• Adults Only Website 18+

    If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.

    We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.

    We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.

    Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.

    We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.

    By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.

Trump officials defend deportations involving U.S. citizen children

From Axios:

Trump administration officials on Sunday defended the administration's aggressive crackdown on undocumented immigrants after immigration advocacy groups reported U.S. citizen children had been deported.

The big picture: Both Secretary of State Marco Rubio and President Trump's border czar Tom Homan in Sunday TV interviews denied the children, who were sent with their mothers from Louisiana to Honduras, had been deported.

Context: National Immigration Project said on Friday the New Orleans ICE Field Office "deported at least two families, including two mothers and their minor children — three of whom are U.S. citizen children aged 2, 4, and 7."

  • One of the mothers is pregnant and one child with "a rare form of metastatic cancer was deported without medication or the ability to consult with their treating physicians — despite ICE being notified in advance of the child's urgent medical needs," per the NIPNLG.
What they're saying: Rubio said on NBC News' "Meet The Press" it was the "mothers, who are illegally in this country," who were deported.

  • "The children went with their mothers. Those children are U.S. citizens. They can come back into the United States if there's their father or someone here who wants to assume them," he said.
  • "If someone is in this country unlawfully, illegally, that person gets deported. If that person is with a 2-year-old child or has a 2-year-old child and says, I want to take my child ... with me, well, then what? You have two choices," he said.
  • "You can say yes, of course you can take your child, whether they're a citizen or not, because it's your child; or you can say yes, you can go, but your child must stay behind. And then your headlines would read: 'U.S. holding hostage 2-year-old, 4-year-old, 7-year-old, while mother deported."
Homan said on CBS News' "Face The Nation" that "children aren't deported."

  • He added: "The mother chose to take the children with her — when you enter the country illegally, and you know you're here illegally, and you choose to have a U.S. citizen child, that's on you. That's not on this administration."
  • CBS' Margaret Brennan noted a Trump-appointed judge said Friday a 2-year-old U.S. citizen was sent with their deported mother to Honduras "with no meaningful process."
  • Homan said he disagreed with the judge and "that female had due process at great taxpayer expense."
The other side: National Immigration Project executive director Sirine Shebaya in an emailed statement Sunday evening called statements that the children weren't deported "willfully misleading."

  • Shebaya said Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials were "well aware before deporting the children that there were legal custodians and family members who were ready and willing to care for them" in the U.S.
  • "They did not offer either of the mothers any alternatives to having their children deported with them," Shebaya said.
  • Both families "made multiple requests for the U.S. citizen children to be released to caregivers and those requests were denied" and they and attorneys had requests to speak to the mothers denied.
  • "The mothers were held incommunicado, in complete isolation and without the ability to speak with anyone in order to make arrangements for their children to stay here," Shebaya added.
  • "The mothers also had legal options available to them that they could have pursued had they been given an opportunity to do so. What began as a routine check-in turned into yet another senseless deportation and family separation."
  • Representatives for ICE and the State Department did not immediately respond to Axios' requests for comment in the evening.
Go deeper: ICE decides who's linked to gangs, border czar says



Link: https://www.axios.com/2025/04/27/trump-deportations-us-citizen-children-immigrantsP
 
Blacks Are More A Problem Than Immigration
IMG_1747.webp
 
From Axios:

Trump administration officials on Sunday defended the administration's aggressive crackdown on undocumented immigrants after immigration advocacy groups reported U.S. citizen children had been deported.

The big picture: Both Secretary of State Marco Rubio and President Trump's border czar Tom Homan in Sunday TV interviews denied the children, who were sent with their mothers from Louisiana to Honduras, had been deported.

Context: National Immigration Project said on Friday the New Orleans ICE Field Office "deported at least two families, including two mothers and their minor children — three of whom are U.S. citizen children aged 2, 4, and 7."

  • One of the mothers is pregnant and one child with "a rare form of metastatic cancer was deported without medication or the ability to consult with their treating physicians — despite ICE being notified in advance of the child's urgent medical needs," per the NIPNLG.
What they're saying: Rubio said on NBC News' "Meet The Press" it was the "mothers, who are illegally in this country," who were deported.

