This is how the United States will become Latin America (1 Viewer)

[mrln]

There is rocks inside the pyramid that are huge and at a height that conventional cranes would struggle with...There has been theory after theory....But they haven't been able to work it out...There are heiroglyphics in the valley of the king's that are way underground...but there is no soot on the walls...Electric lights used?
View attachment 516908

 

[wiggins]

Is this a manifesto? 😆

no, shes a woman...

 

[Venture _Capitalist]

wtf is this? the worlds largest run-on sentence?

 

[loop0987]

No if you not if you don't care what happens to your country, especially if I can see the swastika on your profile
What nazi are you?
You don’t even have to go to school to study to be a criminal or a drug smuggler in the future
You can just start learning Spanish slowly and buy Jennifer Lopez DVD albums because Jenny from the block coming for you and terrrorize you

I got a fantastic video from a brave US cop VS crazy mexican with a knife
Be preparad
View attachment 513170

Good video. I don’t understand people like the assailant. Why did he come charging at the officer with a knife. There is only one way that ends. I feel bad for kids. They have a horrible father for him to put them through that.

 

[Der Wolf]

Good video. I don’t understand people like the assailant. Why did he come charging at the officer with a knife. There is only one way that ends. I feel bad for kids. They have a horrible father for him to put them through that.

They probably want to be suicidal or mentally ill, on drugs or drunk
In the US the cops shoot immediately if they see a knife
Everyone knows this, though there are those who attack the police officers

 

[diagnosticguy]

bitch americans invaded mexico and stole our land.....From 1846 to 1848, U.S. and Mexican troops fought against one another in the Mexican-American War. Ultimately, it was a battle for land where Mexico was fighting to keep what they thought was their property and the U.S. desired to retain the disputed land of Texas and obtain more of Mexico's northern lands.....im glad we are getting our land back...FUCK B&W'S

you need to stop getting history lessons from your crack dealer

 

[Graziani]

Are you american?brainfart is crazy aussie

 

[Graziani]

the Jewish people live closed in their community in a lot of countries and they don't piss anyone off.

 

[Graziani]

They probably want to be suicidal or mentally ill, on drugs or drunk
In the US the cops shoot immediately if they see a knife
Everyone knows this, though there are those who attack the police officers

Suicidal. It's a good option in USA by using Police guns. You just hold a knife and win a bullet

 

[Der Wolf]

the Jewish people live closed in their community in a lot of countries and they don't piss anyone off.

Then I don’t think Paris Hilton, the Rotschild family, George Soros, Steven Spielberg, Daniel Radcliffe, Steven Seagal, Drew Barrymore, AdrienBrody,Goldie Hawn, Rachel Weisz can be considered Jewish terrorists either?

Jews are one of the greatest terrorists in the world, as Hitler said 100 years ago

"The peoples' dispute and the hatred among one another, it is cultivated by very interested parties. It is a small rootless international clique that heats the peoples against each other and does not want them to come to rest."

and it is no accident that Jews have been restricted throughout Europe for 500 years

Jews have always been cohesive on a global scale, helped each other with a lot of money, and have always insidiously sought world power.
And in this plan, the idiot capitalist Americans found an excellent partner

 

[Backburner]

@Brainfart

Found this in an old quote from 1850 on how there was an advanced civilization in America. It was well over 1800 years old as well.

The special construction of these tumuli and the numerous instruments and utensils they contain are occupying the attention of many eminent American antiquaries. It is impossible to doubt the great age of these monuments. Squier is perfectly right in finding a proof of this in the mere fact that the skeletons discovered in the tumuli fall to pieces when brought into the slightest contact with the air, although the conditions for their preservation are excellent, so far as the quality of the soil is concerned. On the other hand, the bodies which lay buried under the cromlechs of Brittany, and which are at least 1 800 years old, are perfectly firm. Hence we may easily imagine that there is no relation between these ancient inhabitants of the land and the tribes of the present day — the Lenni-Lenapes and others. I must not end this note without praising the industry and resource shown by American scholars in the study of the antiquities of their continent. Finding their labours greatly hindered by the extreme brittleness of the skulls they had exhumed, they discovered, after many abortive attempts, a way of pouring a preparation of bitumen into the bodies, which solidifies at once and keeps the bones from crumbling. This delicate process, which requires infinite care and quickness, seems, as a rule, to be entirely successful.

