Can MAGA patriots debunk any of this stuff. Why do you support this man after all that has come out about him ?

[skulltaylor887]

This is the last thing I’m gonna say here but living in America is really fucking exhausting sometimes. We’re somehow are the richest country on the planet, have the most capital and the most wealth and we’re still dealing with the same issues we had since forever. Because I’m sick of working 40 hour weeks in this fucking hellhole and barely getting by. I’m sick of paying bill after bill and I’m sick of being told I’m not working hard enough. I’ll never forget at my lowest point when I had 20 dollars to my name and I gave it to this homeless dude that was limping. And I’m sick of fighting with republicans and I’m sick of fighting with democrats. When are we going to take care of eachother in this country? And if you want to call me a Nigger, or a retard then do it. I hope it makes you feel better. Like atp it’s either things get better for me or I’ll KMS whichever one comes first . I’m definitely not doing this for 40 more years. I can’t even imagine what it’s like for people with kids. Just saw a video of these oil executives chucking to themselves at the stock market . Fills me with rage. It’s literally war profiteering. If anyone else thinks that we’re voting our way out of this, then I’m afraid your a puppet in this country. Life is genuinely not this hard everywhere else.

 

[Fäthër Cörpsë]

typical Gen Z crying.

Life is not easy when you’re just starting out.

Get through it, get over it.

Either way, cry harder. It’s amusing to those that have endured it before you.

 

[skulltaylor887]

typical Gen Z crying.

Life is not easy when you’re just starting out.

Get through it, get over it.

Either way, cry harder. It’s amusing to those that have endured it before you.

Only the devil rejoices at the pain of others

 

[Fäthër Cörpsë]

Only the devil rejoices at the pain of others

Thought you were done talking 😑

 

[skulltaylor887]

Thought you were done talking 😑

It’s not good to always be in a state of schadenfreude

 

[Fäthër Cörpsë]

It’s not good to always be in a state of schadenfreude

Meh, you’ll get over that too, or you won’t.

Don’t care either way.

 

[skulltaylor887]

Meh, you’ll get over that too, or you won’t.

Don’t care either way.

What’s ur favorite mineral? Mine is vauxite. The stone can be so pretty. The one in my pfp today is apatite. It’s known for its vibrant color but I personally like the blue one the best.

 

[CaveBuck]

This is the last thing I’m gonna say here but living in America is really fucking exhausting sometimes. We’re somehow are the richest country on the planet, have the most capital and the most wealth and we’re still dealing with the same issues we had since forever. Because I’m sick of working 40 hour weeks in this fucking hellhole and barely getting by. I’m sick of paying bill after bill and I’m sick of being told I’m not working hard enough. I’ll never forget at my lowest point when I had 20 dollars to my name and I gave it to this homeless dude that was limping. And I’m sick of fighting with republicans and I’m sick of fighting with democrats. When are we going to take care of eachother in this country? And if you want to call me a Nigger, or a retard then do it. I hope it makes you feel better. Like atp it’s either things get better for me or I’ll KMS whichever one comes first . I’m definitely not doing this for 40 more years. I can’t even imagine what it’s like for people with kids. Just saw a video of these oil executives chucking to themselves at the stock market . Fills me with rage. It’s literally war profiteering. If anyone else thinks that we’re voting our way out of this, then I’m afraid your a puppet in this country. Life is genuinely not this hard everywhere else.

Your commentary gives the impression not of conviction grounded in careful inquiry, but of reflexive contrarianism sustained by conjecture and emotional projection. One need not agree with every opposing view to recognize when a discussion has departed from reasoned discourse and descended into performative antagonism.

What is most striking is not the hostility itself, but the conspicuous absence of intellectual discipline preceding it. Assertions are made with unwarranted certainty, hypothetical motives are assigned to strangers as though they were facts, and complex subjects are reduced to shallow caricatures evidently constructed with minimal research or reflection. Such habits do not strengthen an argument; they merely advertise an unwillingness to examine one’s own assumptions.
There is also a peculiar irony in provoking contempt while simultaneously presenting oneself as its victim. The pattern resembles less a sincere attempt at dialogue than a deliberate exercise in provocation—an attempt to bait reactions under the guise of debate. Yet this posture ultimately undermines itself because the lack of self-awareness becomes more memorable than the points being made.

