• Adults Only Website 18+

    If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.

    We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.

    We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.

    Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.

    We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.

    By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.

Charlie Kirk got Shot

He is one of those 25-50 year old far-right influences who persuaded younger men to lean evermore right ward and to adopt pretty backwards views of women, what it means to be a man, economics, transgendered people, and every other fascist ideology. He was very smug; he was incredibly good at rationalising nazi-adjacent talking points with intellectual/academic speech and rhetoric. It was dangerous because it almost makes sense to the unread eye or the untrained ear.
^ you've almost perfectly described me to the younger males in my extended family, i'm a beacon to the old ways of thinking
ps - i can already tell that you're an imbecile, so go back under your rock
 
^ you've almost perfectly described me to the younger males in my extended family, i'm a beacon to the old ways of thinking
ps - i can already tell that you're an imbecile, so go back under your rock
I was resisting calling the guy a fucking pansy ass, thanks for expressing it for us all

As I was negging this loser this is what I've learned about them. They are either a trans faggot or someone who sympathizes with them. They are an "ex-cutter/self-harmer. They love to call people that they don't know racist. Yup, this queer isn't going to enjoy their time here if they don't stay in their lane...
 
I was resisting calling the guy a fucking pansy ass, thanks for expressing it for us all

As I was negging this loser this is what I've learned about them. They are either a trans faggot or someone who sympathizes with them. They are an "ex-cutter/self-harmer. They love to call people that they don't know racist. Yup, this queer isn't going to enjoy their time here if they don't stay in their lane...
i didn't even know all that, i just knew he was coming across as a weirdo ... he's one of those misguided losers fucking up society and our lives
 
And yet, we do not know even now (months later) what the motivation was for the shooting. This redefinition of pretty clear recent histiry, such as Charlie Kirk being murdered merely because he hurt someone's feelings is wrong. Look at any thread underneath a mob justice, cartel killing, or accidental desth video on this site, and you will see exactly how death is regarded here. No one here is delicate, but I understand why it is tempting to paint "lefties" as such because being tough and supporting the status quo is ideal for short-term luxuriation. This violence of which you speak is RARELY perpetrated against men like Charlie Kirk. People like you do not speak out against it when it is a minority of some sort or foreign person speaking a completely different language who is getting shot. You are just supporting the ideology you probably grew up believing, but you will never be exempt from the consequences of your own actions. It does not matter if Kirk was right or wrong in his sorry excuse for "debates" because that is not the point. Support policies that see your "enemy" get violence perpetrated against them, and you will probably be faced with that violence. It is always people who think they are excluded from the violent policies for which they vote who complain about the leopards eating their face after the fact, even though it was only supposed to attack the immigrants, the leftists, the global south, etc...
I think the motivation was pretty clear. The tranny loving faggot didn't like Charlie's stance on gender, homosexuality, immigration and all the usual talking points from conservatives. Charlie was pretty tame in his beliefs. He worked with fags and supported legal immigration. I call people like you delicate because you believe words are violence and want to be coddled like fucking babies. It's okay to be offended. If you need to protect your delicate sensibilities then change the channel, block them, start your own gay movement in protest. What you don't do is kill or physically harm a person because you disagree with WORDS.

And no I don't give a shit about violence against minorities because there's a fat chance it was done by another minority. I'd happily watch them destroy each other if it makes the country safer.

To call him innocent is a stretch. Is it because he is white and has a boyish face? This incident has been weaponised by the far right (yes, literal nazis), so while it is okay to feel bad for him, do not go white washing and sugar coating his net-negative effect on society and young impressionable persons.
It's really not a stretch and also you're a fucking pussy. The incident has not been weaponized, literally nothing has changed in the wake of his death. There were no riots or law changes unless you count antifa being labeled a terrorist organization which hasn't even been enforced. Charlie was a huge Israel shill and most far right people (nazis lol) didn't like Charlie because of this. Go back to Bluesky where you belong.
 
