German left.

So trying to say the Nazis aren’t far-right, which they were, is absurd. It’s simply conservatives trying to abdicate responsibility for the Nazis of which they have some because as I said right wing forces and the ruling class were very cozy with Nazis in the beginning. Including a lot of the foreign ruling class and right wing forces.

Charles Limburg and America first in the USA. A revival of which used in Trump and his isolationism and rhetoric:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top