Lasers reveal ruins of 5th-century fortress in Spanish forest (1 Viewer)

Users who are viewing this thread

Cold Ethyl

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
Laser scans have revealed that what was thought to be an Iron Age hillfort in northwestern Spain is, in fact, an early medieval stronghold built in the fifth century A.D. and occupied for the next 200 years.
Archaeologists in Spain got the surprise of a lifetime when they discovered the ruins of a powerful fifth-century fortress surrounded by a huge defensive wall in a dense forest, instead of the Iron Age fort they had been looking for, they reported in a new study.

The team found the stronghold on a hilltop in northwestern Spain by using lidar — light detection and ranging — to peer beneath a forest covering the ruins. This technique, which bounces hundreds of thousands of laser pulses every second off the landscape from an aircraft flying overhead, revealed an early medieval fortress covering about 25 acres (10 hectares), with 30 towers and a defensive wall about three-quarters of a mile (1.2 kilometers) long. The fortress seems to have been built in the first half of the fifth century A.D., possibly on top of an earlier Iron Age hilltop fort, to defend against Germanic invaders after Roman control of the region had collapsed, study author Mário Fernández-Pereiro(opens in new tab), an archaeologist at University College London and the University of Santiago de Compostela (USC), told Live Science.


The site, called Castro Valente ("Brave Fort"), is in the Galicia region's Padrón district, about 16 miles (16 km) southwest of the city of Santiago de Compostela.

Locals thought Castro Valente had been built after the about ninth century B.C. by a Celtic people, called the "Callaeci" in Latin, who lived in Galicia at that time. Another Celtic tribe, called the Astures, lived to the east in what's now the Spanish region of Asturias, while others, called the Lusitani, lived to the south in what's now Portugal.

Until they were subsumed by the expanding Roman Empire in the first century B.C., the Callaeci and the Astures formed the "Castro culture" of fortified hilltop settlements — and modern-day Galicia is filled with their ruins, according to the December 2022 study, published in Cuadernos de Arqueología de la Universidad de Navarra(opens in new tab) (Archaeological Journal of the University of Navarra).


When Fernández-Pereiro and José Carlos Sánchez-Pardo(opens in new tab), also a USC archaeologist and co-author of the study, began researching the site, they also thought Castro Valente was a fortified Celtic settlement. But they soon found evidence that the buried structure was much larger than they expected and that parts of it were built with methods not used in the Iron Age. The archaeological excavations "continued to provide data that point us towards a time of post-Roman occupation, presumably in the first half of the 5th century," Fernánandez-Pereiro said in an email.

The fortress’s layout, construction and fragments of pottery found there suggest it was built after the Roman Empire lost control of the region in about the early fifth century A.D., when Spain was overrun by Germanic invaders. Galicia fell to the Suevi people (also spelled Suebi), who originated in the Elbe River region of what's now Germany and the Czech Republic, and the fortress seems to have been built by local people for their defense at that time, Fernández-Pereiro said

We understand that the local powers of Galicia needed a tool to reaffirm and control the territory in the midst of this transition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages," he said.


But the fortress seems to have been abandoned roughly 200 years later, possibly because it was no longer needed, Fernández-Pereiro said. Future research may reveal more about it, as well as protect it from development, such as forest roads and wind farms. The team plans to regularly update their Facebook page, CastelosnoAire(opens in new tab), as research progresses.

Ken Dark(opens in new tab), an archaeologist at King's College London who wasn't involved in the study, told Live Science that the fifth-century Castro Valente site seemed to be based on the reuse of a Celtic fort — something that was also seen in Britain after the collapse of Roman rule

In the fifth and sixth centuries A.D., many Britons from what are now Wales and Cornwall fled the Anglo-Saxon invasion by immigrating to Galicia, alongside the more famous migration of Britons to what's now known as Brittany in western France, he said.


"It is fascinating to find a site like this in a region strongly associated with Britain during Late Antiquity," Dark said.

Screenshot_20230211-105332_Chrome.jpg
Screenshot_20230211-105429_Chrome.jpg
Screenshot_20230211-105402_Chrome.jpg


 

McM

ARSELING
Galicia is a nice place in Spain. Wild quiet coast directly at the open Atlantic.
I remember we also visited a rebuilt village in an archeological site from the same era the post mentioned.
 

Tattooedmaniac

Why so serious? The Devil ate my bannana
Great post it is interesting, But this picture does not sit right with me. I went to the site where you got it and I checked out the larger one, I think this has been photoshopped. That stone sitting there does not look in place if it has been there a while it would have moss on it like the others beneath it. And i have never seen carvings in a stone that are so visible, especially given that it is from the "5th century". and the plant hanging down in the middle at the top looks out of place. The stone looks too new too light and its edges do not fit in the picture it looks fake completely. I mean tell me if I am wrong but i spend a while around online images but i could be.
stone.jpg


@Cold Ethyl here you go some more information for your post......



Castelos no aire
 
Last edited:

Grand Mal Caesar

1984+Idiocracy=Reality
Great post it is interesting, But this picture does not sit right with me. I went to the site where you got it and I checked out the larger one, I think this has been photoshopped. That stone sitting there does not look in place if it has been there a while it would have moss on it like the others beneath it. And i have never seen carvings in a stone that are so visible, especially given that it is from the "5th century". and the plant hanging down in the middle at the top looks out of place. The stone looks too new too light and its edges do not fit in the picture it looks fake completely. I mean tell me if I am wrong but i spend a while around online images but i could be.
View attachment 657748

@Cold Ethyl here you go some more information for your post......



Castelos no aire


I found a couple different images of this inscribed stone in the links below. The best I can sort from the articles is that it was placed much later than the 5th Century. 1705 maybe? As far as I can tell, it is the same stone. But, it's at two different sites. One image is from 1935. The other from 2012.

I don't know Spanish and the translations from google are crap. I'm too tired do anything else with it now. You got me curious about it and had to poke around a bit.

 

Tattooedmaniac

Why so serious? The Devil ate my bannana
I found a couple different images of this inscribed stone in the links below. The best I can sort from the articles is that it was placed much later than the 5th Century. 1705 maybe? As far as I can tell, it is the same stone. But, it's at two different sites. One image is from 1935. The other from 2012.

I don't know Spanish and the translations from google are crap. I'm too tired do anything else with it now. You got me curious about it and had to poke around a bit.

Cool thanks for clarifying
 
Back
Top