  • "The children went with their mothers. Those children are U.S. citizens. They can come back into the United States if there's their father or someone here who wants to assume them," he said.
  • "If someone is in this country unlawfully, illegally, that person gets deported. If that person is with a 2-year-old child or has a 2-year-old child and says, I want to take my child ... with me, well, then what? You have two choices," he said.
  • "You can say yes, of course you can take your child, whether they're a citizen or not, because it's your child; or you can say yes, you can go, but your child must stay behind. And then your headlines would read: 'U.S. holding hostage 2-year-old, 4-year-old, 7-year-old, while mother deported."
Homan said on CBS News' "Face The Nation" that "children aren't deported."

  • He added: "The mother chose to take the children with her — when you enter the country illegally, and you know you're here illegally, and you choose to have a U.S. citizen child, that's on you. That's not on this administration."
  • CBS' Margaret Brennan noted a Trump-appointed judge said Friday a 2-year-old U.S. citizen was sent with their deported mother to Honduras "with no meaningful process."
  • Homan said he disagreed with the judge and "that female had due process at great taxpayer expense."
The other side: National Immigration Project executive director Sirine Shebaya in an emailed statement Sunday evening called statements that the children weren't deported "willfully misleading."

  • Shebaya said Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials were "well aware before deporting the children that there were legal custodians and family members who were ready and willing to care for them" in the U.S.
  • "They did not offer either of the mothers any alternatives to having their children deported with them," Shebaya said.
  • Both families "made multiple requests for the U.S. citizen children to be released to caregivers and those requests were denied" and they and attorneys had requests to speak to the mothers denied.
  • "The mothers were held incommunicado, in complete isolation and without the ability to speak with anyone in order to make arrangements for their children to stay here," Shebaya added.
  • "The mothers also had legal options available to them that they could have pursued had they been given an opportunity to do so. What began as a routine check-in turned into yet another senseless deportation and family separation."
  • Representatives for ICE and the State Department did not immediately respond to Axios' requests for comment in the evening.
Go deeper: ICE decides who's linked to gangs, border czar says



Link: https://www.axios.com/2025/04/27/trump-deportations-us-citizen-children-immigrantsP
And if they would have let the “us citizen children stay” the headlines would read “trump separated children from their mother” it’s a lose lose situation. So fuck off! Just because you come here illegally and have children, your children shouldn’t be fucking us citizens.
 
And if they would have let the “us citizen children stay” the headlines would read “trump separated children from their mother” it’s a lose lose situation. So fuck off! Just because you come here illegally and have children, your children shouldn’t be fucking us citizens.
Don't expect an intelligent response from Christopher Bitchens on this. He's a liberal dipshit that has admitted to sucking a dudes dick and supports trannies reading to school children.
 
And if they would have let the “us citizen children stay” the headlines would read “trump separated children from their mother” it’s a lose lose situation. So fuck off! Just because you come here illegally and have children, your children shouldn’t be fucking us citizens.
Yes that’s probably true a lot of headlines would say that.

Also, you may not like it but that’s what it says in the constitution. I don’t think the current system is good though, something needs to change but not just deporting people especially citizens.
 
Don't expect an intelligent response from Christopher Bitchens on this. He's a liberal dipshit that has admitted to sucking a dudes dick and supports trannies reading to school children.
I’m not a liberal first off. Second, you’ve definitely done some gay shit in your life Sabu, let’s get real. Thirdly, I love you baby.
 
And if they would have let the “us citizen children stay” the headlines would read “trump separated children from their mother” it’s a lose lose situation. So fuck off! Just because you come here illegally and have children, your children shouldn’t be fucking us citizens.
pretty much what i was gunna say,till i read this. but yes,if ice separated the kids from their mothers,then the headlines would be worse. but you didnt hear of anything like this when obama was in office. oh no. god forbid if that ever got out. :rolleyes:


its gunna happen regardless. but its ok for these kids to come here without a parent. they have a guardian who rapes them along the way then once here,leaves them high and dry. but you dont hear about that on the news! but keep fighting for these people who are scumbags. we know where your priorities lie.
 
