Kyle Rittenhouse Discussion Thread (3 Viewers)

[Johnnyboy27290]

You are a defund the policer and BLM masturbator.

You are, in fact, a troll.

The US police are ham strung now by having to double think themselves because of this Floyed crap.

Until something happens to you or your loved ones. Your just retarded probably live in the middle of the woods where nothing ever happens. Atleast blm stands up for something where white people are not united at all. And the police do too damn much and oppress the people. Your a lame too obvious. Never seen nothing never done nothing.

Post automatically merged: Nov 16, 2021

I agree

Hanged for what defending himself? Let a group of people chase you and smash you in the head with a skate board and drop kick you and point a loaded gun at you and see what you do. Probably nothing anyways cuz your a lame and can't fight or shoot a firearm.

 

[wiggins]

Rittenhouse prosecution shoots from the hip​

Amber Athey

YouTube





Amber Athey

16 November 2021

3:01 PM

There are three basic rules of gun safety: always keep your firearm pointed in a safe direction, always keep it unloaded until you’re ready to use, and never put your finger on the trigger until you’re ready to shoot. Thomas Binger, the lead prosecutor in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, violated two of those three rules in the courtroom Monday.
Binger, who has built most of his case on Rittenhouse’s decision to carry a rifle to the Kenosha riots last summer, pointed a rifle at the crowded courtroom with his finger directly on the trigger. It was a stunning bookend to the prosecution’s fantastical argument against Rittenhouse, and the latest reminder that those who wish to take away your right to defend yourself with firearms know next to nothing about them.
Binger held up the rifle as a demonstration; he alleged that Rittenhouse pointed his gun at another rioter prior to shooting Joseph Rosenbaum. According to Binger’s version of events, Rittenhouse “provoked” the violence against him, while the rioters who attacked him were “heroes” trying to stop an active shooter.
Binger’s claim that Rittenhouse pointed his gun at other rioters before Rosenbaum rests on grainy drone footage “enhanced” by a forensic imaging specialist. The specialist admitted that he did not compare the zoomed-in version of the video to the original. He also testified that new pixels will be added to enlarged images, thus undermining their accuracy. The footage was so dubious that the judge was reticent to even allow it into evidence. Most importantly, Binger did not call those he claims were at the end of Rittenhouse’s gun to testify.
Most of Binger’s earlier arguments were even more brazen, undermining the basic right to self defense.


“You lose the right to self-defense when you’re the one who brought the gun,” Binger said at one point Monday, suggesting that merely carrying a firearm constitutes a direct threat to others. This not only flies in the face of the Second Amendment, but by such logic, those in the courtroom would have been justified in rushing Binger when he pointed a rifle in their direction during his closing argument.
In questioning Rittenhouse during his testimony last week, Binger intentionally blurred the lines between being an aggressor and a victim. He argued that Rittenhouse had no reason to be afraid of Rosenbaum because he had a weapon and Rosenbaum did not. Rosenbaum, Binger claimed, was the one acting in self-defense because a gun was pointed at him. The video evidence, however, shows that Rittenhouse was retreating and Rosenbaum was chasing. If Rosenbaum was only trying to protect himself, he almost certainly would have stopped his advance when Rittenhouse raised his rifle. Instead, he lunged for Rittenhouse’s weapon.
Binger attempted the same argument on behalf of Anthony Huber, the man who assaulted Rittenhouse with a skateboard, and Gaige Grosskreutz, who pointed a handgun at Rittenhouse’s head. Rittenhouse was retreating and verbalized that he was going to the police when rioters struck him in the head, knocking him to the ground. It was then, when he could no longer run away, that Huber and Grosskreutz attacked him. Still, Binger claimed that Rittenhouse shouldn’t have feared for his life because he had a rifle against Huber’s skateboard and Grosskreutz’s handgun.
Yes, Binger actually argued in a court of law that you may not defend yourself if your attacker has a physically smaller weapon than you.
Binger’s standard for self-defense would lead to open season on gun owners. The logical conclusion of his argument is that any time someone carries a firearm, even legally, those around him are justified in assuming that he is an active shooter and reacting accordingly. The gun owner would then be forbidden from protecting himself because those who attacked him were acting in “self-defense.”
This was not the only absurd line of reasoning about firearms followed by Binger. He argued that Rittenhouse should not have been in fear of his weapon being taken by Rosenbaum because he was wearing a rifle sling, the purpose of which is to prevent disarmament. Rittenhouse testified that the sling’s purpose that night was to keep his hands free so he could render medical aid to the injured. Hunters regularly use slings to prevent fatigue when carrying heavy rifles long distances. Even so, could Rittenhouse have reasonably depended on a cheap rifle sling to save his life in the split second that Rosenbaum tried to snatch his weapon?
Judge Schroeder stepped in on Monday to dismiss one of the more obviously bunk gun charges the state brought against Rittenhouse, confirming that 17-year-olds are legally allowed to carry long guns in Wisconsin. This was a major blow to Binger’s case as it undermined the notion that Rittenhouse was acting recklessly or illegally before he was attacked.
The jury in the Rittenhouse trial will start deliberations on Tuesday. The stakes are high. The prosecution has made sure that this is not just about a teenage boy’s life, but about the basic right to self-defense and to bear arms. If the jury decides that the act of carrying a firearm nullifies your right to protect yourself, gun owners everywhere better look out.

