German knifeman attacks two muslims in Munich-Pasing

[usupari]

In Munich-Pasing a 40 year old German, attacked two Muslims in the streets, one of whom was returning from the Mosque.
After arrest he screamed racist slurs and also "Allahu akbar". Munich Police said that he was probably a psycho, with a history of mental illness.

As most reports on thos topic are in German, I will post this link:

Knife attack in Munich: Killer wanted to kill Muslims!

Following the knife attack in Munich-Pasing, more and more details are becoming known. Gunman Werner P. (40) allegedly told police officers that he wanted to ki

ground.news

 

[Interregnum]

religion has long become outdated and now serves only to poison our coexistence. it divides people, creating an "us versus them" mentality. everyone believes themselves to be superior, yet they fail to see that they are all fundamentally the same

following the rules of your religion does not automatically make you a good person, just as simply following my own principles does not inherently confer goodness. but such individuals, caught in their illusion of faith, believe they have the authority to interpret moral truth.

im telling you noobs
life is faaaar too complex to be reduced to a single religious doctrine

 

[Deleted User 201666]

Shame it was only the two

 

[slickrick27]

religion has long become outdated and now serves only to poison our coexistence. it divides people, creating an "us versus them" mentality. everyone believes themselves to be superior, yet they fail to see that they are all fundamentally the same

following the rules of your religion does not automatically make you a good person, just as simply following my own principles does not inherently confer goodness. but such individuals, caught in their illusion of faith, believe they have the authority to interpret moral truth.

im telling you noobs
life is faaaar too complex to be reduced to a single religious doctrine

I can't speak for all religions. But I can speak for myself and say it's not definitely not me vers anyone. I've been surprised to see atheist and "sinners" show me more respect and loyalty than "christians". Anyone can claim anything they want.
Anyone can put any label they want on themselves and say I'm this or I'm that. Most people don't even practice the religion they claim to be.
It doesn't cost anything and someone doesn't even have to pass a test to say they are Muslim or Christian or Buddhist or whatever.
We can tell what kind of person someone is by their actions.

 

[Interregnum]

I can't speak for all religions. But I can speak for myself and say it's not definitely not me vers anyone. I've been surprised to see atheist and "sinners" show me more respect and loyalty than "christians". Anyone can claim anything they want.
Anyone can put any label they want on themselves and say I'm this or I'm that. Most people don't even practice the religion they claim to be.
It doesn't cost anything and someone doesn't even have to pass a test to say they are Muslim or Christian or Buddhist or whatever.
We can tell what kind of person someone is by their actions.

do you believe that there is a god, or do you know it? if you think you know it because you claim to see evidence, do you then think that other people are blind or not as smart as you because they cant recognize the evidence?

 

[Super Kirbo]

About time someone gave them a taste for once

 

[45cal1911]

religion has long become outdated and now serves only to poison our coexistence. it divides people, creating an "us versus them" mentality. everyone believes themselves to be superior, yet they fail to see that they are all fundamentally the same

following the rules of your religion does not automatically make you a good person, just as simply following my own principles does not inherently confer goodness. but such individuals, caught in their illusion of faith, believe they have the authority to interpret moral truth.

im telling you noobs
life is faaaar too complex to be reduced to a single religious doctrine

Interesting. Define your "moral point" of view.

 

[slickrick27]

do you believe that there is a god, or do you know it? if you think you know it because you claim to see evidence, do you then think that other people are blind or not as smart as you because they cant recognize the evidence?

It's not so much a matter of the actual evidence, then how people interpret it. 2 people can see the same exact thing and have 2 completely different opinions. Look at the democrats and Republicans. They both witness the same events all around the world but each have their own views and opinions about it.
That's why juries get deadlocked because 5 might see it one way and 7 they other way.

Even data and science and mathematical formulas are proven wrong over time as we learn more about the earth and the universe.

 

[Nezzi]

Allah Ackbar!