From Axios:

Trump administration officials on Sunday defended the administration's aggressive crackdown on undocumented immigrants after immigration advocacy groups reported U.S. citizen children had been deported.

The big picture: Both Secretary of State Marco Rubio and President Trump's border czar Tom Homan in Sunday TV interviews denied the children, who were sent with their mothers from Louisiana to Honduras, had been deported.

Context: National Immigration Project said on Friday the New Orleans ICE Field Office "deported at least two families, including two mothers and their minor children — three of whom are U.S. citizen children aged 2, 4, and 7."

  • One of the mothers is pregnant and one child with "a rare form of metastatic cancer was deported without medication or the ability to consult with their treating physicians — despite ICE being notified in advance of the child's urgent medical needs," per the NIPNLG.
What they're saying: Rubio said on NBC News' "Meet The Press" it was the "mothers, who are illegally in this country," who were deported.

  • "The children went with their mothers. Those children are U.S. citizens. They can come back into the United States if there's their father or someone here who wants to assume them," he said.
  • "If someone is in this country unlawfully, illegally, that person gets deported. If that person is with a 2-year-old child or has a 2-year-old child and says, I want to take my child ... with me, well, then what? You have two choices," he said.
  • "You can say yes, of course you can take your child, whether they're a citizen or not, because it's your child; or you can say yes, you can go, but your child must stay behind. And then your headlines would read: 'U.S. holding hostage 2-year-old, 4-year-old, 7-year-old, while mother deported."
Homan said on CBS News' "Face The Nation" that "children aren't deported."

  • He added: "The mother chose to take the children with her — when you enter the country illegally, and you know you're here illegally, and you choose to have a U.S. citizen child, that's on you. That's not on this administration."
  • CBS' Margaret Brennan noted a Trump-appointed judge said Friday a 2-year-old U.S. citizen was sent with their deported mother to Honduras "with no meaningful process."
  • Homan said he disagreed with the judge and "that female had due process at great taxpayer expense."
The other side: National Immigration Project executive director Sirine Shebaya in an emailed statement Sunday evening called statements that the children weren't deported "willfully misleading."

  • Shebaya said Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials were "well aware before deporting the children that there were legal custodians and family members who were ready and willing to care for them" in the U.S.
  • "They did not offer either of the mothers any alternatives to having their children deported with them," Shebaya said.
  • Both families "made multiple requests for the U.S. citizen children to be released to caregivers and those requests were denied" and they and attorneys had requests to speak to the mothers denied.
  • "The mothers were held incommunicado, in complete isolation and without the ability to speak with anyone in order to make arrangements for their children to stay here," Shebaya added.
  • "The mothers also had legal options available to them that they could have pursued had they been given an opportunity to do so. What began as a routine check-in turned into yet another senseless deportation and family separation."
  • Representatives for ICE and the State Department did not immediately respond to Axios' requests for comment in the evening.
Go deeper: ICE decides who's linked to gangs, border czar says



Link: https://www.axios.com/2025/04/27/trump-deportations-us-citizen-children-immigrantsP
Get them ALL out!!!
 
I'm not like you. I haven't done "gay shit." Continue being a useless, jobless strange looking piss ant. And yes, you're a liberal.
You’d never admit it if you did. It doesn’t matter if you did anyway because I’m not homophobic like you and don’t think it’s a bad thing. I’m not strange looking I’m sexy. No I am not a liberal. I am a leftist. I’m to the left of liberals. I have major problems with liberals. I think they always want it both ways and fence sit too much and always cone up with excuses why change or justice can’t happen now.

I’ll explain this not just for you but others who misunderstand. I’m not a liberal I’m a leftist get it right. I call myself a classical leftist, which is a term I came up with. It’s a play on the term “classical liberal” which is an out of fashion term now but was quite popular like 10 years ago.

