GovTrack Is Deleting Senate Rankings For Kamala Harris

[deviant2]

Now why would they go and do that I wonder... Who sent down the order to delete information on her job performance while a senator?

She was ranked THE MOST LIBERAL out of ALL 100 Senators.

A read through shows she was a busy little beaver and not for the people.

-- She got the most cosponsors, yet held the fewest committee seats compared to Senate sophomores.
-- She introduced the second most bills and was ranked 2nd top leader compared to Senate sophomores.
-- She cosponsored the 8th most bills, and got influential cosponsors 13th out of ALL Senate sophomores.

YET... she was ranked 3rd MOST ABSENT compared to ALL Senators.
She missed 61.9% of votes in 2019.
(265 of 428 votes)

Kamala Harris’s 2019 legislative statistics.

Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators, and other 2019 legislative statistics

web.archive.org

__________________________________
2020 The MOST liberal of ALL senators and ranked 2nd MOST ABSENT out of ALL senators.
She missed 55.1% of votes (397 of 720 votes) in the 116th Congress.

Sen. Kamala Harris [D-CA, 2017-2021]’s 2020 legislative statistics.

Joined bipartisan bills the least often compared to Senate Democrats, and other 2020 legislative statistics

www.govtrack.us

 

[Fry_Swatter]

...I am so sick of her ass face on YouTube, no matter how many times you block or report them... There she is again...

...The fucking push for her is beyond disgusting...

...UK hookers with dangly she bits have more appeal than Cum Mullah...

 

[deviant2]

...I am so sick of her ass face on YouTube, no matter how many times you block or report them... There she is again...

...The fucking push for her is beyond disgusting...

...UK hookers with dangly she bits have more appeal than Cum Mullah...

I think she'll be replaced at the DNC. She isn't who they want sitting at the top. They're crooked sonofabitches, but they aren't dumb.
All Democrats should be livid at this hostile takeover of their primary votes, donations and volunteer efforts. They've just had their votes and rights stripped away and a candidate chosen for them. They're getting the shaft by their own party leaders and are too fucking stupid to see it.

_________________________________

A MUST READ:

Kamala Harris Owns The Biden Administration’s Record Of Undermining Election Integrity

Top Points:1. Federal Meddling in Elections: Kamala Harris, as Biden’s voting czar, has been instrumental in federal efforts to interfere with state election processes. This includes using taxpayer dollars, not appropriated by Congress, to promote voter registration and participation targeting...

www.pointreport.org

Her tenure has been marked by federal meddling in elections and persistent attacks on election integrity laws.

""Opposition to State Election Integrity Laws: Harris has vocally opposed state-level election integrity measures, such as Georgia’s Election Integrity Act of 2021, which includes voter ID requirements and regulations against “line warming.” She has falsely portrayed such laws as anti-voter and has used her platform to criticize these measures despite provisions that ensure voter access to necessities while waiting in line.**

 

[Russellmark11]

Now why would they go and do that I wonder... Who sent down the order to delete information on her job performance while a senator?

She was ranked THE MOST LIBERAL out of ALL 100 Senators.

A read through shows she was a busy little beaver and not for the people.

-- She got the most cosponsors, yet held the fewest committee seats compared to Senate sophomores.
-- She introduced the second most bills and was ranked 2nd top leader compared to Senate sophomores.
-- She cosponsored the 8th most bills, and got influential cosponsors 13th out of ALL Senate sophomores.

YET... she was ranked 3rd MOST ABSENT compared to ALL Senators.
She missed 61.9% of votes in 2019.
(265 of 428 votes)

Kamala Harris’s 2019 legislative statistics.

Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators, and other 2019 legislative statistics

web.archive.org

__________________________________
2020 The MOST liberal of ALL senators and ranked 2nd MOST ABSENT out of ALL senators.
She missed 55.1% of votes (397 of 720 votes) in the 116th Congress.

Sen. Kamala Harris [D-CA, 2017-2021]’s 2020 legislative statistics.