You project the image of someone enamored with the aesthetics of intellectual rebellion without having undertaken the labor that genuine intellectualism requires: rigor, humility, curiosity, and the capacity for self-scrutiny. The result is not incisive criticism, but the appearance of a shallow pseudo-sophist mistaking cynicism for insight and provocation for substance.
If your intention is meaningful discussion, then research more carefully, reason more consistently, and engage with arguments as they are rather than as your preconceptions require them to be. Otherwise, the performance merely reveals itself for what it is: noise masquerading as depth.



TL;DR when I read through you're thread, I had a realization.

• fake or manipulative,
• superficial,
• careless about consequences,
• and poorly informed.
  
  (Also probably retarded.)

 

[skulltaylor887]

Your commentary gives the impression not of conviction grounded in careful inquiry, but of reflexive contrarianism sustained by conjecture and emotional projection. One need not agree with every opposing view to recognize when a discussion has departed from reasoned discourse and descended into performative antagonism.

What is most striking is not the hostility itself, but the conspicuous absence of intellectual discipline preceding it. Assertions are made with unwarranted certainty, hypothetical motives are assigned to strangers as though they were facts, and complex subjects are reduced to shallow caricatures evidently constructed with minimal research or reflection. Such habits do not strengthen an argument; they merely advertise an unwillingness to examine one’s own assumptions.
There is also a peculiar irony in provoking contempt while simultaneously presenting oneself as its victim. The pattern resembles less a sincere attempt at dialogue than a deliberate exercise in provocation—an attempt to bait reactions under the guise of debate. Yet this posture ultimately undermines itself because the lack of self-awareness becomes more memorable than the points being made.

You project the image of someone enamored with the aesthetics of intellectual rebellion without having undertaken the labor that genuine intellectualism requires: rigor, humility, curiosity, and the capacity for self-scrutiny. The result is not incisive criticism, but the appearance of a shallow pseudo-sophist mistaking cynicism for insight and provocation for substance.
If your intention is meaningful discussion, then research more carefully, reason more consistently, and engage with arguments as they are rather than as your preconceptions require them to be. Otherwise, the performance merely reveals itself for what it is: noise masquerading as depth.



TL;DR when I read through you're thread, I had a realization.

• fake or manipulative,
• superficial,
• careless about consequences,
• and poorly informed.
  
  (Also probably retarded.)

What are you trying to prove man. Ok you win great points

 

[skulltaylor887]

Your commentary gives the impression not of conviction grounded in careful inquiry, but of reflexive contrarianism sustained by conjecture and emotional projection. One need not agree with every opposing view to recognize when a discussion has departed from reasoned discourse and descended into performative antagonism.

What is most striking is not the hostility itself, but the conspicuous absence of intellectual discipline preceding it. Assertions are made with unwarranted certainty, hypothetical motives are assigned to strangers as though they were facts, and complex subjects are reduced to shallow caricatures evidently constructed with minimal research or reflection. Such habits do not strengthen an argument; they merely advertise an unwillingness to examine one’s own assumptions.
There is also a peculiar irony in provoking contempt while simultaneously presenting oneself as its victim. The pattern resembles less a sincere attempt at dialogue than a deliberate exercise in provocation—an attempt to bait reactions under the guise of debate. Yet this posture ultimately undermines itself because the lack of self-awareness becomes more memorable than the points being made.

You project the image of someone enamored with the aesthetics of intellectual rebellion without having undertaken the labor that genuine intellectualism requires: rigor, humility, curiosity, and the capacity for self-scrutiny. The result is not incisive criticism, but the appearance of a shallow pseudo-sophist mistaking cynicism for insight and provocation for substance.
If your intention is meaningful discussion, then research more carefully, reason more consistently, and engage with arguments as they are rather than as your preconceptions require them to be. Otherwise, the performance merely reveals itself for what it is: noise masquerading as depth.



TL;DR when I read through you're thread, I had a realization.

• fake or manipulative,
• superficial,
• careless about consequences,
• and poorly informed.
  
  (Also probably retarded.)