 

[Interregnum]

Interesting. Define your "moral point" of view.

moral values and norms are not static they evolve in response to social, cultural, technological, and economic changes. but a supposedly divine book is not adaptable because it doesnt change. book is book

It's not so much a matter of the actual evidence, then how people interpret it. 2 people can see the same exact thing and have 2 completely different opinions. Look at the democrats and Republicans. They both witness the same events all around the world but each have their own views and opinions about it.
That's why juries get deadlocked because 5 might see it one way and 7 they other way.

Even data and science and mathematical formulas are proven wrong over time as we learn more about the earth and the universe.

lol this means that everyone can be either right or wrong

 

[45cal1911]

moral values and norms are not static they evolve in response to social, cultural, technological, and economic changes. but a supposedly divine book is not adaptable because it doesnt change. book is book

lol this means that everyone can be either right or wrong

I concur but you never answered my question.

Your own moral values.

We all adapt to circumstances but moral values should still remain.

 

[slickrick27]

moral values and norms are not static they evolve in response to social, cultural, technological, and economic changes. but a supposedly divine book is not adaptable because it doesnt change. book is book

lol this means that everyone can be either right or wrong

Moral values and norms don't really change. We just learn how to make technology and today's society adapt to it.

The same principles in the Bible from 2,000 years ago are primarily the same today. Don't kill ,don't steal, don't fuck your neighbors wife, etc. Just the consequences of doing these things has changed.

Everyone can't be right, so someone's wrong obviously, I obviously interpret the evidence in this matter. You can look at it and interpret the way you see fit. We both can't be right, so either one of us is wrong or we're both wrong.
I'm not willing to gamble eternity on it. If Jesus isn't real and the Bible isn't true, big deal then when I die I'm just dead. And there's nothing to worry about. If He's real and the Bible is true then I made the best decision of my life. So I win either way.
Cuz the way I see it is life is better when i listen to the Bible and God's advice and not the other way around.

 

[Interregnum]

I concur but you never answered my question.

Your own moral values.

We all adapt to circumstances but moral values should still remain.

i share the moral outlook of the broader society

Moral values and norms don't really change. We just learn how to make technology and today's society adapt to it.

The same principles in the Bible from 2,000 years ago are primarily the same today. Don't kill ,don't steal, don't fuck your neighbors wife, etc. Just the consequences of doing these things has changed.

Everyone can't be right, so someone's wrong obviously, I obviously interpret the evidence in this matter. You can look at it and interpret the way you see fit. We both can't be right, so either one of us is wrong or we're both wrong.
I'm not willing to gamble eternity on it. If Jesus isn't real and the Bible isn't true, big deal then when I die I'm just dead. And there's nothing to worry about. If He's real and the Bible is true then I made the best decision of my life. So I win either way.
Cuz the way I see it is life is better when i listen to the Bible and God's advice and not the other way around.

it changes. or do you still own slaves xD



"so i win either way"
you might feel you have to give up 'earthly pleasures' to truly focus on believing in god. this could involve spending time for example praying, affecting your health, and using money, as well as missing out on other opportunities etc

That is an old argument. Have you heard of it before?

Pascal's wager - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[usupari]

I like how everyone is beating around the bush and not adressing the real problem... Religion is not the problem here, as Pislam is no religion... It is a fascist, disgusting, white-hating cult, which is more dangerous than national-socialism... And do not try to defend "Jesus", if you would read the Bible, Jesus was a lazy moFo who was wandering around and prreaching shit, instead of getting himself a job as any normal male would do even 2000 years ago... But since he was a shizophrenic mental, who believed he was Gods Son, he chose to molest people and then the Romans decided to make him pay

 

[slickrick27]

i share the moral outlook of the broader society

it changes. or do you still own slaves xD



"so i win either way"
you might feel you have to give up 'earthly pleasures' to truly focus on believing in god. this could involve spending time for example praying, affecting your health, and using money, as well as missing out on other opportunities etc

That is an old argument. Have you heard of it before?

Pascal's wager - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Yea basically in a nutshell. You think that's crazy to do?

 

[dwdays]

Jail time is short there and he can try again…fingers crossed