Kyle Rittenhouse acquitted on all charges (2 Viewers)
- Thread starter D.O.A.
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
Vwj
NewbieX
No what started this mess was a black man who sexually assaulted his ex then went on to abduct their child and try to steal her car, then fought with police when they tried to arrest him then reached into the car after being told not to
Götterdämmerung
Well Known Member
I don't know but it's in the World News section so it must be pretty big.
I don't believe I ever said he was guilty. I said each charge would have to be looked at individually from the very start. I blame the prosecutor because he was awful at showing Kyle's violent tendencies, establishing a violent intention, and not being smart enough to break an 18 year old during cross.
My thoughts fault? wtf does that mean numpty? You and the meter man are so emotionally invested in America it's pathetic.
He only said he wanted to be a nurse because that plays well on the stand. He's not smart enough to be a nurse, he didn't even finish high school. The charge for the photographer that was nearly struck constitutes reckless endangerment.
He wasn't a police explorer, his mom put him in a program because he was a bit of a loser. Like his Dad, Kyle's also been violent. Dad has even spent time in prison for abusing mom, who coincidently has also been arrested for assault. Kyle's going to be a great cop. lol
Last edited:
Grand Mal Caesar
1984+Idiocracy=Reality
They didn't lose due to incompetence. They were outright vindictive and malicious. The only way they could have won this case was by intimidation, lying, the media's lies and threats of rioting. No chance in Hell that they could have pulled off a legitimate win.
You're so ignorant and full of shit.
Last edited:
You're so fat and full of fat.
I believe I said something like he deserved big black prison cock. lol I didn't believe OJ was innocent, he just had better lawyers.
i love you very much.You're so fat and full of fat.
I believe I said something like he deserved big black prison cock. lol I didn't believe OJ was innocent, he just had better lawyers.
Wombo_Combo
registered sex defender
View attachment 557297
Moment Rittenhouse verdict read out
Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted on all charges for shootings that killed two men and injured a third during last year’s violence in Kenosha, Wisconsin.www.news.com.au
Zerotwo from darling in the franxx. I don't know where that specific image came from though.
Last edited:
wiggins
Forum Veteran
In Aus the ABC covered the verdict in their ususal way. IE 'its a terrible indictment on USA and it its systemic racism' etc. Or thats how i read it.
For your possible enjoyment I include it below.
Biden waded into it of course, saying how the verdict angered him etc. The rule of law when not supported by the Commander In Chief is really at risk...
I'll be curious to see what the Squad have to say, along with the VP. Also, how long it will take for the first riots to occure as they appear sure to follow such dog whistles...
Here's the ABC (our CNN) article:
The moment Kyle Rittenhouse collapses after not guilty verdict is read
Share this article
As the last of five "not guilty" verdicts was read aloud, Kyle Rittenhouse shook with sobs and collapsed, nearly falling out of sight of the television camera fixed on him in a Wisconsin courtroom.
It was instantly the defining image of the 18-year-old's murder trial, which became such a subject of passionate debate about guns and justice that major broadcast and cable news networks set aside regular programming to reveal the jury's decision.
There was no shortage of strong opinions in the verdict's wake.
"I knew this case was big," Mr Rittenhouse's lawyer, Mark Richards, said after the trial during a news conference carried live by cable news networks.
Gun control advocates warn the jury's verdict could inspire a new wave of armed vigilantism.(AP: Ringo HW Chiu)
"I never knew it was going to be this big," he said.
Demonstrators gathered in a number of US cities, including Kenosha, Los Angeles, New York and Oakland, to protest against the verdict.
"[We're feeling] real anger and devastation about the fact that young black men, young black boys like Trayvon Martin, are shot dead because they are carrying around Skittles and someone like Rittenhouse is not guilty in all verdicts when he shot two people and went across state lines and used a violent weapon to murder people," Natalia Marques, a protester in New York, said.
"I mean, it's just it's absurd to me and it really reveals how broken the system is."
Civil rights advocates say the verdict would have been different if the shooter was black.(Reuters: David Dee Delgado)
Gun control advocates warned the jury's verdict could inspire a new wave of armed vigilantism, after Mr Rittenhouse — armed with an AR-15-style rifle — travelled in August 2020 from his Illinois home to Kenosha after demonstrations erupted following the police shooting of black man Jacob Blake.
The shootings took place during the third night unrest in Kenosha, Wisconsin.
US President Joe Biden said he would "stand by" the jury's decision to acquit Mr Rittenhouse.