I call myself this because the politics I most admire and identify with, and think is the most principled is the pre and especially post 1917 Bolshevik revolution socialists and anarchists and leftists who were internationalists, anti-totalitarian, anti-Stalin, pro-democracy and who were pro-enlightenment, by that meaning for things like individual rights, free expression, rule of law, secularism, the great products of The Enlightenment.

Probably most exemplified, in English anyway, by George Orwell. Christopher Hitchens, my personal favorite, was a relic of this glorious leftist past. A great American that has been written out of the record, Eugene Debs: Eugene V. Debs - Wikipedia

Great socialists who were leaders in the civil rights movement. Again written out of the record and now thought by most people to be Christian reverend led only: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayard_Rustin

People outside the Anglo-Sphere:
Rosa Luxemburg - Wikipedia
Karl Liebknecht - Wikipedia
Victor Serge - Wikipedia
Arthur Koestler - Wikipedia
Emma Goldman - Wikipedia
To a lesser extent: Leon Trotsky - Wikipedia
There are others as well.

I have principles and they are more important than my politics but if I had to identify the old school hard anti-totalitarian left are the gold standard to me in terms of politics, the top of the pyramid and it’s who I most identify with that’s why I call myself a classical leftist

Oh and I should add, most of the modern American and Western European left, since starting in the 80s I’d say, began to abandoned all the principles that made them the gold standard. Which is why I separate between classical and modern. I am disgusted with a lot of the modern hard left. People who call themselves socialist and progressive. I could elaborate on that but I’ve written too much already.
 
You’d never admit it if you did. It doesn’t matter if you did anyway because I’m not homophobic like you and don’t think it’s a bad thing. I’m not strange looking I’m sexy. No I am not a liberal. I am a leftist. I’m to the left of liberals. I have major problems with liberals. I think they always want it both ways and fence sit too much and always cone up with excuses why change or justice can’t happen now.

I’ll explain this not just for you but others who misunderstand. I’m not a liberal I’m a leftist get it right. I call myself a classical leftist, which is a term I came up with. It’s a play on the term “classical liberal” which is an out of fashion term now but was quite popular like 10 years ago.

I call myself this because the politics I most admire and identify with, and think is the most principled is the pre and especially post 1917 Bolshevik revolution socialists and anarchists and leftists who were internationalists, anti-totalitarian, anti-Stalin, pro-democracy and who were pro-enlightenment, by that meaning for things like individual rights, free expression, rule of law, secularism, the great products of The Enlightenment.

Probably most exemplified, in English anyway, by George Orwell. Christopher Hitchens, my personal favorite, was a relic of this glorious leftist past. A great American that has been written out of the record, Eugene Debs: Eugene V. Debs - Wikipedia

Great socialists who were leaders in the civil rights movement. Again written out of the record and now thought by most people to be Christian reverend led only: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayard_Rustin

People outside the Anglo-Sphere:
Rosa Luxemburg - Wikipedia
Karl Liebknecht - Wikipedia
Victor Serge - Wikipedia
Arthur Koestler - Wikipedia
Emma Goldman - Wikipedia
To a lesser extent: Leon Trotsky - Wikipedia
There are others as well.

I have principles and they are more important than my politics but if I had to identify the old school hard anti-totalitarian left are the gold standard to me in terms of politics, the top of the pyramid and it’s who I most identify with that’s why I call myself a classical leftist

Oh and I should add, most of the modern American and Western European left, since starting in the 80s I’d say, began to abandoned all the principles that made them the gold standard. Which is why I separate between classical and modern. I am disgusted with a lot of the modern hard left. People who call themselves socialist and progressive. I could elaborate on that but I’ve written too much already.

Bernie was squashed by the DNC in 2020 yet his net worth grew.
 
You’d never admit it if you did. It doesn’t matter if you did anyway because I’m not homophobic like you and don’t think it’s a bad thing. I’m not strange looking I’m sexy. No I am not a liberal. I am a leftist. I’m to the left of liberals. I have major problems with liberals. I think they always want it both ways and fence sit too much and always cone up with excuses why change or justice can’t happen now.

I’ll explain this not just for you but others who misunderstand. I’m not a liberal I’m a leftist get it right. I call myself a classical leftist, which is a term I came up with. It’s a play on the term “classical liberal” which is an out of fashion term now but was quite popular like 10 years ago.