Joined bipartisan bills the least often compared to Senate Democrats, and other 2020 legislative statistics

www.govtrack.us

View attachment 804980

Isn't that because starting in January of 2019 she was running to be nominated in the democrats race for president?
Weren't there only 34 out of the 100 that were Senate sophomores in 2019?
Also wasnt Harris campaigning for Biden in 2020?
And woudnt this campaigning along with her living the 3rd fartherest from DC contribute to absences? Or should taxpayers have to pay so she could make these votes because taxpayers don't pay for her trips while she is campaigning but if she were to add a trip or two to DC to vote then those would be taxpayer funded plus they would pay for the plane trips back to the campaigning route?

I think she'll be replaced at the DNC. She isn't who they want sitting at the top. They're crooked sonofabitches, but they aren't dumb.
All Democrats should be livid at this hostile takeover of their primary votes, donations and volunteer efforts. They've just had their votes and rights stripped away and a candidate chosen for them. They're getting the shaft by their own party leaders and are too fucking stupid to see it.

_______________________________

View attachment 804998

Why are you posting a propagandist lie? This quote is from August 7, 2019. And it was from a satirical website that says everything on it is FICTIONAL.
The democrat party had the largest donations made in a single day than ever before when they announced that Harris was their leading candidate to run.

 

[rottenfresh]

I think she'll be replaced at the DNC. She isn't who they want sitting at the top. They're crooked sonofabitches, but they aren't dumb.
All Democrats should be livid at this hostile takeover of their primary votes, donations and volunteer efforts. They've just had their votes and rights stripped away and a candidate chosen for them. They're getting the shaft by their own party leaders and are too fucking stupid to see it.

_________________________________

A MUST READ:

Kamala Harris Owns The Biden Administration’s Record Of Undermining Election Integrity

Top Points:1. Federal Meddling in Elections: Kamala Harris, as Biden’s voting czar, has been instrumental in federal efforts to interfere with state election processes. This includes using taxpayer dollars, not appropriated by Congress, to promote voter registration and participation targeting...

www.pointreport.org

Her tenure has been marked by federal meddling in elections and persistent attacks on election integrity laws.

""Opposition to State Election Integrity Laws: Harris has vocally opposed state-level election integrity measures, such as Georgia’s Election Integrity Act of 2021, which includes voter ID requirements and regulations against “line warming.” She has falsely portrayed such laws as anti-voter and has used her platform to criticize these measures despite provisions that ensure voter access to necessities while waiting in line.**

View attachment 804998

She's trash. They're trying to say that Trump is afraid to debate her. She's a shit show lawyer and prosecutor . Trump can still out maneuver her . She couldn't carry her own Presidential campaign and she's certainly not ready for fucking primetime dealing with Trump.

 

[D.O.A.]

Isn't that because starting in January of 2019 she was running to be nominated in the democrats race for president?
Weren't there only 34 out of the 100 that were Senate sophomores in 2019?
Also wasnt Harris campaigning for Biden in 2020?
And woudnt this campaigning along with her living the 3rd fartherest from DC contribute to absences? Or should taxpayers have to pay so she could make these votes because taxpayers don't pay for her trips while she is campaigning but if she were to add a trip or two to DC to vote then those would be taxpayer funded plus they would pay for the plane trips back to the campaigning route?


Why are you posting a propagandist lie? This quote is from August 7, 2019. And it was from a satirical website that says everything on it is FICTIONAL.
The democrat party had the largest donations made in a single day than ever before when they announced that Harris was their leading candidate to run.

You'll vote for her because you're a fag, this we know

 

[deviant2]

She's trash. They're trying to say that Trump is afraid to debate her. She's a shit show lawyer and prosecutor . Trump can still out maneuver her . She couldn't carry her own Presidential campaign and she's certainly not ready for fucking primetime dealing with Trump.

Trump isn't afraid of anyone.

Her history is being deleted and rewritten as we speak. The cover up is on, from MSM to the web.

Straight from 1984: "Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right."

 

[rottenfresh]

Trump isn't afraid of anyone.

Her history is being deleted and rewritten as we speak. The cover up is on, from MSM to the web.

Straight from 1984: "Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right."

Sad but undoubtedly very true.

 

[Fry_Swatter]

I think she'll be replaced at the DNC. She isn't who they want sitting at the top. They're crooked sonofabitches, but they aren't dumb.
All Democrats should be livid at this hostile takeover of their primary votes, donations and volunteer efforts. They've just had their votes and rights stripped away and a candidate chosen for them. They're getting the shaft by their own party leaders and are too fucking stupid to see it.