"While the verdict in Kenosha will leave many Americans feeling angry and concerned, myself included, we must acknowledge that the jury has spoken," Mr Biden said in a statement.
Guns have long been a potent political issue in the United States, where permissive laws have led to the highest rate of civilian firearm ownership in the world.
Mass shootings, which are far more rare in other wealthy nations, have plagued the country for decades.
Mr Rittenhouse's decision, at age 17, to roam the streets of Kenosha toting a weapon in the name of protecting private property from rioters struck a particular nerve about just how far gun rights should extend.
Judge Bruce Schroeder dismissed all charges after the jury's verdict was announced in court.
"As the tragic events on that night in August showed, a 17-year-old arming himself with an AR-15 makes no-one safer," top officials at Giffords, the gun safety group, said in a statement.
Within minutes of the verdict, the National Rifle Association (NRA) tweeted the Second Amendment, which speaks of the right to keep and bear arms.
Brandon Lesco, who was standing outside the Kenosha courthouse holding a "Free Kyle!" sign, said the verdict was just.
"Someone needs to be there to defend the American towns that people try to burn. I respect that he was there, I respect he carried a weapon, he used it properly, he used it legally. The jurors agree," said Mr Lesco.
The trial judge earlier this week had dismissed a misdemeanour charge against Mr Rittenhouse for illegally possessing the rifle he used in the shootings, citing vagueness in the law.
US congressman Madison Cawthorn, a Republican representative from North Carolina, said on Instagram: "Kyle Rittenhouse is not guilty my friends. You have a right to defend yourselves. Be armed, be dangerous and be moral."
Congressman Paul Gosar suggested that he would offer Mr Rittenhouse an internship.
Former Wisconsin governor Scott Walker said on Twitter the verdict was no surprise.
Some commentators sought to separate that debate from the mechanics of the trial.
"You were seeing this play out in America online in a very different way than it played out in court, when you were watching every single detail," said Sara Sidner, a CNN reporter.
The US has the highest rate of civilian gun ownership in the world.(AP: Noah Berger)
Civil rights lawyer Ben Crump tweeted that the outcome "would be starkly different" if the shooter was a black man.
Former Democratic presidential candidate Julian Castro agreed, voicing his opinion on Twitter.
“You know damn well that if Kyle Rittenhouse were Black he would have been found guilty in a heartbeat – or shot dead by cops on the scene," he wrote.
Kyle Rittenhouse has been found not guilty of homicide after shooting dead two men and injuring a third at a Black Lives Matter protest. The question at the centre of his trial: Was it self defence?
Read more
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People president and CEO Derrick Johnson tweeted that the trial was "a reminder of the treacherous role that white supremacy and privilege play within our justice system".
The Black Voters Matter Group tweeted: "Disappointed but not surprised. This is not justice. This is not accountability. However, this is America."
Mr Rittenhouse's acquittal created fear that protesters against racial injustice and other causes would be in danger from right-wing causes that already deemed Mr Rittenhouse a hero after the shootings.
The Reverend Jesse Jackson, the longtime civil rights leader and activist, said the verdict suggested "it's open season on human rights demonstrators".
The shooting left Mr Blake paralysed from the waist down.(Twitter: Ben Crump)
"The concern over this verdict is compounded by the fact that [Jacob] Blake, who was originally the issue, was shot by a policeman seven times in the back," Reverend Jackson said.
"He's in a wheelchair today, paralysed forever. And that policeman is walking the streets of Kenosha, on the force today."
ABC/wires
Posted 5h ago5 hours ago, updated 3h ago3 hours ago
Share
19k retweets so the her views are rapidly circulating.
Riots are comming...
What we are witnessing is a system functioning as designed and protecting those it was designed for. My heart still breaks for the communities and families whose grief now compounds, and the countless others who will be denied and deprived in similar scenes across the country.
6:48 am · 20 Nov 2021·Twitter for iPhone
19.3K
Retweets
921
Quote Tweets
126.4K
Likes
For your possible enjoyment I include it below.
Biden waded into it of course, saying how the verdict angered him etc. The rule of law when not supported by the Commander In Chief is really at risk...
I'll be curious to see what the Squad have to say, along with the VP. Also, how long it will take for the first riots to occure as they appear sure to follow such dog whistles...
Here's the ABC (our CNN) article:
Kyle Rittenhouse acquittal spurs strong reactions from both sides of the US gun debate
Posted 5h ago5 hours agoThe moment Kyle Rittenhouse collapses after not guilty verdict is read
Share this article
As the last of five "not guilty" verdicts was read aloud, Kyle Rittenhouse shook with sobs and collapsed, nearly falling out of sight of the television camera fixed on him in a Wisconsin courtroom.
