As are you....You're entitled to your opinion MARK.W
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
As are you....You're entitled to your opinion MARK.W
Having nothing to lose makes one a very dangerous person.So what were her victims guilty of, where would have been their justice if she had have gotten psychiatric help and treated with kid gloves? Is it rational to see them as the perp's and her as the victim? All they did was pay for sex and ended getting blown away (excuse the pun) for their trouble. She was executed and rightly so.
No, sometimes not everything is so cut and dry. Do some research on her, form legit sources, you'll see.So what were her victims guilty of, where would have been their justice if she had have gotten psychiatric help and treated with kid gloves? Is it rational to see them as the perp's and her as the victim? All they did was pay for sex and ended getting blown away (excuse the pun) for their trouble. She was executed and rightly so.
I agree, a person that has no business walking the streets a free person.Having nothing to lose makes one a very dangerous person.
She didn't. But there was more to this particular woman than what media presented and L.E.I agree, a person that has no business walking the streets a free person.
Why are you trying to justify what she did? She murdered men because of her alleged abuse as a child, she hated men so some poor bastards paid with their lives later on. I understand that your childhood shapes you into what you are in a lot of cases, but that is not the victims fault, she killed them in cold blood so deserved her death sentence. I don't understand how you can see it any different than that.She didn't. But there was more to this particular woman than what media presented and L.E.
No, i do NOT justify her at all. There was much more going on in her particular case that was overlooked, when it should not have been. I never justify any thing such as that. But, to know the details in her case, sometimes I wonder.Why are you trying to justify what she did? She murdered men because of her alleged abuse as a child, she hated men so some poor bastards paid with their lives later on. I understand that your childhood shapes you into what you are in a lot of cases, but that is not the victims fault, she killed them in cold blood so deserved her death sentence. I don't understand how you can see it any different than that.
No, i do NOT justify her at all. There was much more going on in her particular case that was overlooked, when it should not have been. I never justify any thing such as that. But, to know the details in her case, sometimes I wonder.
Yes if you could call murdering people a reaction, I would call it an overreaction. You are not seeing the victims point of view here, they didn't deserve to die, they did nothing to her apart from pick her up for sex. The excuses she made were laughable, how many times did she claim to have been raped by Johns? Sorry that is far fetched to say the least.No. There were times she was forced to react. Insanity should have been included to some extent. This woman went through hell that most could barely even fathom for an instant.
Imo, they were too judgmental with her, and rushed her way too conveniently to her death. Again, I don't justify killing anyone-But, there were too many issues with her that were overlooked and should not have been.
No! one raped her so bad with a broken glass (bottle) in the anus, the preacher it think it was.. part of her duties as being a prostitute.. she retaliated..Yes if you could call murdering people a reaction, I would call it an overreaction. You are not seeing the victims point of view here, they didn't deserve to die, they did nothing to her apart from pick her up for sex. The excuses she made were laughable, how many times did she claim to have been raped by Johns? Sorry that is far fetched to say the least.
Is there a police or medical report to support this? if so can I see it?No! one raped her so bad with a broken glass (bottle) in the anus, the preacher it think it was.. part of her duties as being a prostitute.. she retaliated..
its out there. part of the court transcripts.Is there a police or medical report to support this? if so can I see it?
Was she actually prostituting herself when she killed those six men, or were they merely being kind and offering her a lift as she had pretended to have broken down and needed a lift?its out there. part of the court transcripts.
she was prostituting herself. YES. It were those johns that raped, or brought on even more hard core venting sexually that she responded as she did. Again, I'm not justifying her murders, Imo there were many details ignored in her case, in particularly.Was she actually prostituting herself when she killed those six men, or were they merely being kind and offering her a lift as she had pretended to have broken down and needed a lift?
You see there are conflicting stories about whether they actually were Johns, she says yes others say no. Which one am I to believe? if in fact she did lure them to their deaths by feigning to be stranded would you be so willing to defend her then?she was prostituting herself. YES. It were those johns that raped, or brought on even more hard core venting sexually that she responded as she did. Again, I'm not justifying her murders, Imo there were many details ignored in her case, in particularly.
Her claim of having had sex with 250,000 men (which was widely reported as truth) is preposterous; such a feat would require the bedding of 35 different men a day every day for 20 years. Wuornos had neither the stamina nor the planning skills necessary for such a record-breaking performance.
From what i understand the wives of some of the victims may not want to admit to their husbands getting it on with skanky looking highway hookers / lot lizards. Seriously doubt any of these guys mistook her for a clean cut damsel in distress.You see there are conflicting stories about whether they actually were Johns, she says yes others say no. Which one am I to believe? if in fact she did lure them to their deaths by feigning to be stranded would you be so willing to defend her then?
If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.
We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.
We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.
Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.
We have a 10 year old thriving community here with 340,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.
By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.