Post automatically merged: Nov 16, 2021

Until something happens to you or your loved ones. Your just retarded probably live in the middle of the woods where nothing ever happens. Atleast blm stands up for something where white people are not united at all. And the police do too damn much and oppress the people. Your a lame too obvious. Never seen nothing never done nothing.

Post automatically merged: Nov 16, 2021

Hanged for what defending himself? Let a group of people chase you and smash you in the head with a skate board and drop kick you and point a loaded gun at you and see what you do. Probably nothing anyways cuz your a lame and can't fight or shoot a firearm.

Johnnyboy has proven beyond doubt he is a troll.
BLM does stand for something: Being a Lame Masterbater.
What little Johnnyboy does not understand is that he is caught up in something that was cooked up in the humanities departments of universities where PHD candidates were racking their brains trying to think up a thesis subject. It's all increadibly exciting at uni when you first get there.
All sorts of radical new ideas that are so convincing. You can actually change the world!! Wow!!

And so you start to specialise and read up on race theory and read only about injustices and speak only to your other uni buddies who are reading the same thing and go to lectures and hear experts putting forward cogitant arguments that add to the bleak picture and next thing you know you're screwing the hot chick with dread locks who prasises your wokeness and you go on a few marches...

Your whole world view is now an echo chamber. So you write your thesis, get your PHD, settle down as an academic. Start to think its all actually bullshitt but you cant speak out because you don't have tenure.

And the trickle down effect is that functional illiterates like little johny here start sucking on the university fed tit and getting the whole thing way out of context as he does not read primary texts and cannot critique what he hears. Similar to those uni idiots above who at least are reading the primary texts...

And so he becomes a usful idiot for the BLM and their (nigger lover) supporters.

Meanwhile in Africa neck lacing goes on unabated and no one gives a shit...

 

[Grand Mal Caesar]

Rittenhouse prosecution shoots from the hip​

Amber Athey

YouTube





Amber Athey

16 November 2021

3:01 PM

There are three basic rules of gun safety: always keep your firearm pointed in a safe direction, always keep it unloaded until you’re ready to use, and never put your finger on the trigger until you’re ready to shoot. Thomas Binger, the lead prosecutor in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, violated two of those three rules in the courtroom Monday.
Binger, who has built most of his case on Rittenhouse’s decision to carry a rifle to the Kenosha riots last summer, pointed a rifle at the crowded courtroom with his finger directly on the trigger. It was a stunning bookend to the prosecution’s fantastical argument against Rittenhouse, and the latest reminder that those who wish to take away your right to defend yourself with firearms know next to nothing about them.
Binger held up the rifle as a demonstration; he alleged that Rittenhouse pointed his gun at another rioter prior to shooting Joseph Rosenbaum. According to Binger’s version of events, Rittenhouse “provoked” the violence against him, while the rioters who attacked him were “heroes” trying to stop an active shooter.
Binger’s claim that Rittenhouse pointed his gun at other rioters before Rosenbaum rests on grainy drone footage “enhanced” by a forensic imaging specialist. The specialist admitted that he did not compare the zoomed-in version of the video to the original. He also testified that new pixels will be added to enlarged images, thus undermining their accuracy. The footage was so dubious that the judge was reticent to even allow it into evidence. Most importantly, Binger did not call those he claims were at the end of Rittenhouse’s gun to testify.
Most of Binger’s earlier arguments were even more brazen, undermining the basic right to self defense.


“You lose the right to self-defense when you’re the one who brought the gun,” Binger said at one point Monday, suggesting that merely carrying a firearm constitutes a direct threat to others. This not only flies in the face of the Second Amendment, but by such logic, those in the courtroom would have been justified in rushing Binger when he pointed a rifle in their direction during his closing argument.
In questioning Rittenhouse during his testimony last week, Binger intentionally blurred the lines between being an aggressor and a victim. He argued that Rittenhouse had no reason to be afraid of Rosenbaum because he had a weapon and Rosenbaum did not. Rosenbaum, Binger claimed, was the one acting in self-defense because a gun was pointed at him. The video evidence, however, shows that Rittenhouse was retreating and Rosenbaum was chasing. If Rosenbaum was only trying to protect himself, he almost certainly would have stopped his advance when Rittenhouse raised his rifle. Instead, he lunged for Rittenhouse’s weapon.
Binger attempted the same argument on behalf of Anthony Huber, the man who assaulted Rittenhouse with a skateboard, and Gaige Grosskreutz, who pointed a handgun at Rittenhouse’s head. Rittenhouse was retreating and verbalized that he was going to the police when rioters struck him in the head, knocking him to the ground. It was then, when he could no longer run away, that Huber and Grosskreutz attacked him. Still, Binger claimed that Rittenhouse shouldn’t have feared for his life because he had a rifle against Huber’s skateboard and Grosskreutz’s handgun.
Yes, Binger actually argued in a court of law that you may not defend yourself if your attacker has a physically smaller weapon than you.
Binger’s standard for self-defense would lead to open season on gun owners. The logical conclusion of his argument is that any time someone carries a firearm, even legally, those around him are justified in assuming that he is an active shooter and reacting accordingly. The gun owner would then be forbidden from protecting himself because those who attacked him were acting in “self-defense.”
This was not the only absurd line of reasoning about firearms followed by Binger. He argued that Rittenhouse should not have been in fear of his weapon being taken by Rosenbaum because he was wearing a rifle sling, the purpose of which is to prevent disarmament. Rittenhouse testified that the sling’s purpose that night was to keep his hands free so he could render medical aid to the injured. Hunters regularly use slings to prevent fatigue when carrying heavy rifles long distances. Even so, could Rittenhouse have reasonably depended on a cheap rifle sling to save his life in the split second that Rosenbaum tried to snatch his weapon?
Judge Schroeder stepped in on Monday to dismiss one of the more obviously bunk gun charges the state brought against Rittenhouse, confirming that 17-year-olds are legally allowed to carry long guns in Wisconsin. This was a major blow to Binger’s case as it undermined the notion that Rittenhouse was acting recklessly or illegally before he was attacked.
The jury in the Rittenhouse trial will start deliberations on Tuesday. The stakes are high. The prosecution has made sure that this is not just about a teenage boy’s life, but about the basic right to self-defense and to bear arms. If the jury decides that the act of carrying a firearm nullifies your right to protect yourself, gun owners everywhere better look out.