_________________________________

A MUST READ:

Kamala Harris Owns The Biden Administration’s Record Of Undermining Election Integrity

Top Points:1. Federal Meddling in Elections: Kamala Harris, as Biden’s voting czar, has been instrumental in federal efforts to interfere with state election processes. This includes using taxpayer dollars, not appropriated by Congress, to promote voter registration and participation targeting...

www.pointreport.org

Her tenure has been marked by federal meddling in elections and persistent attacks on election integrity laws.

""Opposition to State Election Integrity Laws: Harris has vocally opposed state-level election integrity measures, such as Georgia’s Election Integrity Act of 2021, which includes voter ID requirements and regulations against “line warming.” She has falsely portrayed such laws as anti-voter and has used her platform to criticize these measures despite provisions that ensure voter access to necessities while waiting in line.**

View attachment 804998

... Everyone the Democrats put up for candidacy, had a sick past...

...We as a nation need to stop playing their game...

 

[deviant2]

Sad but undoubtedly very true.

No undoubtedly about it.
Example # 1

Example # 2 happens to go with the thread topic specifically.

That statement is no longer present on the govtrack page pertaining to Harris. They deleted it.
_____________________________

... Everyone the Democrats put up for candidacy, had a sick past...

...We as a nation need to stop playing their game...

That time is coming, won't be long.
Just hang in there.

 

[rottenfresh]

No undoubtedly about it.
Example:
View attachment 805014View attachment 805016View attachment 805017


Example # 2 happens to go with the thread topic specifically.
View attachment 805018
That statement is no longer present on the govtrack page pertaining to Harris. They deleted it.


That time is coming, won't be long.
Just hang in there.

Kamala is not going to do well at all. She had to step on a lot of people to get where the fuck she is and those people won't forget. They're really just fluffing her up. Nobody really likes the cunt.

 

[deviant2]

I rather think she's the one doing the fluffing.

 

[Chief Queef]

This strumpet is not burdened by what has been...

 

[Russellmark11]

You'll vote for her because you're a fag, this we know

Voting is for the stupid. I have never voted in my life.

Kamala is not going to do well at all. She had to step on a lot of people to get where the fuck she is and those people won't forget. They're really just fluffing her up. Nobody really likes the cunt.

That doesn't matter in elections. Only 6% of voters don't vote for their party's nominee.

 

[deviant2]

Voting is for the stupid. I have never voted in my life.


That doesn't matter in elections. Only 6% of voters don't vote for their party's nominee.

Where do you get your numbers? You don't vote but you cheerlead for the sitting administration and spout off percentages and polls and pie chart jargon plenty. Only problem is you never post any articles or official statements to go with your "information". That renders everything you say, hogwash.

All of this for example...

Isn't that because starting in January of 2019 she was running to be nominated in the democrats race for president?
Weren't there only 34 out of the 100 that were Senate sophomores in 2019?
Also wasnt Harris campaigning for Biden in 2020?
And woudnt this campaigning along with her living the 3rd fartherest from DC contribute to absences? Or should taxpayers have to pay so she could make these votes because taxpayers don't pay for her trips while she is campaigning but if she were to add a trip or two to DC to vote then those would be taxpayer funded plus they would pay for the plane trips back to the campaigning route?

Got receipts?

I posted what was on govtracker for their stats, parts of which they did in fact delete. I posted the same for Axio, proof.

You instead of talking about blatant censorship, spew a bunch of blah, blah, blah number number number, with some didn't theys and wouldn't this bullshit. You have a problem with the stats, take it up with govtracker.

For my being a propagandist... I'm entitled to speak my opinion, far as I know it's still one of my rights.
You don't like the meme, tough shit.
If it's fake, so what. You leftists cucks been blowing on about Trump and project 25, right? What's good for the goose and all...

 

[Christopher Hitchens]

The most absent in 2019 and 2020 when she was running president and vice president. Like how the fuck is that a sharp point. No shit she was. Also I am glad she is on the left because I am so I agree more with her than Trump. That’s no really a knock against her unless you are on the right but if you are on the right you aren’t going to vote for the Democrat no matter what.

 

[slickrick27]

Yea I heard that today on the news. They obviously got paid off.

 

[SJW-Snowflake❄️]

Now why would they go and do that I wonder... Who sent down the order to delete information on her job performance while a senator?