Key points:
- Conservatives hailed Mr Rittenhouse as a hero for exercising his right to self-defence
- Gun control advocates warned the verdict could inspire a new wave of armed vigilantism
- Mass shootings have plagued the United States for decades
It was instantly the defining image of the 18-year-old's murder trial, which became such a subject of passionate debate about guns and justice that major broadcast and cable news networks set aside regular programming to reveal the jury's decision.
There was no shortage of strong opinions in the verdict's wake.
"I knew this case was big," Mr Rittenhouse's lawyer, Mark Richards, said after the trial during a news conference carried live by cable news networks.
Gun control advocates warn the jury's verdict could inspire a new wave of armed vigilantism.(AP: Ringo HW Chiu)
"I never knew it was going to be this big," he said.
Demonstrators gathered in a number of US cities, including Kenosha, Los Angeles, New York and Oakland, to protest against the verdict.
"[We're feeling] real anger and devastation about the fact that young black men, young black boys like Trayvon Martin, are shot dead because they are carrying around Skittles and someone like Rittenhouse is not guilty in all verdicts when he shot two people and went across state lines and used a violent weapon to murder people," Natalia Marques, a protester in New York, said.
"I mean, it's just it's absurd to me and it really reveals how broken the system is."
Civil rights advocates say the verdict would have been different if the shooter was black.(Reuters: David Dee Delgado)
President Biden says he will 'stand by' jury's decision
American conservatives hailed Mr Rittenhouse as a hero for exercising his right to self-defence when he fatally shot two demonstrators and wounded a third who he said attacked him last year at a racial justice protest in Kenosha, Wisconsin.Gun control advocates warned the jury's verdict could inspire a new wave of armed vigilantism, after Mr Rittenhouse — armed with an AR-15-style rifle — travelled in August 2020 from his Illinois home to Kenosha after demonstrations erupted following the police shooting of black man Jacob Blake.
The shootings took place during the third night unrest in Kenosha, Wisconsin.
US President Joe Biden said he would "stand by" the jury's decision to acquit Mr Rittenhouse.
"While the verdict in Kenosha will leave many Americans feeling angry and concerned, myself included, we must acknowledge that the jury has spoken," Mr Biden said in a statement.
Guns have long been a potent political issue in the United States, where permissive laws have led to the highest rate of civilian firearm ownership in the world.
Mass shootings, which are far more rare in other wealthy nations, have plagued the country for decades.
Mr Rittenhouse's decision, at age 17, to roam the streets of Kenosha toting a weapon in the name of protecting private property from rioters struck a particular nerve about just how far gun rights should extend.
Judge Bruce Schroeder dismissed all charges after the jury's verdict was announced in court.
"As the tragic events on that night in August showed, a 17-year-old arming himself with an AR-15 makes no-one safer," top officials at Giffords, the gun safety group, said in a statement.
Gun rights organisations and Rittenhouse supporters celebrated the outcome as a major victory.
Within minutes of the verdict, the National Rifle Association (NRA) tweeted the Second Amendment, which speaks of the right to keep and bear arms.
Brandon Lesco, who was standing outside the Kenosha courthouse holding a "Free Kyle!" sign, said the verdict was just.
"Someone needs to be there to defend the American towns that people try to burn. I respect that he was there, I respect he carried a weapon, he used it properly, he used it legally. The jurors agree," said Mr Lesco.
The trial judge earlier this week had dismissed a misdemeanour charge against Mr Rittenhouse for illegally possessing the rifle he used in the shootings, citing vagueness in the law.
US congressman Madison Cawthorn, a Republican representative from North Carolina, said on Instagram: "Kyle Rittenhouse is not guilty my friends. You have a right to defend yourselves. Be armed, be dangerous and be moral."
Congressman Paul Gosar suggested that he would offer Mr Rittenhouse an internship.
Former Wisconsin governor Scott Walker said on Twitter the verdict was no surprise.
Some commentators sought to separate that debate from the mechanics of the trial.
"You were seeing this play out in America online in a very different way than it played out in court, when you were watching every single detail," said Sara Sidner, a CNN reporter.