This is one of the mentioned leading anthropologists, Squier -> E. G. Squier - Wikipedia

 

[NPLNBNPRT]

bitch americans invaded mexico and stole our land.....From 1846 to 1848, U.S. and Mexican troops fought against one another in the Mexican-American War. Ultimately, it was a battle for land where Mexico was fighting to keep what they thought was their property and the U.S. desired to retain the disputed land of Texas and obtain more of Mexico's northern lands.....im glad we are getting our land back...FUCK B&W'S

Who made it mexicos land? Nothing did. They lost, too bad for them.

And wey are taking it back, along with your women and money, bitch. 🖕🏿

 

[Ravishing Rick Rude]

who reads this?

I started reading this on May 23rd , I just finished now!!

 

[Interregnum]

I started reading this on May 23rd , I just finished now!!

im still reading btw

 

[Brainfart]

@Brainfart

Found this in an old quote from 1850 on how there was an advanced civilization in America. It was well over 1800 years old as well.

This is one of the mentioned leading anthropologists, Squier -> E. G. Squier - Wikipedia

Can you give me another link possibly with more info on the location and details about the artifacts?
I love this stuff...

 

[skink the bounty hunter]

View attachment 513104
Opening image: proportions of the Spanish-speaking population in the US, according to 2010 data (Wikimedia)

