It certainly pays to be an honorary member of the FAG...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you are under 18 you are not permitted to submit personal information to us or use this website. If discovered you will be banned.
We will ban and report anyone posting illegal content.
We will ban any forum user who breaks our terms.
Freedom of speech should be wide open as long as it doesn't incite violence.
We have a 15 year old thriving community here with 400,000+ members and hundreds of people online at any given moment, we encourage you to join!, there are 1000's of topics to discuss. Please be aware before registering and read our terms of service and privacy policy.
By dismissing this notice and proceeding, you agree to the above.
That Baldwin case would set a bad precedent in that the executive director or actor in a scene is responsible for the load in a firearm being used in a movie or TV show. It doesn't matter who he pointed it at either, it's a common practice.The Jews thing is ridiculous so I’m just gonna move past that. Maybe the prosecution want to “throw the book at him” but also maybe it was the woman’s family really pressuring the authorities and just wanting someone to be held responsible. Who knows…
Holy shit, you're talking sense for once. Keep this up, I might start paying attention to you again.It's always the Jews, Eric.
This case was bullshit, when has it ever been an executive producers job - or any actor for that matter- to personally inspect a handed-off firearm from a professional armorer to determine the difference between a live round and a blank?
Case closed.
Well look at that. I actually agree with you for once in your miserable life. Huh. Amazing.

Yea who knows dude but I don’t think she deserved it, it was clearly a mistake but sometimes accidents or mistakes results in your own death.That Baldwin case would set a bad precedent in that the executive director or actor in a scene is responsible for the load in a firearm being used in a movie or TV show. It doesn't matter who he pointed it at either, it's a common practice.
The armorer provided the gun and the ammo and used her professional judgement as a firearms expert which is trusted enough for an insurance company to cover her. She loaded it. She said it was safe. Clearly this woman fucked up big time and she deserves what she got. I'm sure a jury of retarded people would find Alex guilty too but I'm also sure he'd win on appeal, because at the end of the day, it's not his job to be the firearms expert.