Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.
We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.
We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.
Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.
We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.
By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.
What exactly is wrong with the information that I posted?Wikipedia is the most dishonest manipulative propaganda machine that exists on the internet. I trust it even less than CNN ! All they do is run hit pieces and spread lies. There's so much "Miss - and - Diss" information still up and never corrected - you should see some of the crazy Covid lies still up, and shit about Trump that's been debunked AGES ago but they leave it up. It's a bullshit site.
I'm just pointing out that the source material from (Wikipedia) is deliberately biased and heavily tailors its writing to speak unfavorably about anybody who may be Conservative or not of their political 'liking'. Wikipedia covertly benefits financially from "War Hawks" in Government so of course they hate people like Hegseth. I expect there will be (if not already) additional negative rhetoric added to his Wiki page daily to make him look undesirable. I wrote my comment because I despise Wikipedia and it's manipulative dishonest tactics to sway political discourse.What exactly is wrong with the information that I posted?
so....... what part of what I posted from Wikipedia is actually false?I'm just pointing out that the source material from (Wikipedia) is deliberately biased and heavily tailors its writing to speak unfavorably about anybody who may be Conservative or not of their political 'liking'. Wikipedia covertly benefits financially from "War Hawks" in Government so of course they hate people like Hegseth. I expect there will be (if not already) additional negative rhetoric added to his Wiki page daily to make him look undesirable. I wrote my comment because I despise Wikipedia and it's manipulative dishonest tactics to sway political discourse.
That's the trick, if it's so full of misleading information it should be easy to bust. Seems they do a bit of research to get it right.so....... what part of what I posted from Wikipedia is actually false?
Seems to me that djdeeds is letting his conspiracy theories getting the better of him. It's one thing to say "they are full of shit!" and then not providing any evidence of the bullshit in the section of wikipedia that I literally copied and posted here.That's the trick, if it's so full of misleading information it should be easy to bust. Seems they do a bit of research to get it right.
The only use Wikipedia has is the "early life" section which is helpful for spotting JewsSeems to me that djdeeds is letting his conspiracy theories getting the better of him. It's one thing to say "they are full of shit!" and then not providing any evidence of the bullshit in the section of wikipedia that I literally copied and posted here.
Y'know... it's almost as if the crazies....... are just a bit crazy.

Wikipedia does seem to be keen on reporting an individual's bloodline. So and so, born on dot, to x-mother and y-father, with English and Welsh on mother's side, and Black and Indian on the father's side...The only use Wikipedia has is the "early life" section which is helpful for spotting Jews
![]()
Name one conspiracy theory you assert I believe in. My statement that Wikipedia actively manipulates the information on its pages to favor specific political stances is exactly what Wikipedia would label a "conspiracy theory" or "disinformation". They do a lot of lying by omission, or using words like - so and so was 'reported to have done ... or 'reported to have been' etc it wipes their hands of responsibility of spreading disinformation by claiming "Hey, it wasn't us that said it.. we're simply reporting it" then cites links to various (often dubious and corrupted so called news sources) I'm not gonna baby you mate , I have an opinion about Wiki being a manipulative tool used by corrupt organizations and so I made my comment.Seems to me that djdeeds is letting his conspiracy theories getting the better of him. It's one thing to say "they are full of shit!" and then not providing any evidence of the bullshit in the section of wikipedia that I literally copied and posted here.
Y'know... it's almost as if the crazies....... are just a bit crazy.
One of the things they do is lie by omission, This is a very good example of that... "He reportedly persuaded Trump to pardon three American soldiers accused or convicted of war crimes related to the shooting of non-combatants in Iraq."What exactly is wrong with the information that I posted?
Well you took it as a personal dig.... and posted a proper angry rant.Name one conspiracy theory you assert I believe in. My statement that Wikipedia actively manipulates the information on its pages to favor specific political stances is exactly what Wikipedia would label a "conspiracy theory" or "disinformation". They do a lot of lying by omission, or using words like - so and so was 'reported to have done ... or 'reported to have been' etc it wipes their hands of responsibility of spreading disinformation by claiming "Hey, it wasn't us that said it.. we're simply reporting it" then cites links to various (often dubious and corrupted so called news sources) I'm not gonna baby you mate , I have an opinion about Wiki being a manipulative tool used by corrupt organizations and so I made my comment.
Heck , Wiki themselves warn people against taking sources as 'wholly reliable'
You don't need to take it as a personal dig. People who happen to not lean to the extreme Left are not "conspiracy theorists by default" just because an opinion challenges a narrative. I'm not going to copy-paste 90% of Wikipedia just to bring you each and every example of nefarious bullshit posted on Wiki pages - you made it an argument when it didn't need to be one.Wikipedia:Don't cite Wikipedia on Wikipedia - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
agree or don't agree ... Wikipedia themselves even say ... “The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is not truth,” states Wikipedia’s official policy on the subject.
you decided to make it personal and call me crazy because of an opinion I made based on my observations of how Wiki operates. Maybe chill out .
| Allegiance |
|
|---|---|
| Branch/service | |
| Years of service | 2003–present |
| Rank | Major |
| Unit | Minnesota Army National Guard |
| Battles/wars | |
| Awards |
id say hes qualified to work for trump,as hes working on his 3rd ex wife.
but im not too sure about being qualified for the position. idk too much about him.s
It's usually the women who can't handle the military life so they initiate the divorce!
Yeah, but, I look at it this way - does a piece of paper in a frame on the wall make a better Doctor, Lawyer or teacher? I've seen people who are completely void of "qualifications" literally kick ASS in this world. I've seen enough conviction from this man in congress and during hearings to absolutely be sure he will do a great job... medals or not !!! - Results matter, not ribbons on a shirt.I find him a bit young (he's got 7 kids?), I don't know who he is and what military ranks and carrier he has and decorations he has, it would be important to know this
I saw Zelensky walking with a bald older white man in a suit who looked like a big animal who was discussing arms shipments with him in a US arms factory, I don't know his name but he also has something to do with the US military
Now I read his bio looks like he's a real soldier but I find his military rank too low I don't know how much experience this guy has with this.
Allegiance United States![]()
Branch/service United States Army![]()
Years of service 2003–present Rank Major Unit Minnesota Army National Guard Battles/wars Awards