Helen Andrews is an American writer, journalist, and editor-in-chief of The American Conservative. From 2012 to 2017, he was a researcher at the Center for Independent Studies in Sydney, having previously edited the Washington Examiner. He is the author of Boomers: The Men and Women Who Promised Freedom and Delivered Disaster, published in January this year. *** In June 2020, a Democratic Political Action Committee called Priorities USA began campaigning among Spaniards with a video that “our families did not come to America to replace one caudillo (the common name for Latin American dictators - ed.)”. Writes Helen Andrews in her essay The American Conservative. He recalls that the cut below the text showed Donald Trump and Jair Bolsonaro, and the Democrats immediately offered a solution: "We don't need a caudillo, but a caballero (gentleman - ed.) Like Joe Biden." At about the same time, Donald Trump recorded his campaign song for Spaniards: “La buena vida! The economy! Hazlo por tu familia! Yo voy a votar por Donald Trump! ” ("The good life! The economy! Do it for your family! I'm going to vote for Donald Trump!") The short bastard announced. According to Andrews Trump also had success with it: he also won Florida and Texas, he won in the border counties inhabited by Hispanics with the greatest advantage, and received an even higher proportion of Latino votes in 2020 than in 2016, even though he already surpassed Mitt Romney’s 2012 result. “The Spanish-speakers who voted for Hillary Clinton pulled the trigger on it,” Andrews said. The author puts it this way, the Republican Party has traditionally developed two ways of thinking about Hispanics: there are amnesty parties like the Bush family who say “softening the party’s immigration policy is the only way to avoid political insignificance”; and there are fatalist pessimists who say that “if America’s demographics ever begin to resemble California, the national party will inevitably follow the California Republican Party into irrelevance”. According to him With his success among Latinos, Trump refuted both concepts. “It’s not a question of whether a Conservative party can win among Spaniards. The question is what the Spaniards will do with conservatism if they become integral parts of their coalition. Immigrants exert a gravitational effect proportional to their numbers, bringing the policies of their host country closer to the policies of the places they have left. By 2050, the United States will be made up of a third of Hispanics. Now is the time to ask what it will mean for our policy to become more Latin American, ”Andrews argues. According to the author, it is not socializing or dictating to say that Trump’s style resembled Hugo Chávez in many ways: Twitter resembled Chávez from 1999 to 2012 on the Venezuelan public television show, Aló, President. “None of them could expect a flattering news service from the journalism department, so they were forced to build direct channels of communication to the audience. They both agreed on a similar personality that is cheeky, spontaneous, peculiar, and surprisingly funny, ”Andrews says. Remaining with Venezuela, the author mentions that the South American oil power was the best-running country in Latin America in the 1980s, everyone waited for it to move into the first world - and then, after Chávez’s death, “sank back into the usual cycle of coups and civil wars. ”. According to him the chronic instability of Latin American countries is due to the lack of the middle class, since in none of the Latin American countries does the middle class make up the majority of the population, ‘what is middle class does not exactly fit the Anglo-Saxon definition’ because, thanks to the informal economy, many middle-income people work in black, so Andrews sees the characteristics that make the middle class so desirable in terms of political institution-building do not necessarily stop them - such as predictability, respect for the law, intolerance of corruption ”. Another crab in Latin America, Andrews says, is a lack of social trust. “Neither the laws nor their enforcers are considered impartial. Family dynasties are common in the Third World precisely because, where the general level of trust is low, people have more trust in family relationships where trust can at least be assumed, ”the author writes, citing the Brazilian and Bolivian presidential elections as an example of bias. up: Former Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva was jailed for corruption in 2018, and one of the strongest supporters of his conviction is a neoliberal Bolivian lawyer,It was Jeanine Añez, who later became President of Bolivia. Three years later, however, Lula was released because the Supreme Court abruptly overturned her verdict and Añez was shut down by her successor on an unfounded charge of incitement. “This imprisonment carousel always raises the stakes for power transfers,” Andrews believes. The author warns that since 2015, the middle class has not made up the majority in the United States, and there are areas on the west coast where inequality is on a Latin American scale, and public order is comparable to that of the Third World. “California’s elite will find the same solution that the Latin American elite has long devised for themselves: isolating itself from the illegitimate elements by building - or emigrating, its own security infrastructure,” Andrews analyzes. Although Andrews said Trump also had Latin American pulls during his presidency (e.g., he organized a white house interior from family members and used macho, insulting language instead of neutral bureaucratic language), in reality “it wasn’t the orange caudillo but his opponents who did more to get started. through Latin American instability, ”as Democrats“ exposed Trump to two unfounded impeachments, one of which happened days before he left office, so the whole process became clearly symbolic and lost the residual weight of impeachment as well ”. However, the author is fortunate that the majority of migrants arriving in the United States come from Mexico, which is the least unstable country in Latin America. He recalls that in Mexico, the party state operated by the PRI (Partido Revolucionario Institucional, Institutional Revolutionary Party) lasted for almost 80 years and survived the Soviet Union for a long time. Andrews said the PRI system was the perfect dictatorship, which realized that its critics were worth paying off rather than ransacking; where there were extensive networks of corruption but no labor camps; and press censorship was informal because while anyone could criticize anything, the state oversaw the paper industry and gave the paper to whom it wanted. The main flaw in the system was electoral fraud, with the party’s “alchemists” bringing the right result to every election through vote-buying, chain voting and other methods - greatly contributing to what Andrews cites as the third major problem in Latin American systems: conspiracy theories . “Many Mexicans today believe in extensive conspiracy theories that include drug cartels, corrupt politicians, and police, many of which are entirely conceivable,” the author writes. Vicente Fox’s victory in the 2000 presidential election eventually ended Mexico’s one-party system, but that didn’t solve Mexico’s problems. “Competitive elections require more money than non-competitive ones, and the fact that they need campaign dollars has made politicians, especially through cartels, more affordable,” analyzes Andrews, who warns that the United States will pay attention to this. “In the United States, our notions of political tyranny have been shaped too much by the Cold War. We believe that an American dictatorship will take the form of stifling Slavic totalitarianism. In reality, however, we are much more likely to sink into a Latin American dysfunction that is more chaotic than claustrophobic, ”the author believes. Andrews notes that the U.S. has spent millions of dollars every year for decades to develop Latin America’s political culture. "But what if we've paid them in vain so far to be like us, while we've become more like them?" He asks the question. As he recently moved back from Australia, he also sees signs of this - he was surprised, for example, that the institution of public toilets in the United States had virtually ceased to exist and that the toilets in cafes had become code-locked; in addition, parts of California already look like favelas, and Chicago car hackers are rivaling the bogots, so there will soon be South American-style security guards and security guards in front of malls. Andrews stresses that while many fear that in 15-20 years an American right-wing tyrant will come to power will end American democracy, it is actually “already seeing the rise of conspiratorial thinking” and either those who believe Trump’s conspiracy to erupt are right, or no, in his view, “the result is the same: cynicism and declining demands on norms of political behavior”. In conclusion, he warns that there has been as much impeachment in the country in the last two years as in the first two centuries of US existence, and Trump may be the first president to be convicted after leaving office - so “if Latin American politics is our future, we are on the right track ”.