Seriously, the other guy is right. Obama is a centrist who stood for the same old hypermilitaristic global terrorism that has defined the US for several decades already. A Marxist would actually see that the country improve... even Russia was able to industrialise and build a legacy for itself with socialist ideals, and they were far from perfect. Why do you think every emerging communist party in developing nations gets sabotaged by the US eventually? China is the way it is (militarised) due in part to the US's aggression and stoking of dissent. The US is all abouy mutually assured disctruction. Like a stubborn hateful child, they would sooner see the world burn everyone than see everyone thrive because inequality is essential to upholding the class positions of the ruling and capitalist class. If you do not want to escape this hamster wheel of hate and defiance in which you're cycling, then fine, but that is not going to make the world make any more sense.
Are you fucking serious?Most Communist countries have gone to shit,and the ones who haven't,adopted capitalist economics because it works.Communist-Marxist in government,Capitalist in economy.That is how China got where it's at today.They understood this.The rest are trying to catch up(Communist-Marxist government run countries).Also,China has always been militarized,some part is US,but historically it's Taiwan,Russia,Vietnam.
 
Also,I'm not saying being a Communist run government is good.It just works for totalitarian governments.But the more successful ones use Capitalist economics.Communism to control the government-people,Capitalist for economy to make money
That's the thing... communist-run countries have failed because they were sabotaged. There are dozens of books about the lengths to which the US (in conjunction with other "western" countries like France, Germany, England, Japan, South Korea, etc.) have gone to ensure that communist uprisings do not end up being successful; my personal favourite is William Blum's Killing Hope. The only reason why Russia is what it is today, for example, is because it, for several decades, adopted socialist ideals which meant overruling their dictator/monarchy by force. They, like China, have had many successful 5 year plans, making more progress in a few decades than the US/UK have in hundreds of years in most industries. Modern-Day China is complicated and not totally morally upright, obviously. They relied on the exploitation of many of their own people to get to where they are today. Both China and Russia organised their governments very differently but ultimately had to do the same to protect themselves from infiltration by the English. This is why they have felt it necessary to develop their militaries to the degrees that they did. From Northern Africa to the Middle East to Southern Asia and then to South and Central America, there have been communist projects which were killed because people in power did not want them to live long enough to be successful. Still, some countries like Cuba are enduring, but this is not the norm. Most countries have been choked off by the world until they submit. The most popular method, other than flat out assassinating the communist leader who rose to power because they were what the people wanted (e.g. Ho Chi Minh, Fidel Castro, Huey Newton, Mao Zedong, Che Guavara, etc.), is forcing them to restructure their economies (after sabotaging their development) to operate more like capitalist ones. The richest countries in the world are so rich because they adopted socialist (remember, socialism is a transition *towards communism) policies in the 20th century. It is neoliberal policy which leads to the degeneration we see in much of the world, hence why the decline started in the 70s when neoliberalism as we know it was more or less conceived.
 
I think the motivation was pretty clear. The tranny loving faggot didn't like Charlie's stance on gender, homosexuality, immigration and all the usual talking points from conservatives. Charlie was pretty tame in his beliefs. He worked with fags and supported legal immigration. I call people like you delicate because you believe words are violence and want to be coddled like fucking babies. It's okay to be offended. If you need to protect your delicate sensibilities then change the channel, block them, start your own gay movement in protest. What you don't do is kill or physically harm a person because you disagree with WORDS.

And no I don't give a shit about violence against minorities because there's a fat chance it was done by another minority. I'd happily watch them destroy each other if it makes the country safer.

It's really not a stretch and also you're a fucking pussy. The incident has not been weaponized, literally nothing has changed in the wake of his death. There were no riots or law changes unless you count antifa being labeled a terrorist organization which hasn't even been enforced. Charlie was a huge Israel shill and most far right people (nazis lol) didn't like Charlie because of this. Go back to Bluesky where you belong.
Charlie was far from tame, but if that is what you think of his stances, then there is no helping you. Yeah yeah, I am so weak and small and oh so delicate, I get it. I mean, that is far from the truth. It is usually the people (like you, in this case) trying to emasculate their opponent who are in fact the delicate ones, but even that does not matter. I do not care if you are sensitive. This is not about offence. If I see nazi shit on the TV, then I cannot just turn it off and ignore it because it is indicative of deeper issues. That is what it is all about.

