• Adults Only Website 18+

    If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.

    We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.

    We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.

    Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.

    We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.

    By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.

What came first the laws of nature, or the universe?

He didn't come from anything or anywhere because God's don't exist.
no. you can't tell the truth from the lies because you're a non-christian.

youproblem.jpg
 
in ancient times many tried to philosophize the start of our origins but when the jesus times rolled around they weaponized independent thinking with the bible.

every violent religion does this, its called heresy. we only need to open any history book to find the proof.

so again, what is god, not who?
God is eternal. It's really not that hard of a concept to understand. God is omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent. Look up those words because I'm sure you don't understand them.
 

Alot of people don't know that the big bang theory doesn't explain the creation of the cosmos, but rather the evolution of it. So even if someone were to accept the big bang theory, where were the forces of nature before matter? If you believe in the laws of nature, they aren't physical, they aren't something we can see even with a telescope or microscope, but we know they are there and they exist. Kinda sounds like God to me, what do you think?


If I were to believe that something came from nothing, there were still the laws and forces of nature that govern the entire universe. Which means there was still something even before matter existed. There had to of been some kind of energy, and we know through physics, energy can not be created from nothing.
"YES!"
😆😆😆...SP
 
Fucking hell.... I've got through ALOT of the comments but it's starting to break my brain thinking about it now...😂🤣
This is probably the ONLY subject that completley demolishes my capability of thinking and breaks me...
This and WHY men just never listen...🤔😂
 

Alot of people don't know that the big bang theory doesn't explain the creation of the cosmos, but rather the evolution of it. So even if someone were to accept the big bang theory, where were the forces of nature before matter? If you believe in the laws of nature, they aren't physical, they aren't something we can see even with a telescope or microscope, but we know they are there and they exist. Kinda sounds like God to me, what do you think?


If I were to believe that something came from nothing, there were still the laws and forces of nature that govern the entire universe. Which means there was still something even before matter existed. There had to of been some kind of energy, and we know through physics, energy can not be created from nothing.
White hole?
 

I think I posted the right video here. I believe it's possible for everything to have came from nothing in the sense that there was still a force of nature that existed. Space, time and matter had to of been created together. This 60 second video explains it better than I can.

 
Back
Top