I hate to break it to you but that was going to happen regardless of who is in office. It's a numbers game and Mexicans know this. Don't think that Mexicans don't notice those little passing jokes that we feel are harmless they know that they are indigenous and they feel they are entitled to America just as much if not more than we are. You ever noticed how many kids they have. It's intentional Mexican families do have these conversations.

 

[Backburner]

Can you give me another link possibly with more info on the location and details about the artifacts?
I love this stuff...

Unfortunately cannot help much, all I found was that he wrote these two books, Aboriginal Monuments of the State of New York

Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley

 

[Jefecito]

View attachment 513104
Opening image: proportions of the Spanish-speaking population in the US, according to 2010 data (Wikimedia)

Helen Andrews is an American writer, journalist, and editor-in-chief of The American Conservative. From 2012 to 2017, he was a researcher at the Center for Independent Studies in Sydney, having previously edited the Washington Examiner. He is the author of Boomers: The Men and Women Who Promised Freedom and Delivered Disaster, published in January this year. *** In June 2020, a Democratic Political Action Committee called Priorities USA began campaigning among Spaniards with a video that “our families did not come to America to replace one caudillo (the common name for Latin American dictators - ed.)”. Writes Helen Andrews in her essay The American Conservative. He recalls that the cut below the text showed Donald Trump and Jair Bolsonaro, and the Democrats immediately offered a solution: "We don't need a caudillo, but a caballero (gentleman - ed.) Like Joe Biden." At about the same time, Donald Trump recorded his campaign song for Spaniards: “La buena vida! The economy! Hazlo por tu familia! Yo voy a votar por Donald Trump! ” ("The good life! The economy! Do it for your family! I'm going to vote for Donald Trump!") The short bastard announced. According to Andrews Trump also had success with it: he also won Florida and Texas, he won in the border counties inhabited by Hispanics with the greatest advantage, and received an even higher proportion of Latino votes in 2020 than in 2016, even though he already surpassed Mitt Romney’s 2012 result. “The Spanish-speakers who voted for Hillary Clinton pulled the trigger on it,” Andrews said. The author puts it this way, the Republican Party has traditionally developed two ways of thinking about Hispanics: there are amnesty parties like the Bush family who say “softening the party’s immigration policy is the only way to avoid political insignificance”; and there are fatalist pessimists who say that “if America’s demographics ever begin to resemble California, the national party will inevitably follow the California Republican Party into irrelevance”. According to him With his success among Latinos, Trump refuted both concepts. “It’s not a question of whether a Conservative party can win among Spaniards. The question is what the Spaniards will do with conservatism if they become integral parts of their coalition. Immigrants exert a gravitational effect proportional to their numbers, bringing the policies of their host country closer to the policies of the places they have left. By 2050, the United States will be made up of a third of Hispanics. Now is the time to ask what it will mean for our policy to become more Latin American, ”Andrews argues. According to the author, it is not socializing or dictating to say that Trump’s style resembled Hugo Chávez in many ways: Twitter resembled Chávez from 1999 to 2012 on the Venezuelan public television show, Aló, President. “None of them could expect a flattering news service from the journalism department, so they were forced to build direct channels of communication to the audience. They both agreed on a similar personality that is cheeky, spontaneous, peculiar, and surprisingly funny, ”Andrews says. Remaining with Venezuela, the author mentions that the South American oil power was the best-running country in Latin America in the 1980s, everyone waited for it to move into the first world - and then, after Chávez’s death, “sank back into the usual cycle of coups and civil wars. ”. According to him the chronic instability of Latin American countries is due to the lack of the middle class, since in none of the Latin American countries does the middle class make up the majority of the population, ‘what is middle class does not exactly fit the Anglo-Saxon definition’ because, thanks to the informal economy, many middle-income people work in black, so Andrews sees the characteristics that make the middle class so desirable in terms of political institution-building do not necessarily stop them - such as predictability, respect for the law, intolerance of corruption ”. Another crab in Latin America, Andrews says, is a lack of social trust. “Neither the laws nor their enforcers are considered impartial. Family dynasties are common in the Third World precisely