Post automatically merged: Nov 16, 2021

Johnnyboy has proven beyond doubt he is a troll.
BLM does stand for something: Being a Lame Masterbater.
What little Johnnyboy does not understand is that he is caught up in something that was cooked up in the humanities departments of universities where PHD candidates were racking their brains trying to think up a thesis subject. It's all increadibly exciting at uni when you first get there.
All sorts of radical new ideas that are so convincing. You can actually change the world!! Wow!!

And so you start to specialise and read up on race theory and read only about injustices and speak only to your other uni buddies who are reading the same thing and go to lectures and hear experts putting forward cogitant arguments that add to the bleak picture and next thing you know you're screwing the hot chick with dread locks who prasises your wokeness and you go on a few marches...

Your whole world view is now an echo chamber. So you write your thesis, get your PHD, settle down as an academic. Start to think its all actually bullshitt but you cant speak out because you don't have tenure.

And the trickle down effect is that functional illiterates like little johny here start sucking on the university fed tit and getting the whole thing way out of context as he does not read primary texts and cannot critique what he hears. Similar to those uni idiots above who at least are reading the primary texts...

And so he becomes a usful idiot for the BLM and their (nigger lover) supporters.

Meanwhile in Africa neck lacing goes on unabated and no one gives a shit...

I hadn't been able to watch much of trial last week. I only saw the highlights and read about it.

I had time last Friday to watch the whole session. That was the most ridiculous prosecution I have ever seen. It was like something from out of Seinfeld or It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia. The only only thing missing were the antics of Kramer and Charlie Day.

There was so much stifled laughter when the prosecution was trying to play the shitty video Towards the end of the session. There was always somebody turning away and covering their mouth while their shoulders slightly heaved as they giggled. The judge too.

I wonder if prosecution thought the judge was going to roll with them. They were so unprepared.

 

[flatearthbabe69]

fake and staged to paint the right as gun toting psychopaths,
Kyle "crying" on the stand with no tears was probably the worst crisis acting I have seen thus far

 

[Vwj]

I know which one I’d feel safer with a gun around me

 

[Smooby]

Post automatically merged: Nov 16, 2021

This you?!?!? View attachment 555857

This could be him

 

[wiggins]

Until something happens to you or your loved ones. Your just retarded probably live in the middle of the woods where nothing ever happens. Atleast blm stands up for something where white people are not united at all. And the police do too damn much and oppress the people. Your a lame too obvious. Never seen nothing never done nothing.

Post automatically merged: Nov 16, 2021

Hanged for what defending himself? Let a group of people chase you and smash you in the head with a skate board and drop kick you and point a loaded gun at you and see what you do. Probably nothing anyways cuz your a lame and can't fight or shoot a firearm.

Now, little Johny, how about putting that in English if thats not too much trouble.

I have no idea whatsoever what "Your a lame too obvious" means.

And as to 'never done nothing never seen nothing' (with no commas, so wrong...) I have seen star ships burning off the cusp of orion and all that...

So, Wrong! again...

Are you speaking ebonics?

 

[Götterdämmerung]

Hanged for what defending himself? Let a group of people chase you and smash you in the head with a skate board and drop kick you and point a loaded gun at you and see what you do. Probably nothing anyways cuz your a lame and can't fight or shoot a firearm.

Let's forget for a second the absurdity that I would be jogging down the street with an AR15. What if he was walking down the street with a machete and he killed two people who tried to disarm him. And don't tell me it's different because it's unlawful to carry a machete. Your argument is valid only in the microverse of the altercation. If you zoom out and see the big picture the question becomes why did he go there? Maybe he wasn't going to start anything but he was sure the hell going to finish it.

 

[Johnnyboy27290]

Now, little Johny, how about putting that in English if thats not too much trouble.

I have no idea whatsoever what "Your a lame too obvious" means.

And as to 'never done nothing never seen nothing' (with no commas, so wrong...) I have seen star ships burning off the cusp of orion and all that...

So, Wrong! again...

Are you speaking ebonics?

You don't know what a lame is? Lol now that's funny. You've seen star ships burning off the cusp of Orion and you can't tell that geroge Floyd was murdered? Here let me speak in your native language your a uneducated retard. Can you understand what that means? Google it if your still struggling.

