If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.
We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.
We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.
Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.
We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.
By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.
Past civilizations that were wiped out were highly advanced. At the end of the ice age humans were pretty much knocked back to the stone age about 11,000 years ago. We're discovering advanced architecture that predates the invention of the wheel by thousands of years.
Not to mention, the law of convergent evolution has a big space in it for non-homosapien humanoids, that is creatures that evolved into humanoids with nearly identical body structure to us with similar brain capacity and motor skills but that evolved separately from placental mammals entirely - like from marsupials or dinosaurs.
I'd love to see evidence of that as it would be fascinating but alas is doesn't exist because its not true.
What they taught us in school was wrong. Its amazing how much we have progressed in the last 200 years and your willing to say we stayed hunter gatherers for thousands? Almost doesnt make any sense. They are finding lost cities up and down the Amazon thanx to lydar technology. Why do you think they cant explain the pyramids? Its because an advanced civilization built them got wiped out and the egyptians built on top of them. They think the original head on the sphinx was a dog head. Research the site of Gobekli tepe. Its located in Turkey I believe. It predates the invention of the wheel. New science man! Gotta keep up. The timspan of humans is about to be rewritten.
Thanks for your response RattleHead.
Absolutely my guy, this is my shit also. I found a series completely on the exact subject.Thanks for your response RattleHead.
I'm very interested in archaeology and did some at uni, though did not major in it. I did major in anthropology/sociology so I'm good with the basics.
Have a look at Von Danikin's Chariots of the Gods which was fascinating and the TV show was incredible but it was all fraudulent. Von Daniken raised the idea that the pyramids were so advanced that the ancient Egyptians could never have built them. However, theoretical studies have shown that the areas upon which the pyramids sit could have easily been made level by hammering in stakes of equal length in a flooded area to the waters level and then draining and digging down to the ends of them and thus a perfectly level platform to build on.
Von Daniken came up with Alien help as the only possible reason.
Only homo sapien sapien and neanderthal were 'modern hominids' who cohabitated, although the neanderthal had been around for between 350 and 800 000 years, homo sapien sapien for 200 to 250000 years. Neandethals died out 40 000 years ago due to learning difficulties compared with us.
Some interbreeding took place as many European people have neanderthal DNA.
But the further back you go in time the less sophisticated and intelligent the hominids are. So 800 000 years ago we are looking at neanderthals as the most intelligent animals on earth. And evidence suggests that they had just enough smarts to make fire, to have an inkling of an after life (grave goods and flowers used in burials) but were not smart or adaptable enough to survive into modernity. And certainly no metallurgy, spear throwing levers, bows and arrows or any other modern technology.
For incredibly claims incredible evidence is needed, which appears lacking in this example.
I'd love to be proved wrong on this but this aint doing it.
And I said about hunter-gatherers that we remained thus for hundreds of thousands of years. It's only in the past 10 000 years that we began to get our shit together. First city 5000 years BC, first use of metal 5000 years ago. First use of iron 1200 BC. First use of engines 1700 AD. Agrarian revolution 1600 AD, industrial revolution 200 years ago, first photo 1832, and so on...
For humans, hunting and gathering has been the norm for 99.9% of existence. We can't handle cities and did not evolve to handle them. Look at the problems...
Erich von Däniken - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Very interesting, have you heard of the book of giants? It was retrieved with the dead Sea Scrolls. Check into the interpretations of those writings. It has alot to do with what you have spoken of. Such as fallen angels crossbreeding species.
it is very common to discredit things we dont know and NO professional wants their name erased from history books.
Exactly! They even ignore new discoveries in the fear it will disprove current theories. Sad really.
The humans have most likely been wiped out and only s few left and that had to start again possibly MANY times. Many Many i imagine. Humans have possibly been arohnd for millions of years and people think they didnt create technology or metal or anything in those years. Seems hard to belivr to be honest.
What about Joseph Smith? He found some stones and a weird eye thingy that helped him translate the stones, and they said that America was original Jew land. And these jewmans were wiped out by the Indians. These jewmans were highly advanced and their being pre dates the timeline of what is excepted of the Americas.Thanks for your response RattleHead.
I'm very interested in archaeology and did some at uni, though did not major in it. I did major in anthropology/sociology so I'm good with the basics.
Have a look at Von Danikin's Chariots of the Gods which was fascinating and the TV show was incredible but it was all fraudulent. Von Daniken raised the idea that the pyramids were so advanced that the ancient Egyptians could never have built them. However, theoretical studies have shown that the areas upon which the pyramids sit could have easily been made level by hammering in stakes of equal length in a flooded area to the waters level and then draining and digging down to the ends of them and thus a perfectly level platform to build on.
Von Daniken came up with Alien help as the only possible reason.
Only homo sapien sapien and neanderthal were 'modern hominids' who cohabitated, although the neanderthal had been around for between 350 and 800 000 years, homo sapien sapien for 200 to 250000 years. Neandethals died out 40 000 years ago due to learning difficulties compared with us.
Some interbreeding took place as many European people have neanderthal DNA.
But the further back you go in time the less sophisticated and intelligent the hominids are. So 800 000 years ago we are looking at neanderthals as the most intelligent animals on earth. And evidence suggests that they had just enough smarts to make fire, to have an inkling of an after life (grave goods and flowers used in burials) but were not smart or adaptable enough to survive into modernity. And certainly no metallurgy, spear throwing levers, bows and arrows or any other modern technology.
For incredibly claims incredible evidence is needed, which appears lacking in this example.
I'd love to be proved wrong on this but this aint doing it.
And I said about hunter-gatherers that we remained thus for hundreds of thousands of years. It's only in the past 10 000 years that we began to get our shit together. First city 5000 years BC, first use of metal 5000 years ago. First use of iron 1200 BC. First use of engines 1700 AD. Agrarian revolution 1600 AD, industrial revolution 200 years ago, first photo 1832, and so on...
For humans, hunting and gathering has been the norm for 99.9% of existence. We can't handle cities and did not evolve to handle them. Look at the problems...
Erich von Däniken - Wikipedia
Convergent evolution is based on the same environmental influences creating similar evolutionary outcomes. The reason your theory of other humanoids from different lineages falls over is because there's a difference between niche partitioning and convergent evolution. We create our own environment, animals adjust to earthly environments placed upon them. What we've done is remarkably unique whereas convergent evolution is remarkably common. The animals you compare above have huge differences along with their similarities too. With enough time we may still have cat overlords but it's unlikely because we have guns. And cats have no thumbs. And other reasons.
You do realise that the OP didnt make the video with info. She’s just reporting the news..