I call myself this because the politics I most admire and identify with, and think is the most principled is the pre and especially post 1917 Bolshevik revolution socialists and anarchists and leftists who were internationalists, anti-totalitarian, anti-Stalin, pro-democracy and who were pro-enlightenment, by that meaning for things like individual rights, free expression, rule of law, secularism, the great products of The Enlightenment.

Probably most exemplified, in English anyway, by George Orwell. Christopher Hitchens, my personal favorite, was a relic of this glorious leftist past. A great American that has been written out of the record, Eugene Debs: Eugene V. Debs - Wikipedia

Great socialists who were leaders in the civil rights movement. Again written out of the record and now thought by most people to be Christian reverend led only: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayard_Rustin

People outside the Anglo-Sphere:
Rosa Luxemburg - Wikipedia
Karl Liebknecht - Wikipedia
Victor Serge - Wikipedia
Arthur Koestler - Wikipedia
Emma Goldman - Wikipedia
To a lesser extent: Leon Trotsky - Wikipedia
There are others as well.

I have principles and they are more important than my politics but if I had to identify the old school hard anti-totalitarian left are the gold standard to me in terms of politics, the top of the pyramid and it’s who I most identify with that’s why I call myself a classical leftist

Oh and I should add, most of the modern American and Western European left, since starting in the 80s I’d say, began to abandoned all the principles that made them the gold standard. Which is why I separate between classical and modern. I am disgusted with a lot of the modern hard left. People who call themselves socialist and progressive. I could elaborate on that but I’ve written too much already.
I'm not homophonic. I just know you sucked a dick so, you're gay. I'm not reading the rest of your wall of text. Eat shit and as always, get a job.
 
You’d never admit it if you did. It doesn’t matter if you did anyway because I’m not homophobic like you and don’t think it’s a bad thing. I’m not strange looking I’m sexy. No I am not a liberal. I am a leftist. I’m to the left of liberals. I have major problems with liberals. I think they always want it both ways and fence sit too much and always cone up with excuses why change or justice can’t happen now.

I’ll explain this not just for you but others who misunderstand. I’m not a liberal I’m a leftist get it right. I call myself a classical leftist, which is a term I came up with. It’s a play on the term “classical liberal” which is an out of fashion term now but was quite popular like 10 years ago.
It seems your world moves around wikipedia.
Tell to a "classic" leftist that you like sucking dick and see trannies around children and you'll be hanged from a tree.
You're trully are a clueless moron.
 
From Axios:

Trump administration officials on Sunday defended the administration's aggressive crackdown on undocumented immigrants after immigration advocacy groups reported U.S. citizen children had been deported.

The big picture: Both Secretary of State Marco Rubio and President Trump's border czar Tom Homan in Sunday TV interviews denied the children, who were sent with their mothers from Louisiana to Honduras, had been deported.

Context: National Immigration Project said on Friday the New Orleans ICE Field Office "deported at least two families, including two mothers and their minor children — three of whom are U.S. citizen children aged 2, 4, and 7."

  • One of the mothers is pregnant and one child with "a rare form of metastatic cancer was deported without medication or the ability to consult with their treating physicians — despite ICE being notified in advance of the child's urgent medical needs," per the NIPNLG.
What they're saying: Rubio said on NBC News' "Meet The Press" it was the "mothers, who are illegally in this country," who were deported.

  • "The children went with their mothers. Those children are U.S. citizens. They can come back into the United States if there's their father or someone here who wants to assume them," he said.
  • "If someone is in this country unlawfully, illegally, that person gets deported. If that person is with a 2-year-old child or has a 2-year-old child and says, I want to take my child ... with me, well, then what? You have two choices," he said.
  • "You can say yes, of course you can take your child, whether they're a citizen or not, because it's your child; or you can say yes, you can go, but your child must stay behind. And then your headlines would read: 'U.S. holding hostage 2-year-old, 4-year-old, 7-year-old, while mother deported."
Homan said on CBS News' "Face The Nation" that "children aren't deported."

