• Adults Only Website 18+

    If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.

    We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.

    We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.

    Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.

    We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.

    By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.

Tomb Doesn't Contain Remains of Alexander the Greats Father But Those of An Unknown Man

Famous tomb said to hold Alexander the Great's father actually contains
younger man, a woman and 6 babies

May 12 2025

An ancient tomb in Greece does not hold the remains of Philip II, the father of Alexander the Great, as some scholars think it does, a new study suggests. Instead, it contains the remains of a younger man who died before Philip II did, archaeologists propose.

Alexander the Great.webp


The study, published in the July 2025 issue of the Journal of Archaeological Science, also revealed that the tomb is the burial place of a young woman and six infants. Prior to this study researchers knew of the existence of the man, woman and at least one infant in the tomb.

Archaeologists have long scrutinized the tomb, which was discovered in 1977 at the site of Vergina (also called Aigai), in northern Greece. Known as "Tomb I," it is located beneath a large tumulus (burial mound) that has a shrine on top. It's near several other tombs, which are thought to hold other members of Alexander the Great's family.

Given that Tomb I has no doorway and was sealed off in ancient times, it's likely that the man and woman were buried together, at the same time, the researchers noted. Radiocarbon dating of their remains indicates that the man and woman lived sometime between 388 and 356 B.C., the researchers wrote in the paper.

An analysis of their bones and teeth suggested that the man in the tomb was between 25 and 35 years old at the time of his death. Philip II, in comparison, was assassinated in 336 B.C., at about age 46. This suggests that the man buried in Tomb I is not Philip II, the researchers wrote in their paper.

The researchers also used radiocarbon dating to find that at least six infants were placed in the tomb sometime between 150 B.C. and A.D. 130, at a time when the Roman Republic or Roman Empire controlled the region. The dates mean that the infants are likely not related to the man or woman, the researchers wrote.

"There is evidence that disposing dead infants in old tombs, wells or underground voids is not an uncommon practice in the Roman period," study lead researcher Yannis Maniatis, a researcher at the laboratory of archaeometry, of the National Center of Scientific Research Demokritos in Greece, told Live Science in an email.

Maniatis said the team is not certain where Philip II is buried. Many scholars have suggested that Tomb II at Vergina holds his cremated remains. Previous research done by other scholars has shown that Tomb II is a "two-chamber vaulted tomb found unlooted, with all the grave goods intact, containing the cremated remains of a male" who was around 44 years old when he died, Maniatis noted.

The man likely spent his childhood away from the Macedonian capital of Pella, which is about 20 miles (32 kilometers) northeast of Vergina, the isotopic tests revealed. The woman — who died between the ages of 18 and 25, according to an anatomical analysis — likely spent her childhood living in or near Pella. Although their identities remain unknown, the tomb's opulence indicates that they were elite.

"We assume that he must be a Macedon King who ruled and died decades before Philip II's assassination," Maniatis said. It's unclear which king that was, but candidates include Alexander II (reigned circa 370 to 368 B.C.) and Perdiccas III (reigned from 365 to 359 B.C.), the team wrote in the study. Both rulers had tumultuous reigns that dealt with war and infighting within the ancient kingdom of Macedon.

Antonis Bartsiokas, a professor emeritus of physical anthropology and paleoanthropology at the Democritus University of Thrace and one of the researchers who has suggested Philip II is buried in Tomb I, told Live Science that he and other supporters of this theory will reply in a journal article of their own and don't want to comment further at this time.

"We are going to answer first to the journal," Bartsiokas told Live Science in an email. Source
 
Conclusion... he was a faggot like you... yet professionally successful.
Death, simple shot to the dome, then the trash pile, for ALL FAGGOTS. IT SHOUOLD BE AN INSTANT DEATH SENTENCE. That would be natural order. But the freaks have infested the law. Well remedy this sooner or later. Sooner I hope.
 
This guy died after he was injured at Jhelum in Kashmir by Porus (anglicized from Purusha meaning "The Man" in sanskrit literally).

The actual name of the king is lost in antiquity but we in India can tell that he was probably one of the kings ruling the smaller states on the periphery of India.

"The Man" lost but broke Alexander's will to go on even deeper by attacking the man's heartstrings. We have a story in the oral tradition about Alexander's victory over Porus.

It goes so,

"After Alexander won, he asked the opposing King be brought before him. He was brought before Alexander, broken, blinded, and grievously injured. Alexander asked him, how should we treat you? Porus replied , As befits a King another King! in amazement at the mlechha's ignorance. Over this incredible mortal insult Alexander was reminded of the virtue of masculinity and was spiritually trounced having encountered Dharma and returned Porus his Kingdom, and turned tail honorably vowing not to penetrate further into India." (Disclaimer : truncated, subjective, made up probably, but has a seed of truth)



India would have to wait another 2000 years before she was conquered. first partially by the Islamists in the north who were somewhat honorable and stuck to rape,pillage, and forced conversion to Islam.

The Judeo-Christians of the East India Company though were a totally different animal and completely bodied and flummoxed the little Hindu that was left in the Hindus of India and corroded his Indianness to such an extent that it fractured and became easy to assimilate.

I like to think , Alexander would have cried.
 
Some video evidence of Frogman Alexander fighting Stephen Chow Porus



Spiritual victory
 
I'm not gonna lie to you. I am high as f*** right now so I don't know what's going on. There was a bunch of words that I chose not to read. Because I'm having a fall on panic attack. My ceiling fan is dropping. Little black ninjas all over my room and I can't seem to shake them. Never mix party drugs.
Okay, I am fully recovered. Sorry about that.
 
I'm not gonna lie to you. I am high as f*** right now so I don't know what's going on. There was a bunch of words that I chose not to read. Because I'm having a fall on panic attack. My ceiling fan is dropping. Little black ninjas all over my room and I can't seem to shake them. Never mix party drugs.

Okay, I am fully recovered. Sorry about that.
if you're quoting yourself again, you're not fully recovered...but since you apologized, i'll forgive you this time
 
Back
Top