My money is on cyclical solar radiation highs and reduced volcanic activity causing ice reduction. Nothing strange or worrisome about that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.
We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.
We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.
Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.
We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.
By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.
just what i was thinking ... actually, i usually simplify difficult ideas in my brain to "it's magic"My money is on cyclical solar radiation highs and reduced volcanic activity causing ice reduction. Nothing strange or worrisome about that.
I know about those effects, they’re real and contribute to climate change over hundreds of thousands or even millions of years.I don't know about magnetic Poles reversing, but they do move slowly over time. What I think would answer your question lies in the following.
Milankovitch Cycles: These are long-term, cyclical changes in Earth's orbit and axial tilt that influence the amount of solar energy received at different latitudes and seasons.
Eccentricity: The shape of Earth's orbit varies over long periods, affecting the amount of sunlight received throughout the year.
Obliquity: The tilt of Earth's axis changes, which influences the intensity of the seasons.
Precession: The wobble of Earth's axis affects when each season occurs in relation to the orbit's position.
Still waiting on those rising sea levels.I know about those effects, they’re real and contribute to climate change over hundreds of thousands or even millions of years.
But the climate change since the Industrial Revolution has been ridiculously fast in geological terms. There’s volumes of evidence and theory showing that it’s human-caused.
I know, LETS ASK MERLIN!!!That doesn't answer my question. Magnetic pole reversals don't affect climate change (fact).
8-10 inches is the average sea rise since 1900.Still waiting on those rising sea levels.
View attachment 927976
View attachment 927977
View attachment 927978
Could you fit Grim in sometime this week? He needs more SCHOOLINGI don't know about magnetic Poles reversing, but they do move slowly over time. What I think would answer your question lies in the following.
Milankovitch Cycles: These are long-term, cyclical changes in Earth's orbit and axial tilt that influence the amount of solar energy received at different latitudes and seasons.
Eccentricity: The shape of Earth's orbit varies over long periods, affecting the amount of sunlight received throughout the year.
Obliquity: The tilt of Earth's axis changes, which influences the intensity of the seasons.
Precession: The wobble of Earth's axis affects when each season occurs in relation to the orbit's position.
I don't believe in that shit. Why? Because the studies are being faked to push a political agenda. End of story.8-10 inches is the average sea rise since 1900.
That's nothing and will not appear in a landscape view photograph. Plus, it's an average, the ocean rises unevenly across the globe.
I was talking about the cause of climate change, not its prospective effects.
Eugenics To Pandemics, its been done several timescould this be a bill gates foundation thing? with his engineered mosquitoes...
I can dismantle that position but I don't think you are interested. End of story it is, then.I don't believe in that shit. Why? Because the studies are being faked to push a political agenda. End of story.
Claiming you can dismantle a position in not the same as actually dismantling it. Let’s just say that no internet argument has ever successfully changed what someone believes, and leave it at that.I can dismantle that position but I don't think you are interested. End of story it is, then.
Of course, and I didn't do it because you're not interested, but I could. (Ask @K.I.T.T. ).Claiming you can dismantle a position in not the same as actually dismantling it. Let’s just say that no internet argument has ever successfully changed what someone believes, and leave it at that.
So what argument with Kitt did you win?Of course, and I didn't do it because you're not interested, but I could. (Ask @K.I.T.T. ).
Agree to disagree is the best option when the other party isn't interested.
Every argument. I'm assuming you're not interested in any of this. My original back-and-forth was with teeshine, not you.So what argument with Kitt did you win?
@K.I.T.T. Do you agree with the above?Every argument. I'm assuming you're not interested in any of this. My original back-and-forth was with teeshine, not you.
You seem interested now.@K.I.T.T. Do you agree with the above?
OK. Tell me how much the average temperature has risen over the past 100 years, and is this everywhere or just at particular places?You seem interested now.
Grimhelm did indeed win an argument. I thought he was straight, but he insisted he's a flaming faggot femboy bottom bitch that happily sucked a nigger dick in the bowling alley restroom just to get a discount on the rental shoes.@K.I.T.T. Do you agree with the above?