because, where the general level of trust is low, people have more trust in family relationships where trust can at least be assumed, ”the author writes, citing the Brazilian and Bolivian presidential elections as an example of bias. up: Former Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva was jailed for corruption in 2018, and one of the strongest supporters of his conviction is a neoliberal Bolivian lawyer,It was Jeanine Añez, who later became President of Bolivia. Three years later, however, Lula was released because the Supreme Court abruptly overturned her verdict and Añez was shut down by her successor on an unfounded charge of incitement. “This imprisonment carousel always raises the stakes for power transfers,” Andrews believes. The author warns that since 2015, the middle class has not made up the majority in the United States, and there are areas on the west coast where inequality is on a Latin American scale, and public order is comparable to that of the Third World. “California’s elite will find the same solution that the Latin American elite has long devised for themselves: isolating itself from the illegitimate elements by building - or emigrating, its own security infrastructure,” Andrews analyzes. Although Andrews said Trump also had Latin American pulls during his presidency (e.g., he organized a white house interior from family members and used macho, insulting language instead of neutral bureaucratic language), in reality “it wasn’t the orange caudillo but his opponents who did more to get started. through Latin American instability, ”as Democrats“ exposed Trump to two unfounded impeachments, one of which happened days before he left office, so the whole process became clearly symbolic and lost the residual weight of impeachment as well ”. However, the author is fortunate that the majority of migrants arriving in the United States come from Mexico, which is the least unstable country in Latin America. He recalls that in Mexico, the party state operated by the PRI (Partido Revolucionario Institucional, Institutional Revolutionary Party) lasted for almost 80 years and survived the Soviet Union for a long time. Andrews said the PRI system was the perfect dictatorship, which realized that its critics were worth paying off rather than ransacking; where there were extensive networks of corruption but no labor camps; and press censorship was informal because while anyone could criticize anything, the state oversaw the paper industry and gave the paper to whom it wanted. The main flaw in the system was electoral fraud, with the party’s “alchemists” bringing the right result to every election through vote-buying, chain voting and other methods - greatly contributing to what Andrews cites as the third major problem in Latin American systems: conspiracy theories . “Many Mexicans today believe in extensive conspiracy theories that include drug cartels, corrupt politicians, and police, many of which are entirely conceivable,” the author writes. Vicente Fox’s victory in the 2000 presidential election eventually ended Mexico’s one-party system, but that didn’t solve Mexico’s problems. “Competitive elections require more money than non-competitive ones, and the fact that they need campaign dollars has made politicians, especially through cartels, more affordable,” analyzes Andrews, who warns that the United States will pay attention to this. “In the United States, our notions of political tyranny have been shaped too much by the Cold War. We believe that an American dictatorship will take the form of stifling Slavic totalitarianism. In reality, however, we are much more likely to sink into a Latin American dysfunction that is more chaotic than claustrophobic, ”the author believes. Andrews notes that the U.S. has spent millions of dollars every year for decades to develop Latin America’s political culture. "But what if we've paid them in vain so far to be like us, while we've become more like them?" He asks the question. As he recently moved back from Australia, he also sees signs of this - he was surprised, for example, that the institution of public toilets in the United States had virtually ceased to exist and that the toilets in cafes had become code-locked; in addition, parts of California already look like favelas, and Chicago car hackers are rivaling the bogots, so there will soon be South American-style security guards and security guards in front of malls. Andrews stresses that while many fear that in 15-20 years an American right-wing tyrant will come to power will end American democracy, it is actually “already seeing the rise of conspiratorial thinking” and either those who believe Trump’s conspiracy to erupt are right, or no, in his view, “the result is the same: cynicism and declining demands on norms of political behavior”. In conclusion, he warns that there has been as much impeachment in the country in the last two years as in the first two centuries of US existence, and Trump may be the first president to be convicted after leaving office - so “if Latin American politics is our future, we are on the right track ”.

