• Adults Only Website 18+

    If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.

    We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.

    We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.

    Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.

    We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.

    By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.

‘Aggressive’ homeless camp sweeps begin in San Francisco!⛺️🤞

“Very aggressive” homeless encampment sweeps, as recently touted by Mayor London Breed, began Tuesday morning in San Francisco following a major U.S. Supreme Court ruling.

The Standard witnessed aggressive enforcement action under the Central Freeway, carried out by police, the Department of Public Works, Department of Emergency Management, Homeless Outreach Team and San Francisco Fire Department.

Homeless people were not notified of the sweeps ahead of time, as has previously been the norm, according to a schedule of encampment clearings and a city official who was on the scene.

Tiffany Tannahill was watching over friends’ belongings when the sweep started on 13th Street. She said city workers showed up around 9:30 a.m.



Tannahill, who recently landed a homeless shelter bed, said she was given 15 minutes to gather all three of her friends’ belongings but was not allowed to disassemble and pack up the tent.

“One of the DPW workers started hollering past me, ‘I’m taking everything today,’ ” Tannahill said. “They were adamant that there wasn’t going to be enough time to pack up the tent.”

By 10:30 a.m., all city workers who were clearing the encampment had moved down the block, to the corner of 13th and Harrison streets.

Brandon Cunningham, the fire department’s incident commander at the scene of an encampment sweep near 13th and South Van Ness streets, told The Standard he was unsure whether people living at the site were notified beforehand. Tuesday’s schedule of encampment clearances, obtained by The Standard, does not list the location.


Cunningham said the Healthy Streets Operation Center, a multi-agency team that conducts encampment clearings, finished its scheduled morning operation early — so the team of officials decided to begin moving down 13th Street to continue clearing encampments.

“We’re trying to utilize the time that we had … instead of twiddling our thumbs for the next three hours,” Cunningham said. “We’re doing the general area.”

City staff have previously given notice to encampment occupants days before conducting a clearing.


Musical Interlude:



“London Breed, the mayor, Gov. Gavin Newsom says no more on the streets, no more encampments. No more. This is what it’s come down to. This is our laws,” the officer said.



Max Gunn and Kara Sullivan, who have been homeless in San Francisco for roughly two years, told The Standard the city threw away some of their clothes. Gunn said members of the Homeless Outreach Team told him there were no shelter beds available.

“They got my clothes,” Sullivan said. “They laughed at me and did a mocking New York accent and acted like they were tough.”

A spokesperson for the Department of Emergency Management disputed the individual’s account, saying everyone was offered shelter during Tuesday’s action.

The actions taken by the city likely stem from a routine court procedure finalized Tuesday. At the beginning of the month, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a local injunction that limited how aggressive the city could be in its sweeps, part of a lawsuit filed in 2022 by the Coalition on Homelessness. The appeals court overturned the injunction as a direct result of the Supreme Court’s decision which allows cities more power to clear encampments. On Tuesday, the appeals officially modified the injunction to be in line with June’s SCOTUS ruling.

Nisha Kashyap, an attorney representing the Coalition on Homelessness in the suit against the city, called the sweeps “alarming” and “unacceptable.”

“The city’s conduct blatantly violates the existing injunction against property destruction and disregards its own laws and policies that mandate advance notice and the provision of shelter and services,” Kashyap said in a statement Tuesday. “By ignoring the injunction, the city is not only acting unlawfully but also stripping people of their basic survival necessities, making it harder for them to exit homelessness.”

A statement from the mayor’s office said the city’s “street response will consist of offers of services and support on a daily basis, targeted encampment resolutions, and coordinated efforts to prevent re-encampments and new areas from being encamped.”



In a memo shared Tuesday by the mayor’s office, officials said they seek to prevent encampments from cropping up again once they have been cleared.

The city said smaller encampment clearings would be addressed by police and Public Works, working in tandem.

“District [police] station officers will conduct regular canvases of the areas to identify any encampments, and then work with Public Works staff to clear the areas,” the memo reads.

The memo also outlines the consequences homeless individuals may face if they continue to camp on the city’s streets and refuse shelter. These penalties include citations and possible arrest.

“The goal is not punishment, it is compliance,” the memo reads.



That was the full article, link for reference also the photos you can see here, I couldn’t post them here:https://sfstandard.com/2024/07/30/san-francisco-aggressive-homeless-camp-sweeps-begin/
 

Bruno Schulz

American by Birth, Dead Sexy by the Grace of God
Haha. I liked the musical interlude. That was creative.

I'm torn over this. On the one hand, I hate well-to-do city yuppies (and their little families) who whine about the sordid and unsavory realities of city life that existed long before they ever fucking moved in, and who complain about their plummeting property values, and whose moneyed tastes raise the property values for decent working- or middle-class folks. On the other hand, the homeless addict population does seem to have gotten out of hand there, and shouldn't be allowed to persist unchecked.