And how exactly am I misinformed. Are you telling me that I’m misinformed about my own life and reality that I’m living through ? Or because I get my information from a different source than you do?And retarded in what way exactly? Intelligence wise? Or intellectually? And partially, I am careless about consequences cause I don’t care if I live or die. How exactly am I supposed to view the world other than in a superficial way? The world constantly tell me that because of my skin color I am by default worse than any other counterpart on the planet. Superficial is literally the only lens that I’ve been given to see anything. White = morally trustworthy, black = criminal/ dishonest. And everyone here is proving that point. So yeah whatever I guess. At least if I was retarded I would probably die faster. The true retards don’t live that long

 

[Shaitan Al Tawakoni]

Who let this fucking retard in here? It smells like a sock.

 

[skulltaylor887]

Who let this fucking retard in here? It smells like a sock.

And you smell foreign with that name lol

 

[Shaitan Al Tawakoni]

And you smell foreign with that name lol

And yet again you prove yourself a fool. Fuck off retard.

 

[CaveBuck]

And how exactly am I misinformed. Are you telling me that I’m misinformed about my own life and reality that I’m living through ? Or because I get my information from a different source than you do?And retarded in what way exactly? Intelligence wise? Or intellectually? And partially, I am careless about consequences cause I don’t care if I live or die. How exactly am I supposed to view the world other than in a superficial way? The world constantly tell me that because of my skin color I am by default worse than any other counterpart on the planet. Superficial is literally the only lens that I’ve been given to see anything. White = morally trustworthy, black = criminal/ dishonest. And everyone here is proving that point. So yeah whatever I guess. At least if I was retarded I would probably die faster. The true retards don’t live that long

I think we already settled the core issue, so I’m good leaving it there.

 

[Vwj]

There’s probably so much more stuff that he’s done that’s not on the list . Can you imagine if Obama had any of these allegations behind his name?He’d be lynched by a mob. They lost their shit when he wore a tan suit.

Trump grabbing women by the pussy

You know that’s locker room talk right?

Trump mocking the disabled

I haven’t heard that one before but everybody mocks the disabled, even the disabled

Trump convicted of 34 felonies

Political felonies that was overturned right? In a democratic run court

Trump inciting Jan 6th

No he didn’t, even the BBC were called out on this,

Trump pardoning Jan 6th

Well most of them weren’t actually part of the violence,

Trump ignoring court orders

Dunno what your talking about on thisnone

Trump bombing iran

So Obama and Biden did bombing too without congress

Trump attempted to cover up the Epstein files

By releasing them?

Trump being mentioned in said files

So was whoopie Goldberg and loads of others that have said they didn’t kiddy fiddle, but Trump is mention mainly for political reasons

Trump getting the DOJ to refuse to release them

Yet there released

Trump doing away with due process

When? You talking about ice? You know going round picking up people with deportation orders from their due process from years ago?

Trump allowing ice to murder

Who they murdered?

Trump allowing ice to kidnap children

You talking about the kid who’s dad ran away and left him?

Trump alienating allies

Are the really allies when the help is one sided

Trump being impeached

Hmm ok, both times made up from bullshit again political prosecutions

Trump turning the national guard against americans

Dunno what your talking about here 🤷‍♂️

Trump cutting services

To people who contribute fuck all


Hope that helps
Plus I’m not maga

 

[carrierform]

Just pick the one that is less worse than the last at this point. If you had to vote between one pile of trash and another I guess you pick the one that stinks less.

Yeah but Kamala Harris, naw man, or fuckn Hillary. Trump 1.0 was better for sure but gonna need better than those two or dont complain lol.

 

[djdeeds]

Even if the stuff wasn’t true, wouldn’t you start to get suspicious of the allegations at some point? If someone had that many lawsuits and allegations against them, wouldn’t you think twice about voting that person into power ?

You should look into "Lawfare" and study what it means pal. "Lawfare" is what Shitlibs did to Trump relentlessly and ironically Trump COULD have responded by doing the same as revenge but hasn't .

 

[djdeeds]

You’re just mad because someone with a different opinion than you has infiltrated your echo chamber.

I'm currently popping some corn cos you're the newest complete idiot that thought they could waltz onto the minefield and not get totally obliterated by LOGIC and common sense. ... lemme guess, you're one of those carpet kissers too? fuck off back to the third world with that shit.

 

[Super Kirbo]

Are you here to debunk or insult me ? Or both ? I mainly am just interested in the 1st option. But free speech so idk say whatever you want

Well you claim free speech but alot of your list fall under free speech

 

[System Error]

Not really its part of the Scottish dialect.

The land of unisex skirts?