Okay, so you like to see destruction when it involves people not close in proximity or in relation to you. Got it. Now, you see, the problem with that way of running the world is that you are not exempt from the violence you perpetrate. If Joe supports the genocide in Gaza, for example, because it is cleansing Israel of a minority Joe hates, then fine. I mean, that is fucked up, but fine. Just don't be surprised when that miserable loathing of yours gets used to oppress you... unless you or your family is wealthy. In that case, you are more likely to get run down by the working class.

Great, so I am also a pussy. Mate, I got that the first time. It is just too bad that I am too secure in my own masculinity to fear being a pussy. Aw man! Anyway, if you do not think that it has been weaponised, then... what the fuck do you call politicians using his death as a justification for censorship? JFC. I do not know enough about Antifa to comment on whatever they are doing, so I will close on this: think about what you are saying. It is the far right who are so pathetic that they would censor anything they do not like. "nazis lol" yeah, so funny! Hilarious. 😒
 
^ you've almost perfectly described me to the younger males in my extended family, i'm a beacon to the old ways of thinking
ps - i can already tell that you're an imbecile, so go back under your rock
Why are you admitting to being so easily indoctrinated by this moron? Jeez. Don't be so hard on yourself. Even I have more faith in your ability to shut the fuck up and think about why socially conservative people are so miserable for a second. News flash: women are not to blame this time. You do not need to fear potentially being straight—no one cares.
 
liberal media and black activists do this..
Yeah, that is actually true, but it is not like they are the only people doing this. All media does because they are desperate for engagement and know that pissing people off will get them more of it. It is actually somewhat of a problem.
 
Charlie was far from tame, but if that is what you think of his stances, then there is no helping you. Yeah yeah, I am so weak and small and oh so delicate, I get it. I mean, that is far from the truth. It is usually the people (like you, in this case) trying to emasculate their opponent who are in fact the delicate ones, but even that does not matter. I do not care if you are sensitive. This is not about offence. If I see nazi shit on the TV, then I cannot just turn it off and ignore it because it is indicative of deeper issues. That is what it is all about.

Okay, so you like to see destruction when it involves people not close in proximity or in relation to you. Got it. Now, you see, the problem with that way of running the world is that you are not exempt from the violence you perpetrate. If Joe supports the genocide in Gaza, for example, because it is cleansing Israel of a minority Joe hates, then fine. I mean, that is fucked up, but fine. Just don't be surprised when that miserable loathing of yours gets used to oppress you... unless you or your family is wealthy. In that case, you are more likely to get run down by the working class.

Great, so I am also a pussy. Mate, I got that the first time. It is just too bad that I am too secure in my own masculinity to fear being a pussy. Aw man! Anyway, if you do not think that it has been weaponised, then... what the fuck do you call politicians using his death as a justification for censorship? JFC. I do not know enough about Antifa to comment on whatever they are doing, so I will close on this: think about what you are saying. It is the far right who are so pathetic that they would censor anything they do not like. "nazis lol" yeah, so funny! Hilarious. 😒
What controversial stance did he have? I guess you could argue that Christian beliefs are considered controversial in a secular society, but I would argue that straying from traditional values has caused more people to become radicalized. What Nazi shit have you seen on tv?? I need the name of your service provider, because all I'm seeing is a bunch of forced diversity, gay shit, and strong independent women denigrating men. Most white male characters are portrayed as villains.

The censorship thing was just the opportunistic Jews finding more ways to silence any dissent against them and I agree it's fucked up, but that's been going on forever.
 