Post automatically merged: Nov 17, 2021

Rittenhouse prosecution shoots from the hip​

Amber Athey

YouTube





Amber Athey

16 November 2021

3:01 PM

There are three basic rules of gun safety: always keep your firearm pointed in a safe direction, always keep it unloaded until you’re ready to use, and never put your finger on the trigger until you’re ready to shoot. Thomas Binger, the lead prosecutor in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, violated two of those three rules in the courtroom Monday.
Binger, who has built most of his case on Rittenhouse’s decision to carry a rifle to the Kenosha riots last summer, pointed a rifle at the crowded courtroom with his finger directly on the trigger. It was a stunning bookend to the prosecution’s fantastical argument against Rittenhouse, and the latest reminder that those who wish to take away your right to defend yourself with firearms know next to nothing about them.
Binger held up the rifle as a demonstration; he alleged that Rittenhouse pointed his gun at another rioter prior to shooting Joseph Rosenbaum. According to Binger’s version of events, Rittenhouse “provoked” the violence against him, while the rioters who attacked him were “heroes” trying to stop an active shooter.
Binger’s claim that Rittenhouse pointed his gun at other rioters before Rosenbaum rests on grainy drone footage “enhanced” by a forensic imaging specialist. The specialist admitted that he did not compare the zoomed-in version of the video to the original. He also testified that new pixels will be added to enlarged images, thus undermining their accuracy. The footage was so dubious that the judge was reticent to even allow it into evidence. Most importantly, Binger did not call those he claims were at the end of Rittenhouse’s gun to testify.
Most of Binger’s earlier arguments were even more brazen, undermining the basic right to self defense.


“You lose the right to self-defense when you’re the one who brought the gun,” Binger said at one point Monday, suggesting that merely carrying a firearm constitutes a direct threat to others. This not only flies in the face of the Second Amendment, but by such logic, those in the courtroom would have been justified in rushing Binger when he pointed a rifle in their direction during his closing argument.
In questioning Rittenhouse during his testimony last week, Binger intentionally blurred the lines between being an aggressor and a victim. He argued that Rittenhouse had no reason to be afraid of Rosenbaum because he had a weapon and Rosenbaum did not. Rosenbaum, Binger claimed, was the one acting in self-defense because a gun was pointed at him. The video evidence, however, shows that Rittenhouse was retreating and Rosenbaum was chasing. If Rosenbaum was only trying to protect himself, he almost certainly would have stopped his advance when Rittenhouse raised his rifle. Instead, he lunged for Rittenhouse’s weapon.
Binger attempted the same argument on behalf of Anthony Huber, the man who assaulted Rittenhouse with a skateboard, and Gaige Grosskreutz, who pointed a handgun at Rittenhouse’s head. Rittenhouse was retreating and verbalized that he was going to the police when rioters struck him in the head, knocking him to the ground. It was then, when he could no longer run away, that Huber and Grosskreutz attacked him. Still, Binger claimed that Rittenhouse shouldn’t have feared for his life because he had a rifle against Huber’s skateboard and Grosskreutz’s handgun.
Yes, Binger actually argued in a court of law that you may not defend yourself if your attacker has a physically smaller weapon than you.
Binger’s standard for self-defense would lead to open season on gun owners. The logical conclusion of his argument is that any time someone carries a firearm, even legally, those around him are justified in assuming that he is an active shooter and reacting accordingly. The gun owner would then be forbidden from protecting himself because those who attacked him were acting in “self-defense.”
This was not the only absurd line of reasoning about firearms followed by Binger. He argued that Rittenhouse should not have been in fear of his weapon being taken by Rosenbaum because he was wearing a rifle sling, the purpose of which is to prevent disarmament. Rittenhouse testified that the sling’s purpose that night was to keep his hands free so he could render medical aid to the injured. Hunters regularly use slings to prevent fatigue when carrying heavy rifles long distances. Even so, could Rittenhouse have reasonably depended on a cheap rifle sling to save his life in the split second that Rosenbaum tried to snatch his weapon?
Judge Schroeder stepped in on Monday to dismiss one of the more obviously bunk gun charges the state brought against Rittenhouse, confirming that 17-year-olds are legally allowed to carry long guns in Wisconsin. This was a major blow to Binger’s case as it undermined the notion that Rittenhouse was acting recklessly or illegally before he was attacked.
The jury in the Rittenhouse trial will start deliberations on Tuesday. The stakes are high. The prosecution has made sure that this is not just about a teenage boy’s life, but about the basic right to self-defense and to bear arms. If the jury decides that the act of carrying a firearm nullifies your right to protect yourself, gun owners everywhere better look out.

Post automatically merged: Nov 16, 2021

Johnnyboy has proven beyond doubt he is a troll.
BLM does stand for something: Being a Lame Masterbater.
What little Johnnyboy does not understand is that he is caught up in something that was cooked up in the humanities departments of universities where PHD candidates were racking their brains trying to think up a thesis subject. It's all increadibly exciting at uni when you first get there.
All sorts of radical new ideas that are so convincing. You can actually change the world!! Wow!!

And so you start to specialise and read up on race theory and read only about injustices and speak only to your other uni buddies who are reading the same thing and go to lectures and hear experts putting forward cogitant arguments that add to the bleak picture and next thing you know you're screwing the hot chick with dread locks who prasises your wokeness and you go on a few marches...

Your whole world view is now an echo chamber. So you write your thesis, get your PHD, settle down as an academic. Start to think its all actually bullshitt but you cant speak out because you don't have tenure.

And the trickle down effect is that functional illiterates like little johny here start sucking on the university fed tit and getting the whole thing way out of context as he does not read primary texts and cannot critique what he hears. Similar to those uni idiots above who at least are reading the primary texts...

