• Adults Only Website 18+

    If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.

    We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.

    We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.

    Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.

    We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.

    By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.

War Ukraine Believes it Can Build its Own Nuclear Bombs from Spent Fuel Rods in Months: Report

Clam

Forum Veteran

1731724310333.webp
 
If they can why haven't they already built them?🤔🤔
EXACTLY ! - this is more of the PANIC response to Trump winning the election. All their dastardly plans are now going to be intercepted by a bunch of fuckers who aren't playing their game ... and like a sinking ship , all the RATS are scrambling !!
 
If they can why haven't they already built them?🤔🤔
Ukraine gave up their nuclear weapons years ago like mid 90s. They had nuclear capability before so, they probably didn't destroy the silos & infrastructure for it all. Just because they claimed to have relinquished all of their arsenal also doesn't mean they truly did either.
 
Any attempt to build a working bomb from spare parts is a recipe for disaster. Chernobyl 2.0 when the thing blows up in the garage they're building it in.
 
They still have soviet nukes in Ukraine. This is just an excuse as to where they came from once they end up using one! Oh right they made it over the month from spent fuel rods with McGuyver 😝🤣😅😅
That's what I think too. The UN probably said sure go ahead & use nukes but you better make sure it's well known beforehand the countries that have been sending you weapons didn't give you any & ends up blamed & it starts WW3 officially.
 
The first thing I ask myself is - why was this claim just published .. who published it? then figure out what their motivation is. Cos 100% it aint about Ukraine ACTUALLY being able to make nuclear weapons - that's like saying Nigeria is about to send a rocket to the moon using rubber bands and cherry bombs!
Ukraine is running a bunch of reactors so they do have the physicists ...

But the first sign of a practical nuke and Russia will pre empt it with something not built from reactor rods...

That's what I think too. The UN probably said sure go ahead & use nukes but you better make sure it's well known beforehand the countries that have been sending you weapons didn't give you any & ends up blamed & it starts WW3 officially.
Soviet nukes all went to Russia in 1994.
 
Sure they can. They could also colonize Mars, break the light barrier, and raise the dead if they wanted to. They just don't want to. Somebody sounds desperate for money. "Please papa donald! i suck yo dick!"
 
The first thing I ask myself is - why was this claim just published .. who published it? then figure out what their motivation is. Cos 100% it aint about Ukraine ACTUALLY being able to make nuclear weapons - that's like saying Nigeria is about to send a rocket to the moon using rubber bands and cherry bombs!
US, Britain or any other country would secretly provide Ukrop regime with nuc bomb. So if Ukrops will use it here is the "official" story how Zelensky regime "created" this bomb. That's why they already claiming it.
 
US, Britain or any other country would secretly provide Ukrop regime with nuc bomb. So if Ukrops will use it here is the "official" story how Zelensky regime "created" this bomb. That's why they already claiming it.
You really are 'off with the fairies' with this one (and so are others).
The difference between using nuclear power fusion/fission for a power source and refining it for 'weapons grade' is night & day, the only thing Ukraine could do with it is make 'dirty bombs' & if it did that NATO/US would dump them hard. Don't take my word for it, research it! (And don't forget to 'retard' me!)
Fusion - Frequently asked questions | IAEA

FWIW, the decision to hit Saddam because of WMD's was well-founded, WMD's take many forms, chemical (was found) bio-logical (was found) and nuclear, this is where it gets hmmmm, Saddam WAS importing piping from Germany that DID have the structural integrity to make a weapons-grade nuke and this is what got the US & UN (NOT NATO) all hot & bothered. ( I use the term 'piping' as special piping is required, but, so is a lot of other 'stuff' that sets off alarm bells )
Iraq and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia.
Some light reading, feel free to research it.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top