Oyeah go back to europe white trash piece of shit. Thats brown land. Viva la raza

 

[Weak white faggots]

View attachment 513104
Opening image: proportions of the Spanish-speaking population in the US, according to 2010 data (Wikimedia)

Helen Andrews is an American writer, journalist, and editor-in-chief of The American Conservative. From 2012 to 2017, he was a researcher at the Center for Independent Studies in Sydney, having previously edited the Washington Examiner. He is the author of Boomers: The Men and Women Who Promised Freedom and Delivered Disaster, published in January this year. *** In June 2020, a Democratic Political Action Committee called Priorities USA began campaigning among Spaniards with a video that “our families did not come to America to replace one caudillo (the common name for Latin American dictators - ed.)”. Writes Helen Andrews in her essay The American Conservative. He recalls that the cut below the text showed Donald Trump and Jair Bolsonaro, and the Democrats immediately offered a solution: "We don't need a caudillo, but a caballero (gentleman - ed.) Like Joe Biden." At about the same time, Donald Trump recorded his campaign song for Spaniards: “La buena vida! The economy! Hazlo por tu familia! Yo voy a votar por Donald Trump! ” ("The good life! The economy! Do it for your family! I'm going to vote for Donald Trump!") The short bastard announced. According to Andrews Trump also had success with it: he also won Florida and Texas, he won in the border counties inhabited by Hispanics with the greatest advantage, and received an even higher proportion of Latino votes in 2020 than in 2016, even though he already surpassed Mitt Romney’s 2012 result. “The Spanish-speakers who voted for Hillary Clinton pulled the trigger on it,” Andrews said. The author puts it this way, the Republican Party has traditionally developed two ways of thinking about Hispanics: there are amnesty parties like the Bush family who say “softening the party’s immigration policy is the only way to avoid political insignificance”; and there are fatalist pessimists who say that “if America’s demographics ever begin to resemble California, the national party will inevitably follow the California Republican Party into irrelevance”. According to him With his success among Latinos, Trump refuted both concepts. “It’s not a question of whether a Conservative party can win among Spaniards. The question is what the Spaniards will do with conservatism if they become integral parts of their coalition. Immigrants exert a gravitational effect proportional to their numbers, bringing the policies of their host country closer to the policies of the places they have left. By 2050, the United States will be made up of a third of Hispanics. Now is the time to ask what it will mean for our policy to become more Latin American, ”Andrews argues. According to the author, it is not socializing or dictating to say that Trump’s style resembled Hugo Chávez in many ways: Twitter resembled Chávez from 1999 to 2012 on the Venezuelan public television show, Aló, President. “None of them could expect a flattering news service from the journalism department, so they were forced to build direct channels of communication to the audience. They both agreed on a similar personality that is cheeky, spontaneous, peculiar, and surprisingly funny, ”Andrews says. Remaining with Venezuela, the author mentions that the South American oil power was the best-running country in Latin America in the 1980s, everyone waited for it to move into the first world - and then, after Chávez’s death, “sank back into the usual cycle of coups and civil wars. ”. According to him the chronic instability of Latin American countries is due to the lack of the middle class, since in none of the Latin American countries does the middle class make up the majority of the population, ‘what is middle class does not exactly fit the Anglo-Saxon definition’ because, thanks to the informal economy, many middle-income people work in black, so Andrews sees the characteristics that make the middle class so desirable in terms of political institution-building do not necessarily stop them - such as predictability, respect for the law, intolerance of corruption ”. Another crab in Latin America, Andrews says, is a lack of social trust. “Neither the laws nor their enforcers are considered impartial. Family dynasties are common in the Third World precisely because, where the general level of trust is low, people have more trust in family relationships where trust can at least be assumed, ”the author writes, citing the Brazilian and Bolivian presidential elections as an example of bias. up: Former Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva was jailed for corruption in 2018, and one of the strongest supporters of his conviction is a neoliberal Bolivian lawyer,It was Jeanine Añez, who later became President of Bolivia. Three years later, however, Lula was released because the Supreme Court abruptly overturned her verdict and Añez was shut down by her successor on an unfounded charge of incitement. “This imprisonment carousel always raises the stakes for power transfers,” Andrews believes. The author warns that since 2015, the middle class has not made up the majority in the United States, and there are areas on the