And so he becomes a usful idiot for the BLM and their (nigger lover) supporters.

Meanwhile in Africa neck lacing goes on unabated and no one gives a shit...

I don't support blm and I'm far from an indoctrinated troll. I support gun rights and the U.S constitution. I support the gay and lesbian sex changes and gender b.s. But what I will say is atleast blm stands for something and they are united. What can white people say these days? What do white people stand for? They are an embarrassment to my race. Black people turn it up and aren't a bunch of scared little pussies. They fight and they put fear in the government. White congressman and politicians and police officers and even the judges and president opress us and white people don't do shit about it. If don't stand for something you'll fall for anything.

 

[14ZombiE88]

Live now

 

[Vwj]

 

[wiggins]

You don't know what a lame is? Lol now that's funny. You've seen star ships burning off the cusp of Orion and you can't tell that geroge Floyd was murdered? Here let me speak in your native language your a uneducated retard. Can you understand what that means? Google it if your still struggling.

Post automatically merged: Nov 17, 2021

I don't support blm and I'm far from an indoctrinated troll. I support gun rights and the U.S constitution. I support the gay and lesbian sex changes and gender b.s. But what I will say is atleast blm stands for something and they are united. What can white people say these days? What do white people stand for? They are an embarrassment to my race. Black people turn it up and aren't a bunch of scared little pussies. They fight and they put fear in the government. White congressman and politicians and police officers and even the judges and president opress us and white people don't do shit about it. If don't stand for something you'll fall for anything.

Little Johny you're more messed up than I thought.

'I support the gay and lesbian sex changes'. Well, that's just dandy. Do you also support people who have apotemnophilia? And if so why? Why do you support the gay and lesbian sex changes? If indeed the sentence even makes sense.

'White people are an embarrassment to my race'. Well, gosh, golly.
'If don't stand for something you'll fall for anything'. Well, ditto. Non sensical sentence by the way.

'What do white people stand for?' White people stand for gettting things done and keeping the cities lights on and the sewage flowing and clean drinking water comming in. And a the lions share of law and order, emergency services, the US military, the hospitals, the dams, etc etc etc.

I can assure you that BLM puts the fear into no one. The left like to pat it on the head for woke points but its a bastard child really. It actually stands for nothing. It bleats a lot using buzz words like 'systemic racism'; 'unconcious bias' and so on but no one really gives a shit. The woke will fuck a few black people for pollitical reasons and their friends will say 'well, Siouxy, no one can call you racist' and she'll preen herself that she's so right on...

So fuck off to victim land little J and leave us alone please...

Post automatically merged: Nov 17, 2021

You don't know what a lame is? Lol now that's funny. You've seen star ships burning off the cusp of Orion and you can't tell that geroge Floyd was murdered? Here let me speak in your native language your a uneducated retard. Can you understand what that means? Google it if your still struggling.

Post automatically merged: Nov 17, 2021

I don't support blm and I'm far from an indoctrinated troll. I support gun rights and the U.S constitution. I support the gay and lesbian sex changes and gender b.s. But what I will say is atleast blm stands for something and they are united. What can white people say these days? What do white people stand for? They are an embarrassment to my race. Black people turn it up and aren't a bunch of scared little pussies. They fight and they put fear in the government. White congressman and politicians and police officers and even the judges and president opress us and white people don't do shit about it. If don't stand for something you'll fall for anything.

What white people stand for:

• The Enlightenment
• The age of exploration
• inventing the chronograph and Greenwich mean time and thus world navigation
• Inventing the railways
• inventing aircraft
• inventing the car
• the industrial revolution
• the heart transplant
• the space program
• the world of literature
• inventing the dictionary
• inventing the computer
• etc etc etc

A shorter list would be what white people dont stand for...

What black people stand for:

• BLM
• Ebonics
• inventing the perfect victim
• inventing 'systemic racism'
• Disco
• Motown
• Doing time
• The single mother family
• Dindu's
• Endless systemic, formulaic whining

 

[Vwj]

 

[mojo_throws]

You don't know what a lame is? Lol now that's funny. You've seen star ships burning off the cusp of Orion and you can't tell that geroge Floyd was murdered? Here let me speak in your native language your a uneducated retard. Can you understand what that means? Google it if your still struggling.

Post automatically merged: Nov 17, 2021

I don't support blm and I'm far from an indoctrinated troll. I support gun rights and the U.S constitution. I support the gay and lesbian sex changes and gender b.s. But what I will say is atleast blm stands for something and they are united. What can white people say these days? What do white people stand for? They are an embarrassment to my race. Black people turn it up and aren't a bunch of scared little pussies. They fight and they put fear in the government. White congressman and politicians and police officers and even the judges and president opress us and white people don't do shit about it. If don't stand for something you'll fall for anything.

Whites are cucks that is true. From leaders to cucks. Yellow ppl are true chads now

 

[HG]

This an angry thread - everyone is all riled up - not me tho...

