Yolo8515
Rookie
'Flooded with NATO weapons for 8 years' if they've been flooded with weapons why do they need the juicy ones now to fend off Russian aggression (Russia did invade a weaker country) Russia cries about fighting NATO & how they have to use nukes to defend themselves when NO NATO troops are fighting Russian troops, NO NATO troops are on Russian soil & only NATO advisers, not fighting troops are in Ukraine, so why are they crying & threatening using nukes when the troops they are fighting are Ukrainian? The end result will be as you say unless NATO steps in, Russia has other countries fighting troops with it on Ukrainian soil, so an even playing field would be to have a NATO country put boots on the ground, wouldn't it?
Ahhhh, mobilization videos, Ukrainian troops hauling men off the street to go to war, the joke is that there are fighting-age males walking past these arrests & not being grabbed themselves, why's that? More misrepresentative information, looks more like Military Police nabbing deserters & draft dodgers instead of mass mobilizations, wouldn't they be grabbing the other males walking past? Check it out again.
You still haven't answered my original question yet.
I'll comment on what I like(where I live you're allowed to express your views without disappearing), especially if it contains more of that misrepresentative information that's put out.
This right here folks; these are the kinds of stupid mf'ers that we have to deal with when we post things on this website. This dumb monkey asked for proof of mobilization in Ukraine, I provided said proof; and now said stupid mf'er doesn't agree with the videos before his eyes.
This is why I ignore stupid mf'ers on here, broke the cardinal sin by replying to this dummy.
You'll be getting no more replies from me fool