I haven't been to SF in maybe 5.5-6 years, and when I used to go it was because I couldn't find any dope in my area for one reason or another. At that time, all the homeless were willfully homeless - or as willfully homeless as an addict can be (e.g., the choice between spending money on opioids or instead saving money to acquire an apartment is really not a viable choice when dopesickness is always only a few hours away). I never noticed any homeless families while hanging out and using there. I know the pandemic pushed many families out of their homes, but I have a difficult time believing any responsible parents would willingly live around a bunch of homeless dopefiends. I think that a lot of people believe that the homeless population largely consists of such families. In my experience, that has not historically been the case. Whether that is the case now or not, I don't know; but I don't think so. I could be wrong because I haven't been there post-Pandemic, but I think this "street cleaning" is a necessity if the city hopes to recoup from the prolonged economic blow it has sustained due to crime and store closures resulting from crime.
 
This plastic Hollywood faggot wants to clean up CA now? The Mayor is just following orders.

A false just to make the cunt who will more than likely be running against Trump look presidential.

Both of them come from CA and the cunt is even more radical than this clown. He is not a VP pick since they reside in the same State.

The Democratic party brings nothing but destruction. I find it mind boggling how ignorant millions of my "fellow" Americans are.

I would love to see the day when CA once again turns red. There are still many US loving Americans (patriots) trapped in CA.
 
Perhaps they should do what you should and get a fucking job.
Come on Bu-Bu I thought I was getting through to you and you are starting up again. Throwing hate my way is not going to quiet the demons

So where are they being swept to? Bc wherever they end up, that place will soon tank.
That’s a good question actually. Im not sure. I know one person got a spot in a shelter so maybe they are going there. Hopefully this will push some of them to get clean so they can get there life back together and they can get a place and not shoot all their money in their vein.

This plastic Hollywood faggot wants to clean up CA now? The Mayor is just following orders.

A false just to make the cunt who will more than likely be running against Trump look presidential.

Both of them come from CA and the cunt is even more radical than this clown. He is not a VP pick since they reside in the same State.

The Democratic party brings nothing but destruction. I find it mind boggling how ignorant millions of my "fellow" Americans are.

I would love to see the day when CA once again turns red. There are still many US loving Americans (patriots) trapped in CA.
lol you are literally voting for a traitor that put his in fucked up ability to not admit defeat ahead of the constitution and the country. You have the gall to pretend you are a patriot. Get fucking real dude.

Aggressive? No. Aggressive would be sending in death squads to rid that city of habitual vagrants and set a real precedent for other potential sweeps...
It’s aggressive compared to what they were doing before, which was nothing.

Boo fucking hoo!
Long time no see Goat. When did you crawl back out of your mama’s ass?
 
Haha. I liked the musical interlude. That was creative.

I'm torn over this. On the one hand, I hate well-to-do city yuppies (and their little families) who whine about the sordid and unsavory realities of city life that existed long before they ever fucking moved in, and who complain about their plummeting property values, and whose moneyed tastes raise the property values for decent working- or middle-class folks. On the other hand, the homeless addict population does seem to have gotten out of hand there, and shouldn't be allowed to persist unchecked.

I haven't been to SF in maybe 5.5-6 years, and when I used to go it was because I couldn't find any dope in my area for one reason or another. At that time, all the homeless were willfully homeless - or as willfully homeless as an addict can be (e.g., the choice between spending money on opioids or instead saving money to acquire an apartment is really not a viable choice when dopesickness is always only a few hours away). I never noticed any homeless families while hanging out and using there. I know the pandemic pushed many families out of their homes, but I have a difficult time believing any responsible parents would willingly live around a bunch of homeless dopefiends. I think that a lot of people believe that the homeless population largely consists of such families. In my experience, that has not historically been the case. Whether that is the case now or not, I don't know; but I don't think so. I could be wrong because I haven't been there post-Pandemic, but I think this "street cleaning" is a necessity if the city hopes to recoup from the prolonged economic blow it has sustained due to crime and store closures resulting from crime.
Thanks hehe. I don’t know where that came from. I’m just creative, I got lucky because I choose to be lol.

I see where you are coming from. The thing is it is out of control and so is the theft. I was an opiate addict for like 3-4 until I realized I had to stop because I knew the road I was going down, I was heavy into benzos though, so I know what it’s like to be an addict. I just don’t see how letting these people do this, over 90% if not higher of these people are addicts, fentanyl and meth, and just letting them live on the street with no consequences doesn’t seem to be helping them. Nevermind all the benefits they get. It’s just you don’t go make it as comfortable as possible for an addict or they will never stop. Sure it sucks pushing someone off the sidewalk or arresting them and making them choose jail time or rehab but it has to be done I think. It’s like how Oregon recriminalized fentanyl and meth because the od’s were sky rocking because people who would be safe in jail are out using and dying. There is no “nice” solution to this and as you said when you are dopesick you’re not thinking like a normal person.
 

Father Corpse

Papal Bull
Hopefully the Pacific ocean.
That was my first thought as well
1722386649902.gif
 
i wish they would sweep the frigging homeless out of my town too

folks complain about hookers and drug dealers, but they have jobs and don't sleep under my porch...
Execute them. I'm not suggesting that we're mean or savage about it, just put them to sleep like an old dog.
 
Back
Top