 

[Johnnyboy27290]

Rittenhouse prosecution shoots from the hip​

Amber Athey

YouTube





Amber Athey

16 November 2021

3:01 PM

There are three basic rules of gun safety: always keep your firearm pointed in a safe direction, always keep it unloaded until you’re ready to use, and never put your finger on the trigger until you’re ready to shoot. Thomas Binger, the lead prosecutor in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, violated two of those three rules in the courtroom Monday.
Binger, who has built most of his case on Rittenhouse’s decision to carry a rifle to the Kenosha riots last summer, pointed a rifle at the crowded courtroom with his finger directly on the trigger. It was a stunning bookend to the prosecution’s fantastical argument against Rittenhouse, and the latest reminder that those who wish to take away your right to defend yourself with firearms know next to nothing about them.
Binger held up the rifle as a demonstration; he alleged that Rittenhouse pointed his gun at another rioter prior to shooting Joseph Rosenbaum. According to Binger’s version of events, Rittenhouse “provoked” the violence against him, while the rioters who attacked him were “heroes” trying to stop an active shooter.
Binger’s claim that Rittenhouse pointed his gun at other rioters before Rosenbaum rests on grainy drone footage “enhanced” by a forensic imaging specialist. The specialist admitted that he did not compare the zoomed-in version of the video to the original. He also testified that new pixels will be added to enlarged images, thus undermining their accuracy. The footage was so dubious that the judge was reticent to even allow it into evidence. Most importantly, Binger did not call those he claims were at the end of Rittenhouse’s gun to testify.
Most of Binger’s earlier arguments were even more brazen, undermining the basic right to self defense.


“You lose the right to self-defense when you’re the one who brought the gun,” Binger said at one point Monday, suggesting that merely carrying a firearm constitutes a direct threat to others. This not only flies in the face of the Second Amendment, but by such logic, those in the courtroom would have been justified in rushing Binger when he pointed a rifle in their direction during his closing argument.
In questioning Rittenhouse during his testimony last week, Binger intentionally blurred the lines between being an aggressor and a victim. He argued that Rittenhouse had no reason to be afraid of Rosenbaum because he had a weapon and Rosenbaum did not. Rosenbaum, Binger claimed, was the one acting in self-defense because a gun was pointed at him. The video evidence, however, shows that Rittenhouse was retreating and Rosenbaum was chasing. If Rosenbaum was only trying to protect himself, he almost certainly would have stopped his advance when Rittenhouse raised his rifle. Instead, he lunged for Rittenhouse’s weapon.
Binger attempted the same argument on behalf of Anthony Huber, the man who assaulted Rittenhouse with a skateboard, and Gaige Grosskreutz, who pointed a handgun at Rittenhouse’s head. Rittenhouse was retreating and verbalized that he was going to the police when rioters struck him in the head, knocking him to the ground. It was then, when he could no longer run away, that Huber and Grosskreutz attacked him. Still, Binger claimed that Rittenhouse shouldn’t have feared for his life because he had a rifle against Huber’s skateboard and Grosskreutz’s handgun.
Yes, Binger actually argued in a court of law that you may not defend yourself if your attacker has a physically smaller weapon than you.
Binger’s standard for self-defense would lead to open season on gun owners. The logical conclusion of his argument is that any time someone carries a firearm, even legally, those around him are justified in assuming that he is an active shooter and reacting accordingly. The gun owner would then be forbidden from protecting himself because those who attacked him were acting in “self-defense.”
This was not the only absurd line of reasoning about firearms followed by Binger. He argued that Rittenhouse should not have been in fear of his weapon being taken by Rosenbaum because he was wearing a rifle sling, the purpose of which is to prevent disarmament. Rittenhouse testified that the sling’s purpose that night was to keep his hands free so he could render medical aid to the injured. Hunters regularly use slings to prevent fatigue when carrying heavy rifles long distances. Even so, could Rittenhouse have reasonably depended on a cheap rifle sling to save his life in the split second that Rosenbaum tried to snatch his weapon?
Judge Schroeder stepped in on Monday to dismiss one of the more obviously bunk gun charges the state brought against Rittenhouse, confirming that 17-year-olds are legally allowed to carry long guns in Wisconsin. This was a major blow to Binger’s case as it undermined the notion that Rittenhouse was acting recklessly or illegally before he was attacked.
The jury in the Rittenhouse trial will start deliberations on Tuesday. The stakes are high. The prosecution has made sure that this is not just about a teenage boy’s life, but about the basic right to self-defense and to bear arms. If the jury decides that the act of carrying a firearm nullifies your right to protect yourself, gun owners everywhere better look out.

Post automatically merged: Nov 16, 2021

Johnnyboy has proven beyond doubt he is a troll.
BLM does stand for something: Being a Lame Masterbater.
What little Johnnyboy does not understand is that he is caught up in something that was cooked up in the humanities departments of universities where PHD candidates were racking their brains trying to think up a thesis subject. It's all increadibly exciting at uni when you first get there.
All sorts of radical new ideas that are so convincing. You can actually change the world!! Wow!!

And so you start to specialise and read up on race theory and read only about injustices and speak only to your other uni buddies who are reading the same thing and go to lectures and hear experts putting forward cogitant arguments that add to the bleak picture and next thing you know you're screwing the hot chick with dread locks who prasises your wokeness and you go on a few marches...

Your whole world view is now an echo chamber. So you write your thesis, get your PHD, settle down as an academic. Start to think its all actually bullshitt but you cant speak out because you don't have tenure.

And the trickle down effect is that functional illiterates like little johny here start sucking on the university fed tit and getting the whole thing way out of context as he does not read primary texts and cannot critique what he hears. Similar to those uni idiots above who at least are reading the primary texts...

And so he becomes a usful idiot for the BLM and their (nigger lover) supporters.

Meanwhile in Africa neck lacing goes on unabated and no one gives a shit...