The US has the highest rate of civilian gun ownership in the world.(AP: Noah Berger)
'Open season on human rights demonstrators'
Mr Rittenhouse's shooting of three people made him either a vigilante who was out to make trouble or a young man who defended himself from a mob, depending upon an observer's perspective.Civil rights lawyer Ben Crump tweeted that the outcome "would be starkly different" if the shooter was a black man.
Former Democratic presidential candidate Julian Castro agreed, voicing his opinion on Twitter.
“You know damn well that if Kyle Rittenhouse were Black he would have been found guilty in a heartbeat – or shot dead by cops on the scene," he wrote.
Was the Kyle Rittenhouse case self-defence?
Kyle Rittenhouse has been found not guilty of homicide after shooting dead two men and injuring a third at a Black Lives Matter protest. The question at the centre of his trial: Was it self defence?
Read more
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People president and CEO Derrick Johnson tweeted that the trial was "a reminder of the treacherous role that white supremacy and privilege play within our justice system".
The Black Voters Matter Group tweeted: "Disappointed but not surprised. This is not justice. This is not accountability. However, this is America."
Mr Rittenhouse's acquittal created fear that protesters against racial injustice and other causes would be in danger from right-wing causes that already deemed Mr Rittenhouse a hero after the shootings.
The Reverend Jesse Jackson, the longtime civil rights leader and activist, said the verdict suggested "it's open season on human rights demonstrators".
The shooting left Mr Blake paralysed from the waist down.(Twitter: Ben Crump)
"The concern over this verdict is compounded by the fact that [Jacob] Blake, who was originally the issue, was shot by a policeman seven times in the back," Reverend Jackson said.
"He's in a wheelchair today, paralysed forever. And that policeman is walking the streets of Kenosha, on the force today."
ABC/wires
Posted 5h ago5 hours ago, updated 3h ago3 hours ago
Share
19k retweets so the her views are rapidly circulating.
Riots are comming...
What we are witnessing is a system functioning as designed and protecting those it was designed for. My heart still breaks for the communities and families whose grief now compounds, and the countless others who will be denied and deprived in similar scenes across the country.
6:48 am · 20 Nov 2021·Twitter for iPhone
19.3K
Retweets
921
Quote Tweets
126.4K
Likes
Last edited:
I hope he sues the hell out everyone. Just hearing these liberal networks-CNN, MSNBC, ABC, that piece of shit Nadler, scum Biden, that sheboon Joy Reid and all them.
And they still keep lying saying he carried the AR-15 across state lines, they keep
Saying the gun was illegal, they keep saying he couldn’t legally possess it, keep saying he’s a white supremist, keep saying Grosskritz or whatever the hell his name is never pointed his gun at Kyle and the fucker testified he did and that when Kyle shot him….just lie after lie from these scum.
And they still keep lying saying he carried the AR-15 across state lines, they keep
Saying the gun was illegal, they keep saying he couldn’t legally possess it, keep saying he’s a white supremist, keep saying Grosskritz or whatever the hell his name is never pointed his gun at Kyle and the fucker testified he did and that when Kyle shot him….just lie after lie from these scum.
Last edited by a moderator:
🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂
Occasionaly this system still works.
Go figure .
Occasionaly this system still works.
Go figure .
Smooby
Retard Extraordinaire
They won't stop making it about race. So much so that other countries are reporting that Kyle killed two black men. They also keep saying if Kyle was a black man this wouldn't have been the outcome, yet a young niglet spent only one day in jail after bringing a gun to school and deliberately shooting people.. because he was bullied. THIS FUCKING WORLD
Vwj
NewbieX
It is about race, the only black man to be videoed assaulting Kyle didn’t testify, why? Because the DA wouldn’t give him immunity, so the prosecution didn’t tell the defence his details, he’s a career criminal, with a open case of domestic violence (threw his girlfriend to the floor then kicked her in the ribs, seems to have a habit of that eh?)
STFU CUNT
You should drink more you fat fuck. If you're lucky the heart attack will kill you quick otherwise you'll be a drooling quadraplegic in state care.
I'd love to take a nice wet beer shit , RIGHT ON YOUR FUCKIN FACE
Vwj
NewbieX
Prosecution knew the identity of the man since June, when he approached the prosecution to testify in exchange for immunity for other charges, including a DUI, but they rejected the offer,
Kyle was up on a charge of shooting at him (known in the case as “unknown man” strangely enough) so it would be fare to say that the prosecution didn’t tell anyone his identity because they didn’t want him to testify because he kicked Kyle in the face before any shots were fired at that point, and that would indeed be self defence because Kyle had nowhere to evade to,
Prosecution should be on trial for this and a few other things