  • He added: "The mother chose to take the children with her — when you enter the country illegally, and you know you're here illegally, and you choose to have a U.S. citizen child, that's on you. That's not on this administration."
  • CBS' Margaret Brennan noted a Trump-appointed judge said Friday a 2-year-old U.S. citizen was sent with their deported mother to Honduras "with no meaningful process."
  • Homan said he disagreed with the judge and "that female had due process at great taxpayer expense."
The other side: National Immigration Project executive director Sirine Shebaya in an emailed statement Sunday evening called statements that the children weren't deported "willfully misleading."

  • Shebaya said Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials were "well aware before deporting the children that there were legal custodians and family members who were ready and willing to care for them" in the U.S.
  • "They did not offer either of the mothers any alternatives to having their children deported with them," Shebaya said.
  • Both families "made multiple requests for the U.S. citizen children to be released to caregivers and those requests were denied" and they and attorneys had requests to speak to the mothers denied.
  • "The mothers were held incommunicado, in complete isolation and without the ability to speak with anyone in order to make arrangements for their children to stay here," Shebaya added.
  • "The mothers also had legal options available to them that they could have pursued had they been given an opportunity to do so. What began as a routine check-in turned into yet another senseless deportation and family separation."
  • Representatives for ICE and the State Department did not immediately respond to Axios' requests for comment in the evening.
Go deeper: ICE decides who's linked to gangs, border czar says



Link: https://www.axios.com/2025/04/27/trump-deportations-us-citizen-children-immigrantsP
They didn’t want family’s separated. Now they can be deported together
 
You’d never admit it if you did. It doesn’t matter if you did anyway because I’m not homophobic like you and don’t think it’s a bad thing. I’m not strange looking I’m sexy. No I am not a liberal. I am a leftist. I’m to the left of liberals. I have major problems with liberals. I think they always want it both ways and fence sit too much and always cone up with excuses why change or justice can’t happen now.

I’ll explain this not just for you but others who misunderstand. I’m not a liberal I’m a leftist get it right. I call myself a classical leftist, which is a term I came up with. It’s a play on the term “classical liberal” which is an out of fashion term now but was quite popular like 10 years ago.

I call myself this because the politics I most admire and identify with, and think is the most principled is the pre and especially post 1917 Bolshevik revolution socialists and anarchists and leftists who were internationalists, anti-totalitarian, anti-Stalin, pro-democracy and who were pro-enlightenment, by that meaning for things like individual rights, free expression, rule of law, secularism, the great products of The Enlightenment.

Probably most exemplified, in English anyway, by George Orwell. Christopher Hitchens, my personal favorite, was a relic of this glorious leftist past. A great American that has been written out of the record, Eugene Debs: Eugene V. Debs - Wikipedia

Great socialists who were leaders in the civil rights movement. Again written out of the record and now thought by most people to be Christian reverend led only: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayard_Rustin

People outside the Anglo-Sphere:
Rosa Luxemburg - Wikipedia
Karl Liebknecht - Wikipedia
Victor Serge - Wikipedia
Arthur Koestler - Wikipedia
Emma Goldman - Wikipedia
To a lesser extent: Leon Trotsky - Wikipedia
There are others as well.

I have principles and they are more important than my politics but if I had to identify the old school hard anti-totalitarian left are the gold standard to me in terms of politics, the top of the pyramid and it’s who I most identify with that’s why I call myself a classical leftist

Oh and I should add, most of the modern American and Western European left, since starting in the 80s I’d say, began to abandoned all the principles that made them the gold standard. Which is why I separate between classical and modern. I am disgusted with a lot of the modern hard left. People who call themselves socialist and progressive. I could elaborate on that but I’ve written too much already.
This wall of text tells me you are young and never faced a hardship in your life. Your naivety has been shaped by your lack of life experiences.

You’ll become a Republican one day. When you buy a home and some city council tells you your taxes have to pay for a homeless tent city 2 blocks away. And then your shit gets broken into and a bum shits on your couch that you saved up to buy.
 
Back
Top