And even more to the point the the second amendment was originally formed to protect us from a tyrannical government and a rogue and communist regime. Which is obviously happening right now. How many of you "NIGGER" haters on here are gonna raise your arms and fight for your freedoms and rights? NONE. your a bunch of shit talking pussy who don't even own firearms. You deserve to be a slave and be someone's bitch. Pussies. Scared to death.

Let's forget for a second the absurdity that I would be jogging down the street with an AR15. What if he was walking down the street with a machete and he killed two people who tried to disarm him. And don't tell me it's different because it's unlawful to carry a machete. Your argument is valid only in the microverse of the altercation. If you zoom out and see the big picture the question becomes why did he go there? Maybe he wasn't going to start anything but he was sure the hell going to finish it.

Now, little Johny, how about putting that in English if thats not too much trouble.

I have no idea whatsoever what "Your a lame too obvious" means.

And as to 'never done nothing never seen nothing' (with no commas, so wrong...) I have seen star ships burning off the cusp of orion and all that...

So, Wrong! again...

Are you speaking ebonics?

Let's forget for a second the absurdity that I would be jogging down the street with an AR15. What if he was walking down the street with a machete and he killed two people who tried to disarm him. And don't tell me it's different because it's unlawful to carry a machete. Your argument is valid only in the microverse of the altercation. If you zoom out and see the big picture the question becomes why did he go there? Maybe he wasn't going to start anything but he was sure the hell going to finish it.

Well what are you gonna do? NOTHING. You don't even own a firearm.

guns are just for pussies not able to bump their fists


mimimi marry your gun if you love it that much hahaha americans so fny

"Can't live without my gun, look I am John Wayne BOOM BOOM,
yeah who is the tuff boy here??"

🖕🏿🖕🏾🖕

hahahaha

Pussies. Don't even own a firearm.

Little Johny you're more messed up than I thought.

'I support the gay and lesbian sex changes'. Well, that's just dandy. Do you also support people who have apotemnophilia? And if so why? Why do you support the gay and lesbian sex changes? If indeed the sentence even makes sense.

'White people are an embarrassment to my race'. Well, gosh, golly.
'If don't stand for something you'll fall for anything'. Well, ditto. Non sensical sentence by the way.

'What do white people stand for?' White people stand for gettting things done and keeping the cities lights on and the sewage flowing and clean drinking water comming in. And a the lions share of law and order, emergency services, the US military, the hospitals, the dams, etc etc etc.

I can assure you that BLM puts the fear into no one. The left like to pat it on the head for woke points but its a bastard child really. It actually stands for nothing. It bleats a lot using buzz words like 'systemic racism'; 'unconcious bias' and so on but no one really gives a shit. The woke will fuck a few black people for pollitical reasons and their friends will say 'well, Siouxy, no one can call you racist' and she'll preen herself that she's so right on...

So fuck off to victim land little J and leave us alone please...

Post automatically merged: Nov 17, 2021

What white people stand for:

• The Enlightenment
• The age of exploration
• inventing the chronograph and Greenwich mean time and thus world navigation
• Inventing the railways
• inventing aircraft
• inventing the car
• the industrial revolution
• the heart transplant
• the space program
• the world of literature
• inventing the dictionary
• inventing the computer
• etc etc etc

A shorter list would be what white people dont stand for...

What black people stand for:

• BLM
• Ebonics
• inventing the perfect victim
• inventing 'systemic racism'
• Disco
• Motown
• Doing time
• The single mother family
• Dindu's
• Endless systemic, formulaic whining

Post automatically merged: Nov 17, 2021

And even more to the point the the second amendment was originally formed to protect us from a tyrannical government and a rogue and communist regime. Which is obviously happening right now. How many of you "NIGGER" haters on here are gonna raise your arms and fight for your freedoms and rights? NONE. your a bunch of shit talking pussy who don't even own firearms. You deserve to be a slave and be someone's bitch. Pussies. Scared to death.




Well what are you gonna do? NOTHING. You don't even own a firearm.

Pussies. Don't even own a firearm.

Good comeback.

 

[Guipago]

Rittenhouse prosecution shoots from the hip​

Amber Athey

YouTube





Amber Athey

16 November 2021

3:01 PM

There are three basic rules of gun safety: always keep your firearm pointed in a safe direction, always keep it unloaded until you’re ready to use, and never put your finger on the trigger until you’re ready to shoot. Thomas Binger, the lead prosecutor in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, violated two of those three rules in the courtroom Monday.
Binger, who has built most of his case on Rittenhouse’s decision to carry a rifle to the Kenosha riots last summer, pointed a rifle at the crowded courtroom with his finger directly on the trigger. It was a stunning bookend to the prosecution’s fantastical argument against Rittenhouse, and the latest reminder that those who wish to take away your right to defend yourself with firearms know next to nothing about them.
Binger held up the rifle as a demonstration; he alleged that Rittenhouse pointed his gun at another rioter prior to shooting Joseph Rosenbaum. According to Binger’s version of events, Rittenhouse “provoked” the violence against him, while the rioters who attacked him were “heroes” trying to stop an active shooter.
Binger’s claim that Rittenhouse pointed his gun at other rioters before Rosenbaum rests on grainy drone footage “enhanced” by a forensic imaging specialist. The specialist admitted that he did not compare the zoomed-in version of the video to the original. He also testified that new pixels will be added to enlarged images, thus undermining their accuracy. The footage was so dubious that the judge was reticent to even allow it into evidence. Most importantly, Binger did not call those he claims were at the end of Rittenhouse’s gun to testify.
Most of Binger’s earlier arguments were even more brazen, undermining the basic right to self defense.