She was ranked THE MOST LIBERAL out of ALL 100 Senators.

A read through shows she was a busy little beaver and not for the people.

-- She got the most cosponsors, yet held the fewest committee seats compared to Senate sophomores.
-- She introduced the second most bills and was ranked 2nd top leader compared to Senate sophomores.
-- She cosponsored the 8th most bills, and got influential cosponsors 13th out of ALL Senate sophomores.

YET... she was ranked 3rd MOST ABSENT compared to ALL Senators.
She missed 61.9% of votes in 2019.
(265 of 428 votes)

Kamala Harris’s 2019 legislative statistics.

Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators, and other 2019 legislative statistics

web.archive.org

__________________________________
2020 The MOST liberal of ALL senators and ranked 2nd MOST ABSENT out of ALL senators.
She missed 55.1% of votes (397 of 720 votes) in the 116th Congress.

Sen. Kamala Harris [D-CA, 2017-2021]’s 2020 legislative statistics.

Joined bipartisan bills the least often compared to Senate Democrats, and other 2020 legislative statistics

www.govtrack.us

View attachment 804980

Get used to it bitch, that's the next President there. 💋

View attachment 805024
View attachment 805026

As if you give a fuck about slave labour. Bahahahahahaaaaaaaa. Hypocritical cunt.

 

[Russellmark11]

Where do you get your numbers? You don't vote but you cheerlead for the sitting administration and spout off percentages and polls and pie chart jargon plenty. Only problem is you never post any articles or official statements to go with your "information". That renders everything you say, hogwash.

All of this for example...

Isn't that because starting in January of 2019 she was running to be nominated in the democrats race for president?
Weren't there only 34 out of the 100 that were Senate sophomores in 2019?
Also wasnt Harris campaigning for Biden in 2020?
And woudnt this campaigning along with her living the 3rd fartherest from DC contribute to absences? Or should taxpayers have to pay so she could make these votes because taxpayers don't pay for her trips while she is campaigning but if she were to add a trip or two to DC to vote then those would be taxpayer funded plus they would pay for the plane trips back to the campaigning route?

Got receipts?

I posted what was on govtracker for their stats, parts of which they did in fact delete. I posted the same for Axio, proof.

You instead of talking about blatant censorship, spew a bunch of blah, blah, blah number number number, with some didn't theys and wouldn't this bullshit. You have a problem with the stats, take it up with govtracker.

For my being a propagandist... I'm entitled to speak my opinion, far as I know it's still one of my rights.
You don't like the meme, tough shit.
If it's fake, so what. You leftists cucks been blowing on about Trump and project 25, right? What's good for the goose and all...

View attachment 805024
View attachment 805026

I'm not cheerleading for anyone. I'm only stating facts and asking questions that you apparently have not considered in your assumption. The percentages have been documented in the election cycles since Kennedy was elected and Pewresearch publishes the findings which range from 4-6% and is a factor determined mostly by the younger voters.
The same way they use demographics in predicting future elections which as of today favor Democrats until at least 2036. One of the reasons is that the largest demographic percentage of Republican voters(white people over 65) is shrinking and will continue to shrink. In fact, they are pretty much shrinking in all demographics except for the white non-college voters but in order to make them a factor their voting turnout has to increase by 10%.
The one thing that all the future models are able to prove with over a 90% certainty is that a Republican will never be able to win the popular vote again and the only way for a Republican to be elected president will be by the electoral college.

Here's the trend surveys for one: American Trends Panel (ATP) surveys included in the report
An article about it. Straight-Ticket Voting Took Another Big Leap in 2020
States that allow straight ticket voting:

Straight Ticket Voting

A summary of states that offer a straight-ticket or straight-party option on ballots.

www.ncsl.org

Evidence for it:

https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/688677?journalCode=jop

How voting ballots balance design determines this:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0261379413001649

The politics of ballot choice study.

https://kb.osu.edu/items/139da0f5-e02a-5f8c-90ba-938ea934b552

How demographics determine voting along party lines.
America’s Electoral Future

Need anymore? I'm an avid researcher because I don't like to be thought of as not knowledged in what I'm discussing.

