• Adults Only Website 18+

    If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.

    We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.

    We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.

    Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.

    We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.

    By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.

Charlie Kirk got Shot

That’s like saying we have roads, so why require driver’s tests?

Ranges allow for practice, but they don’t ensure fundamental competence or safety knowledge... they assume it.

Training isn’t about restricting rights, it’s about ensuring those rights are exercised responsibly, safely, and effectively.

Without baseline standards, you risk arising incompetence, not empowering liberty.
Pretty much answering your own question there.
 
Was never a conversation, pussy. I made statements and you think you’re clever to offer ChatGPT rebuttals. Fuck off
Spoken like someone who can’t defend their own position, so you project, you insult, and you dismiss.

If my reasoning seems polished, it’s because I have a position worth defending, while you have nothing but empty aggression.

Goodbye.
 
Charlie was an evil man but I have zero tolerance for political violence.
Not for violence as a collective but only solely and to be very specific “political” violence? No dipshit, what you actually meant to say was that you don’t believe that this guy should’ve been chilled for his political stance etc. and we a both in alignment with that but the more that I learn about this tool, the more that I believe he spoke himself into a pack.

After watching all that human transmission fluid spew from his intake valve, the 1st thing that came to my mind was What type of material was that T-shirt made of I mean not one stain on that crispy white T.

I want to picture of Charlie Kirk on the front of a white T so bad but it wouldn’t be a great gesture if it was the same type of shirt
Second thought I’d rather get a photo of the T Shrit that Kirk was off’d in and put that on front of a t-shirt, being that it stood the test of time without stain or blemish.. meanwhile Kirk. well. you know. Shout out to Kirk’s TShirt
 
Right? It’s not limiting freedom, it’s making sure people don’t hurt themselves or others while exercising it. Wild concept for some to grasp apparently.
No, I don't understand the point.
If the pain and weight of the decision are so heavy that it should only be up to the people directly affected, then what ethical authority does any philosophy have to take that choice away and force one state-approved outcome?

If it’s truly “none of our business,” then the logical conclusion is to protect the family’s right to decide... not legally force them down one path.
The decision is left to state lawmakers and the family is allowed to move to whichever state they feel suits their way of living.

Philosophy is useless when simple facts provide an answer.
 
Spoken like someone who can’t defend their own position, so you project, you insult, and you dismiss.

If my reasoning seems polished, it’s because I have a position worth defending, while you have nothing but empty aggression.

Goodbye.
Your only position is to question others, that doesn’t make you superior it makes you hollow.

Goodbye (fuck off)
 
No, I don't understand the point.

The decision is left to state lawmakers and the family is allowed to move to whichever state they feel suits their way of living.

Philosophy is useless when simple facts provide an answer.
Yes, you clearly don’t get the point.

In what reality does the “just move” argument hold up for the average person? Since when is picking up your life, job, and family to cross state lines a simple or realistic solution for everyone?

That’s not a policy, it’s a privilege. And it’s pretty ironic to say the decision should be left to “the family” while also supporting a system where lawmakers (not families) get the final say.

If it’s really none of our business, why make it the state’s business instead of theirs?
 
Yes, you clearly don’t get the point.

In what reality does the “just move” argument hold up for the average person? Since when is picking up your life, job, and family to cross state lines a simple or realistic solution for everyone?

That’s not a policy, it’s a privilege. And it’s pretty ironic to say the decision should be left to “the family” while also supporting a system where lawmakers (not families) get the final say.

If it’s really none of our business, why make it the state’s business instead of theirs?
Since when has there been a solution to anything that satisfied "everyone", for anything?

You seem to think there's a "cure all" type answer for whatever questions you have.

No state can prevent somebody from taking a trip to another state for an abortion. They don't even have to move.
 
Since when has there been a solution to anything that satisfied "everyone", for anything?

You seem to think there's a "cure all" type answer for whatever questions you have.

No state can prevent somebody from taking a trip to another state for an abortion. They don't even have to move.
You're right... no solution satisfies everyone. But suggesting travel as a fix ignores reality because not everyone can afford time off, cross-state travel, or childcare.

This doesn't solve the problem, it filters it by wealth.

You say the decision should be left to families, yet you defend a system where lawmakers override those very families based on their own moral views.

If it's truly a private decision, why should the state have any say at all?

Should your ability to make personal medical decisions really depend on your zip code or bank account?
 
You're right... no solution satisfies everyone. But suggesting travel as a fix ignores reality because not everyone can afford time off, cross-state travel, or childcare.

This doesn't solve the problem, it filters it by wealth.

You say the decision should be left to families, yet you defend a system where lawmakers override those very families based on their own moral views.

If it's truly a private decision, why should the state have any say at all?

Should your ability to make personal medical decisions really depend on your zip code or bank account?
Your mental gymnastics are pointless.

How expensive do you think it is to go to another state for a day? Get a grip.
 
Your mental gymnastics are pointless.

How expensive do you think it is to go to another state for a day? Get a grip.
You reduced a complex ethical argument to the cost of gas... completely ignoring the point about autonomy, privilege, and the role of the state.

But sure, call it "mental gymnastics" instead of acknowledging real barriers.
 
You reduced a complex ethical argument to the cost of gas... completely ignoring the point about autonomy, privilege, and the role of the state.

But sure, call it "mental gymnastics" instead of acknowledging real barriers.
My autonomy as a US citizen is within my control.

Ten year olds aren't getting knocked up left and right, so to even debate that is practically pointless. Solution? Better parenting.

Fuck off.
 
not even the goodest of goys get a happy ending :mybad:
Actually, as far as 💀 is concerned.. fast is always good, when you do never get the opportunity to suffer theres no reason to fight it and suffer you're not cognizant of what's going on, it's simply over.. now that's actually a great ending.🕺🏻🪄
 
Back
Top