“You lose the right to self-defense when you’re the one who brought the gun,” Binger said at one point Monday, suggesting that merely carrying a firearm constitutes a direct threat to others. This not only flies in the face of the Second Amendment, but by such logic, those in the courtroom would have been justified in rushing Binger when he pointed a rifle in their direction during his closing argument.
In questioning Rittenhouse during his testimony last week, Binger intentionally blurred the lines between being an aggressor and a victim. He argued that Rittenhouse had no reason to be afraid of Rosenbaum because he had a weapon and Rosenbaum did not. Rosenbaum, Binger claimed, was the one acting in self-defense because a gun was pointed at him. The video evidence, however, shows that Rittenhouse was retreating and Rosenbaum was chasing. If Rosenbaum was only trying to protect himself, he almost certainly would have stopped his advance when Rittenhouse raised his rifle. Instead, he lunged for Rittenhouse’s weapon.
Binger attempted the same argument on behalf of Anthony Huber, the man who assaulted Rittenhouse with a skateboard, and Gaige Grosskreutz, who pointed a handgun at Rittenhouse’s head. Rittenhouse was retreating and verbalized that he was going to the police when rioters struck him in the head, knocking him to the ground. It was then, when he could no longer run away, that Huber and Grosskreutz attacked him. Still, Binger claimed that Rittenhouse shouldn’t have feared for his life because he had a rifle against Huber’s skateboard and Grosskreutz’s handgun.
Yes, Binger actually argued in a court of law that you may not defend yourself if your attacker has a physically smaller weapon than you.
Binger’s standard for self-defense would lead to open season on gun owners. The logical conclusion of his argument is that any time someone carries a firearm, even legally, those around him are justified in assuming that he is an active shooter and reacting accordingly. The gun owner would then be forbidden from protecting himself because those who attacked him were acting in “self-defense.”
This was not the only absurd line of reasoning about firearms followed by Binger. He argued that Rittenhouse should not have been in fear of his weapon being taken by Rosenbaum because he was wearing a rifle sling, the purpose of which is to prevent disarmament. Rittenhouse testified that the sling’s purpose that night was to keep his hands free so he could render medical aid to the injured. Hunters regularly use slings to prevent fatigue when carrying heavy rifles long distances. Even so, could Rittenhouse have reasonably depended on a cheap rifle sling to save his life in the split second that Rosenbaum tried to snatch his weapon?
Judge Schroeder stepped in on Monday to dismiss one of the more obviously bunk gun charges the state brought against Rittenhouse, confirming that 17-year-olds are legally allowed to carry long guns in Wisconsin. This was a major blow to Binger’s case as it undermined the notion that Rittenhouse was acting recklessly or illegally before he was attacked.
The jury in the Rittenhouse trial will start deliberations on Tuesday. The stakes are high. The prosecution has made sure that this is not just about a teenage boy’s life, but about the basic right to self-defense and to bear arms. If the jury decides that the act of carrying a firearm nullifies your right to protect yourself, gun owners everywhere better look out.

Post automatically merged: Nov 16, 2021

Johnnyboy has proven beyond doubt he is a troll.
BLM does stand for something: Being a Lame Masterbater.
What little Johnnyboy does not understand is that he is caught up in something that was cooked up in the humanities departments of universities where PHD candidates were racking their brains trying to think up a thesis subject. It's all increadibly exciting at uni when you first get there.
All sorts of radical new ideas that are so convincing. You can actually change the world!! Wow!!

And so you start to specialise and read up on race theory and read only about injustices and speak only to your other uni buddies who are reading the same thing and go to lectures and hear experts putting forward cogitant arguments that add to the bleak picture and next thing you know you're screwing the hot chick with dread locks who prasises your wokeness and you go on a few marches...

Your whole world view is now an echo chamber. So you write your thesis, get your PHD, settle down as an academic. Start to think its all actually bullshitt but you cant speak out because you don't have tenure.

And the trickle down effect is that functional illiterates like little johny here start sucking on the university fed tit and getting the whole thing way out of context as he does not read primary texts and cannot critique what he hears. Similar to those uni idiots above who at least are reading the primary texts...

And so he becomes a usful idiot for the BLM and their (nigger lover) supporters.

Meanwhile in Africa neck lacing goes on unabated and no one gives a shit...

The prosecution is purposely fucking this up, the defence lawyer should be all over those statements.

 

[Götterdämmerung]

Well what are you gonna do? NOTHING. You don't even own a firearm.

Your logic is unassailable.

 

[wiggins]

Whites are cucks that is true. From leaders to cucks. Yellow ppl are true chads now

The only blameless ones are the blacks, and their nigger lover white apologists. (who should really be referred to as race traitors).

You two (mojo and johny boy) are blow in's who troll for a while and then fuck off to attempt to create drama elsewhere.

Your language puts you at age 14. What the fuck is a chad? Or a cuck?

English is so much easier to understand than this baby ghetto text speak ebonic shit you keep using. no sense in seeking to upset someone and not able to because they cant understnad the ramblings of an illierate.

 

[mrln]

hes from illinois. what he doing wisconsin? visiting relatives? with an assault rifle? i think not.
he was looking for trouble,imo.