west coast where inequality is on a Latin American scale, and public order is comparable to that of the Third World. “California’s elite will find the same solution that the Latin American elite has long devised for themselves: isolating itself from the illegitimate elements by building - or emigrating, its own security infrastructure,” Andrews analyzes. Although Andrews said Trump also had Latin American pulls during his presidency (e.g., he organized a white house interior from family members and used macho, insulting language instead of neutral bureaucratic language), in reality “it wasn’t the orange caudillo but his opponents who did more to get started. through Latin American instability, ”as Democrats“ exposed Trump to two unfounded impeachments, one of which happened days before he left office, so the whole process became clearly symbolic and lost the residual weight of impeachment as well ”. However, the author is fortunate that the majority of migrants arriving in the United States come from Mexico, which is the least unstable country in Latin America. He recalls that in Mexico, the party state operated by the PRI (Partido Revolucionario Institucional, Institutional Revolutionary Party) lasted for almost 80 years and survived the Soviet Union for a long time. Andrews said the PRI system was the perfect dictatorship, which realized that its critics were worth paying off rather than ransacking; where there were extensive networks of corruption but no labor camps; and press censorship was informal because while anyone could criticize anything, the state oversaw the paper industry and gave the paper to whom it wanted. The main flaw in the system was electoral fraud, with the party’s “alchemists” bringing the right result to every election through vote-buying, chain voting and other methods - greatly contributing to what Andrews cites as the third major problem in Latin American systems: conspiracy theories . “Many Mexicans today believe in extensive conspiracy theories that include drug cartels, corrupt politicians, and police, many of which are entirely conceivable,” the author writes. Vicente Fox’s victory in the 2000 presidential election eventually ended Mexico’s one-party system, but that didn’t solve Mexico’s problems. “Competitive elections require more money than non-competitive ones, and the fact that they need campaign dollars has made politicians, especially through cartels, more affordable,” analyzes Andrews, who warns that the United States will pay attention to this. “In the United States, our notions of political tyranny have been shaped too much by the Cold War. We believe that an American dictatorship will take the form of stifling Slavic totalitarianism. In reality, however, we are much more likely to sink into a Latin American dysfunction that is more chaotic than claustrophobic, ”the author believes. Andrews notes that the U.S. has spent millions of dollars every year for decades to develop Latin America’s political culture. "But what if we've paid them in vain so far to be like us, while we've become more like them?" He asks the question. As he recently moved back from Australia, he also sees signs of this - he was surprised, for example, that the institution of public toilets in the United States had virtually ceased to exist and that the toilets in cafes had become code-locked; in addition, parts of California already look like favelas, and Chicago car hackers are rivaling the bogots, so there will soon be South American-style security guards and security guards in front of malls. Andrews stresses that while many fear that in 15-20 years an American right-wing tyrant will come to power will end American democracy, it is actually “already seeing the rise of conspiratorial thinking” and either those who believe Trump’s conspiracy to erupt are right, or no, in his view, “the result is the same: cynicism and declining demands on norms of political behavior”. In conclusion, he warns that there has been as much impeachment in the country in the last two years as in the first two centuries of US existence, and Trump may be the first president to be convicted after leaving office - so “if Latin American politics is our future, we are on the right track ”.

Posted by another uneducated dumb ignorant cracker that don't know who his criminal degenerate forefathers stole this land from

Maine is looking better and better!

Maine belongs to indigenous people just as well. Take your thieving asses back to Europe

Maine is looking better and better!

Maine belongs to indigenous people just as well. Take your thieving asses back to Europe

 

[Götterdämmerung]

You little imperialist and capitalist yankee cocksucker:
- The United States the number one supporter of all Jews in the world, thereby supporting global Jewish terror
Everything that Jews do dirty here in Europe or anywhere in the world is equally the responsibility of America because they support the world's Jews with an infinite amount of dollars.

I know the member isn't here to defend his views, but I have to ask...how does what Jews do dirty differ from what anyone else does dirty? Is there some ethical line that non-Jews wont cross? I think once enough money and power is involved the rights violated and liberties quashed are the same no matter who is doing it.