Why are you admitting to being so easily indoctrinated by this moron? Jeez. Don't be so hard on yourself. Even I have more faith in your ability to shut the fuck up and think about why socially conservative people are so miserable for a second. News flash: women are not to blame this time. You do not need to fear potentially being straight—no one cares.
quiet stupid, no one asked for your opinion. Admit it, you're the moron.
 
That's the thing... communist-run countries have failed because they were sabotaged. There are dozens of books about the lengths to which the US (in conjunction with other "western" countries like France, Germany, England, Japan, South Korea, etc.) have gone to ensure that communist uprisings do not end up being successful; my personal favourite is William Blum's Killing Hope. The only reason why Russia is what it is today, for example, is because it, for several decades, adopted socialist ideals which meant overruling their dictator/monarchy by force. They, like China, have had many successful 5 year plans, making more progress in a few decades than the US/UK have in hundreds of years in most industries. Modern-Day China is complicated and not totally morally upright, obviously. They relied on the exploitation of many of their own people to get to where they are today. Both China and Russia organised their governments very differently but ultimately had to do the same to protect themselves from infiltration by the English. This is why they have felt it necessary to develop their militaries to the degrees that they did. From Northern Africa to the Middle East to Southern Asia and then to South and Central America, there have been communist projects which were killed because people in power did not want them to live long enough to be successful. Still, some countries like Cuba are enduring, but this is not the norm. Most countries have been choked off by the world until they submit. The most popular method, other than flat out assassinating the communist leader who rose to power because they were what the people wanted (e.g. Ho Chi Minh, Fidel Castro, Huey Newton, Mao Zedong, Che Guavara, etc.), is forcing them to restructure their economies (after sabotaging their development) to operate more like capitalist ones. The richest countries in the world are so rich because they adopted socialist (remember, socialism is a transition *towards communism) policies in the 20th century. It is neoliberal policy which leads to the degeneration we see in much of the world, hence why the decline started in the 70s when neoliberalism as we know it was more or less conceived.
^ paragraph breaks imbecile, not that anyone is reading that drivel anyway
Charlie was far from tame, but if that is what you think of his stances, then there is no helping you. Yeah yeah, I am so weak and small and oh so delicate, I get it. I mean, that is far from the truth. It is usually the people (like you, in this case) trying to emasculate their opponent who are in fact the delicate ones, but even that does not matter. I do not care if you are sensitive. This is not about offence. If I see nazi shit on the TV, then I cannot just turn it off and ignore it because it is indicative of deeper issues. That is what it is all about.

Okay, so you like to see destruction when it involves people not close in proximity or in relation to you. Got it. Now, you see, the problem with that way of running the world is that you are not exempt from the violence you perpetrate. If Joe supports the genocide in Gaza, for example, because it is cleansing Israel of a minority Joe hates, then fine. I mean, that is fucked up, but fine. Just don't be surprised when that miserable loathing of yours gets used to oppress you... unless you or your family is wealthy. In that case, you are more likely to get run down by the working class.

Great, so I am also a pussy. Mate, I got that the first time. It is just too bad that I am too secure in my own masculinity to fear being a pussy. Aw man! Anyway, if you do not think that it has been weaponised, then... what the fuck do you call politicians using his death as a justification for censorship? JFC. I do not know enough about Antifa to comment on whatever they are doing, so I will close on this: think about what you are saying. It is the far right who are so pathetic that they would censor anything they do not like. "nazis lol" yeah, so funny! Hilarious. 😒
^ tl;dr ... short version is redgrish is insane (even though you acquiesced with my paragraph idea)
 
^ paragraph breaks imbecile, not that anyone is reading that drivel anyway

^ tl;dr ... short version is redgrish is insane (even though you acquiesced with my paragraph idea)
Lmao,I read it only because I wanted to understand the response.Well,it's bullshit.Cuba is well off?Get the fuck outta here.5 year plans worked?What about The Great Leap Forward?Holodomor,Great Purges?All of them failed period.
 
Back
Top