• Adults Only Website 18+

    If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.

    We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.

    We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.

    Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.

    We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.

    By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.

Funny Negress U.S. Representative Says Committing Crime Doesn’t Make You a Criminal

bruhno.gif
 
This just shows how stupid the Democrat party has become.... She is idolized as the next great thing to come from that party. Listening to her, I feel like i lost IQ points.
On the other hand, Kennedy has made some unusually stupid statements on causes of autism lately.

Now, I'm glad Biden has gone and I'm only an observer, but Kennedy is a strange cat. A very strange cat indeed.

But to the nigger above, the whole root of the word 'criminal' is related entirely to crime. If you commit a crime you are a criminal.

But we live in a world where if you say you are a woman then you are a real woman no matter how long your cock is so I guess in that sense it is logically consistant.

Niggers. FFS...
 
Weave Warrior Jasmine Crockett makes eye-opening statement.

View attachment 921246
i mean sadly she is kinda right, a "criminal" in the older sense, is someone who makes a living committing crimes, not someone who dabbles in crime occasionally. the problem though, arises when you use this to excuse people dabbling in crime "because they arent CAREER criminals".

no crime is ok, punishments should be handed out like candy for it.

that being said, as much as i hate to say this, *puts nerd glasses on* TECHNICALLY, shes right. if you go by the older (still used, but mostly outdated) usage of the word "criminal"


god i hate when people do this, its like how misinfo works, throw like 10% truth into 90% bullshit and people start thinking maybe its not bullshit.
 
i mean sadly she is kinda right, a "criminal" in the older sense, is someone who makes a living committing crimes, not someone who dabbles in crime occasionally. the problem though, arises when you use this to excuse people dabbling in crime "because they arent CAREER criminals".

no crime is ok, punishments should be handed out like candy for it.

that being said, as much as i hate to say this, *puts nerd glasses on* TECHNICALLY, shes right. if you go by the older (still used, but mostly outdated) usage of the word "criminal"


god i hate when people do this, its like how misinfo works, throw like 10% truth into 90% bullshit and people start thinking maybe its not bullshit.
I disagree with you. There is no distinction made between the frequency of a committed crime.

You commit a crime, you are a criminal. Period.
 
I disagree with you. There is no distinction made between the frequency of a committed crime.

You commit a crime, you are a criminal. Period
alright go off im just saying how the word was used for hundreds of years but guess that doesnt matter


legally they have made that distinction in hundreds of countries over thousands of years, but then again, guess it doesnt matter
 
alright go off im just saying how the word was used for hundreds of years but guess that doesnt matter


legally they have made that distinction in hundreds of countries over thousands of years, but then again, guess it doesnt matter
If that’s how it was used for thousands of years in a million countries, should we also resort to the customary punishments historically seen for those crimes as well?

No, we wouldn’t bc that’s not modern. And neither is that definition. Today’s word, today’s rules.
 
If that’s how it was used for thousands of years in a million countries, should we also resort to the customary punishments historically seen for those crimes as well?

No, we wouldn’t bc that’s not modern. And neither is that definition. Today’s word, today’s rules.
yeah no shit retard.

do you know how to read? my original comment was all about THE OLD DEFINITION as in, you know, THE PAST USAGE. how HISTORICALLY she is right. crazy how words mean things
 
Please ,please Jazzy !! Run on the ticket with AOC for 2028 president Hope and change ? No ..Dope and deranged.
I can’t wait ? You won’t win one state or district.!!
 
Back
Top