Where do you get your numbers? You don't vote but you cheerlead for the sitting administration and spout off percentages and polls and pie chart jargon plenty. Only problem is you never post any articles or official statements to go with your "information". That renders everything you say, hogwash.

All of this for example...

Isn't that because starting in January of 2019 she was running to be nominated in the democrats race for president?
Weren't there only 34 out of the 100 that were Senate sophomores in 2019?
Also wasnt Harris campaigning for Biden in 2020?
And woudnt this campaigning along with her living the 3rd fartherest from DC contribute to absences? Or should taxpayers have to pay so she could make these votes because taxpayers don't pay for her trips while she is campaigning but if she were to add a trip or two to DC to vote then those would be taxpayer funded plus they would pay for the plane trips back to the campaigning route?

Got receipts?

I posted what was on govtracker for their stats, parts of which they did in fact delete. I posted the same for Axio, proof.

You instead of talking about blatant censorship, spew a bunch of blah, blah, blah number number number, with some didn't theys and wouldn't this bullshit. You have a problem with the stats, take it up with govtracker.

For my being a propagandist... I'm entitled to speak my opinion, far as I know it's still one of my rights.
You don't like the meme, tough shit.
If it's fake, so what. You leftists cucks been blowing on about Trump and project 25, right? What's good for the goose and all...

View attachment 805024
View attachment 805026

Second: Why would I need "receipts" for asking questions? Those are for you to be able to answer with receipts since you are the one who opened this forum for a discussion. By doing this one assumes that you would have the answers for these questions since they are detrimental to the conclusion you are positing. If you agree that the questions can be answered with a yes she did do that or those are the correct numbers I state in my questions then you would need to change your conclusion with those questions addressed in order to validate your original conclusion.

 

[deviant2]

Get used to it bitch, that's the next President there. 💋

As if you give a fuck about slave labour. Bahahahahahaaaaaaaa. Hypocritical cunt.

Wth? lmao... calm down there zippy.

Doesn't matter if I give a fuck about slave labour or not, I'm sure those men she held in jail past their release dates give a fuck though.
One would think even dems want someone with at least a little integrity, of which she has none.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/21/us/bail-reform-bail-charities-invs/index.html

"Celebrities such as Justin Timberlake, Seth Rogen and Vice President Kamala Harris touted the Minnesota Freedom Fund and other bail charities on Twitter. Donations poured in. Many charities experienced a surge, but none as jarring as the one that jolted the Minnesota Freedom Fund."

I'm not cheerleading for anyone. I'm only stating facts and asking questions that you apparently have not considered in your assumption. The percentages have been documented in the election cycles since Kennedy was elected and Pewresearch publishes the findings which range from 4-6% and is a factor determined mostly by the younger voters.
The same way they use demographics in predicting future elections which as of today favor Democrats until at least 2036. One of the reasons is that the largest demographic percentage of Republican voters(white people over 65) is shrinking and will continue to shrink. In fact, they are pretty much shrinking in all demographics except for the white non-college voters but in order to make them a factor their voting turnout has to increase by 10%.
The one thing that all the future models are able to prove with over a 90% certainty is that a Republican will never be able to win the popular vote again and the only way for a Republican to be elected president will be by the electoral college.

Here's the trend surveys for one: American Trends Panel (ATP) surveys included in the report
An article about it. Straight-Ticket Voting Took Another Big Leap in 2020
States that allow straight ticket voting:

Straight Ticket Voting

A summary of states that offer a straight-ticket or straight-party option on ballots.

www.ncsl.org

Evidence for it:

https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/688677?journalCode=jop

How voting ballots balance design determines this:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0261379413001649

The politics of ballot choice study.

https://kb.osu.edu/items/139da0f5-e02a-5f8c-90ba-938ea934b552

How demographics determine voting along party lines.
America’s Electoral Future

Need anymore? I'm an avid researcher because I don't like to be thought of as not knowledged in what I'm discussing.


Second: Why would I need "receipts" for asking questions? Those are for you to be able to answer with receipts since you are the one who opened this forum for a discussion. By doing this one assumes that you would have the answers for these questions since they are detrimental to the conclusion you are positing. If you agree that the questions can be answered with a yes she did do that or those are the correct numbers I state in my questions then you would need to change your conclusion with those questions addressed in order to validate your original conclusion.

You're also an avid whiny tit and you should research more.